Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 30;26(4):382–388. doi: 10.4103/aja202378

Supplementary Table 2.

Association of dietary niacin intake and erectile dysfunction risk after propensity score matching

Variable Model 1 Model 2 Model 3 Model 4




OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
Dietary niacin 0.98 (0.97–0.99) 0.003 0.98 (0.97–1.00) 0.01 0.98 (0.97–1.00) 0.01 0.98 (0.97–1.00) 0.02
Stratified by dietary niacin quartiles
 Tertile 1 1 1 1 1
 Tertile 2 0.85 (0.58–1.24) 0.38 0.81 (0.56–1.20) 0.28 0.82 (0.55–1.23) 0.31 0.82 (0.53–1.27) 0.31
 Tertile 3 0.59 (0.44–0.81) 0.002 0.61 (0.44–0.83) 0.003 0.59 (0.41–0.84) 0.01 0.58 (0.39–0.86) 0.01
P for trend 0.002 0.004 0.02 0.012

Model 1: unadjusted; Model 2: adjusted for age and race, marital status, education level, PIR, and BMI categories; Model 3: adjusted for age, race, marital status, education level, PIR, BMI categories, recreational activity, smoking, drinking status, and total daily energy intake; Model 4: additionally adjusted for CVD, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, diabetes, as well as testosterone levels. OR: odd ratio; CI: confidence interval; BMI: body mass index; PIR: poverty income ratio; CVD: cardiovascular disease