Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 22;13(14):4265. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144265

Table 3.

Logistic regression analysis with different variables taken into consideration.

Variable Coefficient Standard Error p-Value Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Interval
IDO presence in IF 1.7464 0.4780 0.0003 5.7341 (2.2470, 14.6324)
Recipient’s sex 1 0.6064 0.4825 0.2088 1.8338 (0.7123, 4.7212)
HLA MM >3 2 −0.7089 0.4334 0.1019 0.4922 (0.2105, 1.1509)
PRA >50% 3 0.0608 0.9684 0.9499 1.0627 (0.1593, 7.0909)
CIT >20 h 4 0.8753 0.4406 0.0469 2.3997 (1.0119, 5.6906)
Living donor 0.4948 1.0903 0.6499 1.6402 (0.1936, 13.8971)
Proteinuria > 0.5 g 5 −0.2138 0.4135 0.6050 0.8075 (0.3591, 1.8159)
DGF 6 0.4000 1.2219 0.6050 1.4918 (0.1360, 16.3618)
Glomerulonephritis −0.3415 0.4410 0.4387 0.7107 (0.2994, 1.6869)
Tacrolimus −1.3162 0.7772 0.0904 0.2682 (0.0585, 1.2302)
Cyclosporin −0.8994 0.7818 0.2500 0.4068 (0.0879, 1.8830)
Constant −0.5004 0.9398 0.5944

1 For purposes of the analysis: 1 = male, 0 = female; 2 Human leukocyte antigen mismatches, more than 3; 3 Panel-reactive antibodies, more than 50%; 4 Cold ischemia time, more than 20 h; 5 Proteinuria larger than 0.5 g; 6 Delayed graft function.