| Device Name | Device Function | Device Type | Construct |
| HR Monitor #12 | Cardiac | ECG (chest) | Fatigue |
| Parameter | Assessment method | Score | |
| Measurement Principles | |||
| Sensitivity | Sensitive to three levels of fatigue | 0 1 2 3 4 ⑤ | |
| Specificity | False alarm rate < 5% | 0 1 2 ③ 4 5 | |
| Validity | Cross Correlation > 0.8 | 0 1 2 3 4 ⑤ | |
| Reliability | Show test retest reliability | 0 1 2 3 4 ⑤ | |
| Diagnosticity | Identifies source of fatigue | 0 1 ② 3 4 5 | |
| Generalizability | ECG not affected by skin quality | 0 1 2 3 ④ 5 | |
| Usability Principles | |||
| Intrusiveness | No distractions from device? | 0 1 2 3 4 ⑤ | |
| Weight/Size | Device is a good weight/size | 0 1 2 3 ④ 5 | |
| Ease of use | No issues taking device on/off | 0 1 2 3 4 ⑤ | |
| Acceptance | Operators feel the device is fair and transparent? | 0 1 2 3 4 ⑤ | |
| Wireless communication/connectivity | Device didn’t disconnect more than 1 time? | 0 1 2 3 4 ⑤ | |
| Individual Differences | N/A | 0 | |
| Wearability | Device didn’t cause discomfort? | 0 1 2 3 ④ 5 | |
| Power Consumption | Battery didn’t die on shift? | 0 1 2 3 4 ⑤ | |
| Design Parameters | |||
| Toughness | Device didn’t break? | 0 1 2 3 4 ⑤ | |
| Water Tolerance | N/A | 0 | |
| Interaction Method | Touch screen worked well? | 0 1 2 3 ④ 5 | |
| Onboard vs. secondary device processing | N/A | 0 | |
| Modularity | N/A | 0 | |
| Type of electrode | Textile electrode | 0 1 2 3 4 ⑤ | |
| Cleaning and maintenance | Device machine washable? | 0 1 2 3 ④ 5 | |
| Sampling rate | Above 64 hz? | 0 1 2 3 4 ⑤ | |
| Total Score | Parameter score = 88 | ||