Abstract
Autologous fat grating is a widely-accepted method to correct soft tissue deficiency. Although fat transplantation shows excellent biocompatibility and simple applicability, the relatively low retention rate caused by fat necrosis is still a challenge. The vasculature is integral after fat grafting, serving multiple crucial functions. Rapid and effective angiogenesis within grafts is essential for supplying oxygen necessary for adipocytes’ survival. It facilitates the influx of inflammatory cells to remove necrotic adipocytes and aids in the delivery of regenerative cells for adipose tissue regeneration in fat grafts. The vasculature also provides a niche for interaction between adipose progenitor cells and vascular progenitor cells, enhancing angiogenesis and adipogenesis in grafts. Various methods, such as enriching grafts with diverse pro-angiogenic cells or utilizing cell-free approaches, have been employed to enhance angiogenesis. Beige and dedifferentiated adipocytes in grafts could increase vessel density. This review aims to outline the function of vasculature in fat grafting and discuss different cell or cell-free approaches that can enhance angiogenesis following fat grafting.
Keywords: fat grafting, cell-enrichment therapy, angiogenesis, vasculature function
Graphical Abstract.
Introduction
Autologous fat grafting is a procedure performed by plastic surgeons with the primary goal of restoring soft tissue defects and correcting facial deficiency 1 . In recent years, it has become a prevalent surgical method in cosmetic surgery for facial rejuvenation2,3, gluteal augmentation 3 , and breast reconstructive surgery 4 . Compared with other biologically active gels such as hyaluronic acid, it shows better biocompatibility and is relatively economical for patients3,5.
Suction-harvested adipose tissue, while effective for extraction, faces a challenge due to its lack of a natural vascular network essential for oxygenation and nutrient distribution. This deficiency can lead to undesired volume reduction, fibrosis, and the development of oil cysts due to fat necrosis6–9. Therefore, timely vascularization reconstruction is a crucial prerequisite for achieving high survival rates after fat grafting 10 . Based on the different extent of ischemic, three distinct zones emerge after fat grafting: survival (periphery), regeneration (intermediate), and necrosis (central). Initially, the boundary between the necrotic and regenerating areas is not distinctly demarcated, and the regenerative potential of the regeneration area relies on the timely ingrowth of capillaries that provide oxygen11,12. Except for providing essential oxygen, reconstructed vasculature exerts multiple functions in the fat grafting model, such as providing circulating stem cells and inflammatory cells from circulation to remodel the grafts 13 and provide a niche for the adipogenesis of perivascular cells, such as adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs), preadipocytes and pericytes, and so on (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Vasculature function in fat grafting. Vasculature provides a timely and enough supply of oxygen and nutrients to reduce the apoptosis of adipocytes in the early hypoxia and ischemic environment and transport unessential triglycerides to the blood to avoid lipo-toxin-induced inflammation. Vasculature delivers early-stage inflammatory cells that could clear the damaged cells and extracellular matrix to give regenerative cells a better regenerative microenvironment. Vasculature provides a perivascular niche for the mesenchymal stem cells (especially ASCs) to proliferate and differentiate into regenerated adipocytes and promote neovasculogenesis through paracrine pro-angiogenic factors or transdifferentiate into ECs. ASCs, adipose-derived stem cells; ECs, endothelial cells.
This review focuses on the vascular function that contributes to the survival and remodeling of grafts, summarizes the cellular-derived angiogenic stimulation that benefits the neovascularization after fat grafting, and provides a future perspective for the following exploration.
Vasculature Function After Fat Grafting
Delivering Essential Oxygen Crucial and Nutrient-Waste Exchange for Adipocyte Survival
Following grafting, adipose tissue enters a state of severe ischemic and hypoxia, characterized by low oxygen levels 13 . Most adipocytes in the graft begin to die within 24 h ASCs remain viable for up to 72 h but still demonstrate limited resistance to hypoxia. Hence, the angiogenesis process within the first 72 h after grafting assumes paramount importance. This period is crucial for ensuring the timely delivery of oxygen and nutrients to rescue the transplanted cells, ultimately influencing their fate13,14.
Before angiogenesis occurs, grafted adipose tissue can only receive oxygen through plasmatic diffusion from surrounding vessels 12 . It takes 3–7 days for the peripheral vessels to ingrow into the outer layer of the grafts 15 . Moreover, newly formed blood vessels in grafts provide nutrients and exchange metabolic products after 2 days of implantation16,17. To guarantee sufficient blood and oxygen delivery to the graft, each fat graft droplet must interface with a capillary recipient site in a 1:1 ratio to establish a successful fat–recipient complex. Excessive fat droplets relative to capillary recipient sites can result in inadequate neovasculogenesis, potentially leading to fat resorption and necrosis 18 . Therefore, smaller grafts tend to exhibit better survival rates compared with larger grafts due to the higher surface-to-volume ratio, which allows for a larger area of the graft to be in contact with the vascular bed and facilitates more efficient vascularization16,19. Adequate oxygen supply is also essential for macrophages to effectively clear dead adipocytes and lipid droplets by maintaining proper fatty acid oxidation 20 . Moreover, timely vascularization provides a channel for transporting excess triglycerides into the bloodstream, thereby reducing lipotoxin-induced massive inflammation21–24.
Supplying Circulating Stem Cells and Inflammatory Cells From Circulation to Adipose Tissue Graft
After grafting, macrophages infiltrate into the grafts in the early stage to promote remodeling by clearing free fatty acids, phagocytosing dead cells, and digesting damaged extracellular matrix (ECM) components. These activities create space for regenerative cells such as ASCs, endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), and other stem cells, which can enhance angiogenesis and adipogenesis25–27. Traditional perspectives considered that macrophages infiltrated into the inflammatory site are mainly from circulation 28 . In recent investigations, it has been established that during the initial week post-surgery, the proportion of infiltrated macrophages derived from the fascia surpasses that of macrophages originating from circulation. Notably, experiments involving the removal of fascia from the back of recipient mice in the fat grafting model have revealed a subsequent reduction in the number of early-stage macrophage infiltrations 29 .
New vasculature also provides channels for the circulating stem cells, new vessels within the graft predominantly arise from recipient vessels growing into the graft, rather than from the reassembly of donor endothelial cells (ECs) or the reconnection of recipient and donor vessels 30 . In the nascent phase of angiogenesis within the grafts, conduits are established to facilitate the ingress of blood-derived hematopoietic cells and ASCs, thereby enabling their pivotal contribution to the initial stages of regeneration 31 . From a long-term perspective, most of the CD34+ cells are derived from the recipient during adipogenesis rather than in the initial grafts 30 . Besides, bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitors are also capable of migrating to the ischemic location, then differentiate into ECs and finally become capillaries in the superficial graft zones32,14.
Providing NICHE for Adipogenesis and Angiogenesis in Grafts
Mounting evidence indicates that ASCs along with other types of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are closely linked to vascular and perivascular niches in different tissues 33 . During human embryonic development, adipocytes first appear from emergent vascular networks 34 . Lineage-tracing studies have demonstrated that adipocyte progenitors reside within the walls of adult mouse adipose tissue capillaries35,36. Co-implantation of adipose tissue with ASCs differentiated toward an endothelial phenotype significantly enhances both the survival and angiogenesis of the transplanted adipose tissue 37 . Coculturing EPCs with ASCs enhances EPCs’ tube formation capacities and angiogenesis markers such as tie2 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A. ASCs’ combination enhances the function of EPCs in the fat transplant rather than directly differentiating into them 38 . ASCs, often found alongside microvessels, stabilize the perivascular niche by differentiating into pericytes and expressing key pericyte markers such as α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), neural/glial antigen 2 (NG2), or platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFRβ) 39 . Indeed, perivascular cells such as vascular smooth muscle cells and pericytes have been proven to give rise not only to white adipocytes but also to differentiate into beige adipocytes40,41, which are located around the vasculature, sharing the same location as pericytes 42 . Inducing more pericytes in transplanted adipose tissue could also enhance the adipocytes’ viability and increase the survival of adipocytes 43 , which could also shed light on the function of pericytes as the orchestrators of vasculature and adipogenesis 40 . Besides, the reciprocal interaction between preadipocytes and endothelial cells (ECs) was promoted by the infiltration of blood vessels 44 . Preadipocytes induce and guide EC migration through fibroblast growth factor (FGF)- and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-dependent pathways 45 . Conversely, the VEGF-triggered signaling pathway in ECs promotes preadipocyte differentiation via a paracrine mechanism 46 . Differentiation from preadipocytes to mature adipocytes is associated with increased production of angiogenic factors that induce robust angiogenic responses 47 .
Cell-Enrichment Therapy in Fat Grafting
Enhancing fat grafts with diverse cell types that demonstrate significant angiogenic activity is presently recognized as a highly effective approach for enhancing the neovasculogenesis of transplanted adipose tissue. To achieve this objective, macrophages, ASCs, and other cells from the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) have been proposed 10 .
Endothelial Progenitor Cell
EPCs obtained from humans can integrate into sites of active angiogenesis, thereby enhancing the growth of collateral vessels in ischemic tissues 32 . The sprouting of the peripheral vessels toward the graft typically spans a period of 3–7 days with the recruitment of EPCs15,48–50. Bone marrow-derived EPCs migrate to a target ischemic site, then differentiate into ECs, and finally become capillaries for the superficial graft zones32,14. However, the EPCs cannot migrate through the outer graft layers to access the ischemic center, meaning that the inner part depends on its progenitor cells to induce capillary formation51,52. Combining EPCs with fat grafts has been shown to enhance early-stage angiogenesis while minimizing the development of oil cysts and fibrosis. In their pursuit of EPCs with heightened regenerative potential, Asahara et al. utilized a serum-free medium comprising five different vasculogenic components (VEGF, stem cell factor, Flt-3 ligand, thrombopoietin and interleukin 6)—designed as a Quality and Quantity culture (QQ culture) for cell expansion and vasculogenic of EPCs 53 . Maxim et al. discovered that when transplanted with QQ cultured c-Kit+ Sca-1+ Lin− (KSL) EPCs, grafts get better angiogenesis and less fibrosis and inflammation levels 52 . Their further study proves that the QQ culture method also enhanced the vasculogenic potential of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNCs) by enriching them with EPCs and anti-inflammatory M2-monocyte/macrophages. Grafts enriched with MNC-QQ exhibit the highest vessel density and secrete increased levels of VEGF paracrine 51 .
Macrophage
In the normal response to injury of multiple tissue types, monocytes infiltrate the wound site and differentiate into macrophages that exhibit a highly pro-inflammatory phenotype, at later stages, the macrophage population undergoes a shift in phenotype to pro-regenerative status54,55 (Figure 2). The conventional classification of macrophage phenotype can be delineated into two primary types: the pro-inflammatory M1-polarized phenotype and the regenerative, pro-angiogenic M2-polarized phenotype 56 . Another article has challenged this viewpoint, both M1 and M2 macrophages can facilitate the vascular reconstruction and vascular remodeling process. Primary human M1 macrophages secrete high levels of VEGF and increase the expression of VEGFR2 on EC 57 . In the M2 macrophage subset, M2a macrophages secrete PDGF-BB, stabilizing pericytes and enhancing EC sprouting. Meanwhile, M2c macrophages release MMP9, contributing to basement membrane degradation and ECM remodeling. Besides, M2c-derived osteopontin promotes EC proliferation and migration 58 .
Figure 2.
Macrophage function in microenvironment after fat grafting. IL, interleukin; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide synthase; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; VEGFR2, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2; ECM, extracellular matrix; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-β; CCL, C-C motif chemokine ligand; CXCL, C-X-C motif chemokine; PPARγ, peroxisome proliferatoractivated receptor γ; PDGF-BB, platelet-derived growth factor subunit B.
Monocyte infiltration into the grafts shows the same pattern as the common injury. During the first week after surgery, grafts enter an “inflammatory phase,” M1 macrophages emerge within the first week to facilitate the clearance of necrotic tissue and release pro-inflammatory factors26,59,60. Then in the regeneration stage (weeks 2–4 and beyond), there is a gradual transition as M1 macrophages are gradually replaced by M2 macrophages, which shift toward regulating angiogenesis and suppressing inflammation59,61,62. M2 macrophages facilitate the sprouting of pre-existing blood vessels and their subsequent fusion to form new functional vasculature. This process is mediated by the direct localization of M2 macrophages at the fusion sites, where they engage with integrins on the EC surfaces, thereby promoting the connection of adjacent tip cells 63 . Moreover, as previously mentioned, osteopontin derived from M2 macrophages also contributes to promoting endothelial tip cell linkage by interacting with integrins on the surface of ECs 64 . Numerous factors in fat grafting contribute to the enhancement of M2 macrophage polarization (as depicted in the figure), indirectly fostering angiogenesis and shifting the pro-inflammatory microenvironment toward an anti-inflammatory state post-fat grafting65–67.
Manipulating macrophage infiltration by using liposome-clodronate/Macrophage-Colony Stimulating Factor (M-CSF) resulted in either incompetent or improved angiogenesis after grafting 68 . Early macrophage infiltration in grafts demonstrates a robust correlation with the onset of early neovasculogenesis. The early presence of macrophages plays a pivotal role in attracting more Sca-1+/CD45+ stem cells capable of generating ECs and neovessels possibly through the CXCL12/CXCR4 axis 68 , and CXCL12 are also capable of promoting EPCs mediated angiogenesis and reduce the fat apoptosis 69 . Chen et al. highlight the reciprocal mechanism that early angiogenesis is also essential for CXCL12-dependent ASC recruitment. Besides, inhibiting CXCL12 expression at the donor site in the autologous fat grafting model promotes increased ASC infiltration into the recipient site, thereby raising graft retention rates 31 .
Macrophage cell-enrichment therapy increases the vascularization of grafts. Both M0, M1, and M2a could enhance the revascularized ability in transplanted vascular grafts or glutaraldehyde-crosslinked scaffolds57,58. Mixing M2 macrophage with white adipose transplant also increases the angiogenesis after 3 months of grafting 70 . QQ-cultured PBMNCs including EPCs and M2 macrophage also increase the neovascularization in the grafts both in 1 week or 7 weeks after grafting. Moreover, QQ-cultured PBMNCs promote angiogenesis through upregulating the expression of VEGF-A in the graft and QQ-cultured MNCs are capable of becoming a part of the newly formed vessel 51 .
ASCs’ Function in Cell-Assisted Lipotransfer (CAL)
Advanced regenerative therapies focus on harnessing the potential of stem cells, for direct application to damaged sites, known as cell therapy, or for tissue engineering by utilizing suitable scaffolds as carriers for these cells which holds distinct advantages over differentiated cells 71 . Adipose tissue has been historically considered a passive energy storage. However, currently, it is well known that it is also a rich source of multipotent ASCs72,73. ASCs express the surface MSC markers CD73, CD90, CD105, and STRO-1 and display a broad range of regenerative properties including a high replication capacity and potential to differentiate into various cell lineages, as well as the ability to secrete numerous pro-angiogenic growth factors, which are essential for promoting the formation of vascular networks and supporting the vasculature hemostasis74,75.
Yoshimura’s group pioneered the utilization of exogenous ASCs in fat grafting and named this procedure “cell-assisted lipotransfer (CAL).” By elevating the local concentration of ASCs during the initial phase of grafting, CAL enhances angiogenesis and consequently improves graft retention rates 76 .
VEGF (also known as VEGF-A) 77 serves as an excellent target for enhancing the paracrine function of ASCs in promoting the formation and stabilization of vascular networks within grafts. VEGF induces proliferation, sprouting, migration, and tube formation of ECs and also keeps the ECs survive77–79 (Figure 3). Oxygen deprivation activates hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF1α) in macrophages and ASCs, leading to the expression of VEGF-A, which stimulates the specification of ECs into tip cells and stalk cells. These tip cells, characterized by their high motility, actively sense environmental guidance cues and guide the nascent sprouts by forming filopodia. Stalk cells provide structural support to the nascent capillary as part of the body of the nascent sprout. Mechanistically, VEGF binds to the VEGFR2 receptor expressed on tip cells, promoting their proliferation, migration, and adhesion. Concurrently, the phosphorylation of the VEGFR2 receptor activates the DLL4-NOTCH1 signaling pathway in adjacent ECs, which inhibits VEGFR2 expression in these neighboring cells. This inhibition promotes the stalk cell phenotype, which matures and stabilizes the nascent sprout by recruiting more pericytes and ECM 77 .
Figure 3.
The function of VEGF in the angiogenesis. Under hypoxia conditions, macrophages and ASCs-derived VEGF specify the expression of endothelial cells into tip cells and stalk cells. Tip cells function as a guider to build connections with the adjacent vessels and stalk cells function as a supporter to give structural support.
HIF1α-VEGF axis in ASCs mediates the angiogenesis in grafts. C-reactive protein (CRP) affected the proliferation and pro-angiogenic paracrine activity of ASCs through upregulating VEGF-A expression by activating HIF-1α 80 . Moreover, inhibiting the negative regulator of VEGF-A with a DII4-neutralizing antibody enhances the angiogenesis of grafts and exhibits synergistic effects when combined with concurrent ASC supplementation 81 .
Besides, the overexpression of miR-126 in ASCs results in increased expression of VEGF. Transplanting adipose tissue with exogenous ASCs that overexpress miR-126 enhances the angiogenic capacity of grafts. This effect is mediated through the Erk/Akt pathway rather than via only VEGF signaling 82 . Besides, transplanting white adipose tissue (WAT) with exogenous ASCs transduced with VEGF also increases the angiogenesis and capillary density in the grafts 75 .
The trans-differentiation of ASCs into ECs and pericytes represents another mechanism contributing to angiogenesis in grafts following CAL. EC-derived basic FGF (bFGF) triggers endothelial differentiation in ASCs by inhibiting miR-145 through the PI3K/AKT/FOXO1 signaling pathway. This inhibition relieves suppression of the angiogenic transcription factor ETS1, thereby promoting the differentiation of ASCs into ECs 83 . Downregulation of miR-145 in ASCs induced vascular network formation and neovessels incorporation in ischemic muscle in vivo 83 . Combined treatment of ASCs with VEGF and bone morphogenetic protein-4 (BMP4) under hypoxia conditions induces the differentiation of ASCs into vascular EC lineage and acquires the ability of mature EC such as tube formation, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) uptake, and nitric oxide secretion84,85. Besides, treating ASCs with TGF-β induces their differentiation into pericytes. Transdifferentiating more ASC into pericytes could enhance neovascularization in CAL 43 . Moreover, culturing ASCs with endothelial growth medium (EGM-2) in vitro and transplanting them with human umbilical vascular ECs (HUVEC) subcutaneously into immunodeficient mice increases the HUVEC survival and enhances the vasculature function 86 .
There remains uncertainty regarding the mechanism by which exogenous ASCs become involved in the angiogenesis process during CAL, particularly in the crucial early stages following surgery. Yuan et al. gave a hypothesis that exogenous ASCs in free fat transplantation may not directly engage in angiogenesis through differentiating into mature adipocytes or ECs. However, they are believed to enhance the survival rate of graft-resident interstitial cells through paracrine effects 87 . Gan et al. 38 also demonstrated that ASCs combined with EPCs enhance the function of EPCs in the fat transplant rather than directly differentiate into them. Conversely, using a tracing method to reveal the differentiation of donor ASCs in the CAL at 4 weeks after transplantation, Hong et al. 88 demonstrated that donor-derived ASC can directly differentiate into ECs and adipocytes to take part in angiogenesis. Evidence suggests that ASC-derived ECs can be assembled into newly formed vessels 89 . CD34+CD31– cells sorted from SVF cells can differentiate into ECs in vitro and incorporate into the ischemic hindlimb vasculature in vivo 90 . While intravenously injecting ASCs immediately after surgery does increase vascular density in the graft, their primary mechanism is through paracrine signaling 91 . Yan Huang et al. further demonstrated that intravenous injection of ASCs immediately after surgery and again at 2 weeks post-surgery led to increased retention of graft volume and vascular density. Simultaneously, grafts that are intravenously injected with ASC exhibit higher expression levels of CXCL12 and CXCR4 92 .
ASC-exosome is another strategy to enhance early angiogenesis. Recent research findings indicate that exosomes derived from stem cells exhibit comparable or even superior performance to that of MSCs93–95. In comparison with ASCs, ASC-exos offer several advantages. These exosomes are small extracellular vesicles (50–200 nm) that can be sterile filtered and stored as safe, ready-to-use biological products with high biological activity. Furthermore, their use circumvents issues associated with cell therapy, such as limited cell survival, senescence-induced genetic instability, and the risk of unfavorable differentiation 10 .
ASC-exos also facilitate angiogenesis within grafted adipose tissue through both direct and indirect means96–98. Directly, ASC-exos promote angiogenesis and upregulate early-stage inflammation, which is beneficial for clearing dead cells and creating a pro-regenerative environment 96 . ASC-exos enhance the proliferation, migration, and tube formation capacity of HUVEC through the HIF-1α/VEGF signaling pathway 99 . Moreover, hypoxia-treated ASC-exo contains more pro-angiogenic growth factors than normal ASC-exos 98 , which fits the microenvironment after grafting 13 . Injectable thermosensitive hydrogels show significant promise as carriers for exosomes 100 . Exosomes encapsulated within hydrogels can be utilized to regulate their release over extended periods, enhancing their therapeutic effects and efficacy 99 . Human ASCs-derived exosomes (hASC-Exos) encapsulated in PF-127 hydrogel have been shown to enhance the neovascularization of autologous fat grafts 99 .
Indirectly, ASC-exosomes may increase the vessel density and browning of WAT in grafts by inducing more M2 macrophage differentiation and suppressing M1 macrophage differentiation101–103.
Adipocytes’ Pro-angiogenic Function in Fat Grafting
Brown and Beige Adipocytes
Adipose tissue consists of three primary types of adipocytes. White adipocytes, predominant in WAT, are unilocular cells specializing in lipid storage. In contrast, beige and brown adipocytes are multilocular, mitochondria-rich cells specialized in energy dissipation through non-shivering thermogenesis 104 .
Beige adipocytes arise from subcutaneous WAT (sWAT) depots in response to β-adrenergic stimulation, dietary factors, or exposure to cold, a reversible process known as browning or beiging 105 . Although originating from myogenic transcription factor 5 (Myf5)-negative mesodermal stem cells like white adipocytes, beige adipocytes functionally resemble brown adipocytes. They possess the capacity to convert chemical energy into heat in response to specific stimuli 106 .
Transplantation of brown adipose tissue has been widely utilized in the treatment of diabetes, obesity, and their associated complications107–110, owing to the high secretion of autocrine and paracrine factors 111 . Compared with the transplantation of white adipocytes, the transplantation of rosiglitazone-induced beige adipocytes also offers metabolic benefits by alleviating obesity-induced inflammation and increasing the proportion of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) 112 . Moreover, the beigeing of perivascular adipose tissue caused by vascular injury alleviates inflammation by expressing neuregulin 4, which activates M2 macrophage polarization 113 .
Brown and beige adipocytes with a higher surface-to-volume ratio can facilitate the process of diffusion and increase the relative exposure area to oxygen114–116 (Figure 4). In comparison with traditional white adipocytes, PPAR-γ-induced beige adipocytes exhibit higher tolerance to hypoxic and inflammatory environments 115 . Beige adipose grafts are demonstrated with increased angiogenesis, recruiting fewer macrophages in the early stages, and consequently, exhibiting enhanced survival after the transplantation 115 . Overexpressing VEGF-A in adipocytes enhances its angiogenesis and induces beige fat formation in the doxycycline(dox)-inducible, VEGF-A overexpressing transgenic (VEGF-Tg) mouse model. Additionally, transplantation of subcutaneous adipose tissue from dox-inducible VEGF-Tg mice into the interscapular region of wild-type C57/BL6J mice, followed by a 3-week high-fat diet regimen, demonstrates enhanced adipocyte survival and reduced macrophage infiltration in VEGF-A-overexpressing adipose grafts 117 . Moreover, transplantation of cold-stimulated induced beige adipose tissue reveals heightened angiogenesis levels and a relatively diminished inflammatory state 116 .
Figure 4.
The difference between beige adipocyte and white adipocyte. White adipocytes are unilocular cells specializing in lipid storage with one big lipid droplet and low mitochondria density. The beige adipocytes are multiple lipid droplets with the expression of UCP1 and a high level of mitochondria density. Under hypoxia conditions, beige adipocytes show better endurance and less apoptosis compared with white adipocytes. higher surface-to-volume ratio makes it more easily to get enough blood supply and therefore more easily to survive after fat grafting. Beige adipocytes could also induce more M2 macrophage polarization. UCP1, uncoupling protein 1.
However, brown adipocytes within grafts may struggle to withstand hypoxic and ischemic conditions, leading to sustained high levels of inflammation due to the “whitening” of brown adipose tissue which results in adipocyte death and apoptosis95,118. Transplanting brown adipose tissue (BAT) typically exhibits lower retention rates compared with beige adipose tissue and even WAT, partially due to the heightened inflammatory state115,119. However, Zheng et al. 120 found that transplanting grafts that contain a mixture of BAT and WAT increased the recruitment of M2 macrophage and the expression of VEGF-A. Moreover, inducing the browning of white adipose transplant after grafting could also increase the expression of VEGF in the grafts and enhance angiogenesis 119 .
Dedifferentiated Adipocytes (DAs)
Traditional views depict adipogenic differentiation as an irreversible process where MSCs transition into mature adipocytes. Mature adipocytes were believed to possess limited plasticity, primarily responding to stimuli with changes in size rather than undergoing further dedifferentiation121,122. Through the “ceiling culture” method, mature adipocytes exhibit dedifferentiation, ultimately transforming into progenitor cells expressing markers characteristic of adipose stem cells. Similar to stem cells, these progenitor cells exhibit proliferative and redifferentiation capabilities. Additionally, they demonstrate multilineage differentiation potential, differentiating into various cell types both in vitro and in vivo123–126 (Figure 5).
Figure 5.
The pro-angiogenic function of dedifferentiated adipocyte. DAs in was founded in the SVFs in the grafts after 1 week of fat transplantation. In vitro ceiling culture also induces adipocyte dedifferentiation. With enough vascular supply, DAs could redifferentiate into mature adipocytes. DAs acquire the ability to differentiate into ECs or pericytes and also enhance the proliferation, cell migration, and tube formation of ECs through secretory proteins such as VEGF and HGF. HGF, hepatocyte growth factor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.
DAs are demonstrated to have the same adipogenesis and angiogenesis potential compared with ASCs in fat grafts 127 . DAs can promote EC tube formation in vitro and facilitate angiogenesis in ischemic hindlimbs, potentially through the secretion of factors such as VEGF-A and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF). Moreover, when co-cultured with ECs, DAs express pericyte markers. TGF-β can also induce DAs to differentiate into mural cells in vitro 128 . In 1 week after fat grafting, the mature adipocytes in grafts were found to differentiate into DAs 129 , which can also spontaneously undergo mesenchymal-to-endothelial transition and differentiate into ECs. This transition enables them to participate in neovascularization, particularly in response to BMP4 and BMP9 signaling 130 . Interestingly, host-derived adipocytes contribute to fat graft regeneration by migrating from the recipient inguinal fat pad into the grafts and undergoing dedifferentiation, which can be augmented by internal expansion to enhance the retention rate of fat grafts 131 . Moreover, given a sufficient vascular supply, DAs have the potential to undergo redifferentiation into mature adipocytes132,133, which might be a way for them to survive in the regeneration area.
Future Perspective of Vascularization in Fat Grafting
As mentioned above, timely and complete neovascularization in the grafts determines the fate of cells in the grafts. Therefore, numerous efforts have been made to enhance early-stage revascularization by adding different kinds of angiogenic cells such as EPCs, ASCs, or other in vitro QQ cultured ECs and peripheral mononuclear cells31,51,52. A more detailed understanding of the precise mechanism through which these cells integrate into the microenvironment’s vasculature after grafting, and their interactions with other progenitor cells to support adipogenesis, ECM remodeling, and adipocyte regeneration, remains a crucial focus for future research. Finding a stable source of vessel-forming progenitor cells and adding them to the grafts provides a novel strategy to rescue the ischemic microenvironment after grafting 134 . Enriching the ASCs filtered with more angiogenic potential might be another choice to get better vascularization after grafting. A subpopulation of human ASC marked by CD34+CD146+ enhances the induction of tube formation of HUVECs in vitro. Enriching fat with CD34+CD146+ ASCs shows better vascularization compared with CD34+ unsorted SVF cells 135 . Another two populations of distinct vascular stem/progenitor cells (VSPCs) are identified from the ASCs subpopulation, marked respectively by CD45–Ter119–Tie2+PDGFRa–CD31+CD105highSca1low and CD45–Ter119–Tie2+PDGFRa+CD31CD105lowSca1low. Cotransplantation of these two types of cells forms functional vessels that improve perfusion of the mouse hindlimb ischemia model. However, there is still little article reporting that applying the different angiogenic potential of ASCs in the CAL 134 . Identifying novel progenitor cells that can develop into fully functional blood vessels, continues to be a significant challenge136–138. The significant variability in angiogenic potential among identical types of progenitor cells, such as distinct subtypes of ASCs, underscores the need for further investigation136,139.
In recent years, single-cell RNA sequence (scRNA-seq) has become a popular method to detect the deconvolve tissue heterogeneity140–142. Quite a lot of studies have been applied in analyzing the cells of SVFs in the WAT and brown adipose tissue 143 . Although susceptible to certain technical noise, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) offers vital insights into cellular populations, gene expression patterns, and variations in cellular states that may occur under diverse physiological conditions141,144. It is quite useful to filter the subpopulations according to their functions in the tissue and identify more angiogenic subpopulations in the SVFs 145 . The latest spatial transcriptomic to build a high-resolution cellular map for further exploration 146 . However, there is still no research applying the scRNA-seq in fat grafting to reveal the dynamic cellular map and the function of different stem and progenitor cells.
Another emerging technology in recent years is 3D-culture in vitro, compared with cells cultured as monolayers (2D), 3D spheroids can more accurately mimic the in vivo cell growth environment while retaining their biological characteristics. 3D-cultured ASCs demonstrate increased proliferation potential and reduced senescence compared with conventional culture methods. Co-culturing 3D-cultured ASCs with HUVECs enhances their neovascularization capabilities. Employing 3D-cultured ASCs in CAL improves the survival and neovascularization of ASCs 147 .
Conclusion
This review summarizes the current knowledge about vasculature function in fat grafting as well as the different cellular compositions that improve revascularization during the process of fat regeneration. The results provide a greater understanding of the application of different cell-enrichment therapies. However, there are still a lot of unknown mechanisms for vasculature function in fat grafting 44 .
Acknowledgments
Figures in this review were created with BioRender.com. Thanks for the support of Dr. Luo for this manuscript.
Footnotes
Authors’ Note: Zhang Xining as an Independent First Author in this review.
Author Contributions: Z.X. performed the literature search and wrote the manuscript and figures. L.S. conceived the project and revised the manuscript.
Availability of data and material: The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.
Ethical Approval: This study was approved by our institutional review board.
Statement of Human and Animal Rights: This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.
Statement of Informed Consent: There are no human subjects in this article and informed consent is not applicable.
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The author(s) was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82102356), Outstanding Young Medical Talents Training Funding Project of The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University (2021J05).
ORCID iDs: Zhang Xining
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5771-451X
References
- 1. Khouri RK, Jr, Khouri RK. Current clinical applications of fat grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140(3):466e–86e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Coleman SR. Facial augmentation with structural fat grafting. Clin Plast Surg. 2006;33(4):567–77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Coleman SR. Structural fat grafting: more than a permanent filler. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(suppl 3):108S–20S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Kaoutzanis C, Xin M, Ballard TN, Welch KB, Momoh AO, Kozlow JH, Brown DL, Cederna PS, Wilkins EG. Autologous fat grafting after breast reconstruction in postmastectomy patients: complications, biopsy rates, and locoregional cancer recurrence rates. Ann Plast Surg. 2016;76(3):270–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Illouz YG. Body contouring by lipolysis: a 5-year experience with over 3000 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;72(5):591–97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Hörl HW, Feller AM, Biemer E. Technique for liposuction fat reimplantation and long-term volume evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Plast Surg. 1991;26(3):248–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Carpaneda CA, Ribeiro MT. Study of the histologic alterations and viability of the adipose graft in humans. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1993;17(1):43–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Choi M, Small K, Levovitz C, Lee C, Fadl A, Karp NS. The volumetric analysis of fat graft survival in breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(2):185–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Matsumoto D, Sato K, Gonda K, Takaki Y, Shigeura T, Sato T, Aiba-Kojima E, Iizuka F, Inoue K, Suga H, Yoshimura K. Cell-assisted lipotransfer: supportive use of human adipose-derived cells for soft tissue augmentation with lipoinjection. Tissue Eng. 2006;12(12):3375–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Limido E, Weinzierl A, Harder Y, Menger MD, Laschke MW. Fatter is better: boosting the vascularization of adipose tissue grafts. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2023;29(6):605–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Kato H, Mineda K, Eto H, Doi K, Kuno S, Kinoshita K, Kanayama K, Yoshimura K. Degeneration, regeneration, and cicatrization after fat grafting: dynamic total tissue remodeling during the first 3 months. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(3):303e–13e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Khouri RK, Jr, Khouri RE, Lujan-Hernandez JR, Khouri KR, Lancerotto L, Orgill DP. Diffusion and perfusion: the keys to fat grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014;2(9):e220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Yoshimura K, Eto H, Kato H, Doi K, Aoi N. In vivo manipulation of stem cells for adipose tissue repair/reconstruction. Regen Med. 2011;6(suppl 6):33–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Eto H, Kato H, Suga H, Aoi N, Doi K, Kuno S, Yoshimura K. The fate of adipocytes after nonvascularized fat grafting: evidence of early death and replacement of adipocytes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(5):1081–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Saunders MC, Keller JT, Dunsker SB, Mayfield FH. Survival of autologous fat grafts in humans and in mice. Connect Tissue Res. 1981;8(2):85–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Liao HT, Marra KG, Rubin JP. Application of platelet-rich plasma and platelet-rich fibrin in fat grafting: basic science and literature review. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2014;20(4):267–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Mashiko T, Yoshimura K. How does fat survive and remodel after grafting. Clin Plast Surg. 2015;42(2):181–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Shih L, Davis MJ, Winocour SJ. The science of fat grafting. Semin Plast Surg. 2020;34(1):5–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Chang CS, Lanni MA, Mirzabeigi MN, Bucky LP. Large-volume fat grafting: identifying risk factors for fat necrosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;150(5):941e–49e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Pietiläinen KH, Naukkarinen J, Rissanen A, Saharinen J, Ellonen P, Keränen H, Suomalainen A, Götz A, Suortti T, Yki-Järvinen H, Oresic M, et al. Global transcript profiles of fat in monozygotic twins discordant for BMI: pathways behind acquired obesity. PLoS Med. 2008;5(3):e51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Niu X, Zhang Y, Lai Z, Huang X, Guo L, Lu F, Yuan Y, Gao J, Chang Q. Lipolysis inhibition improves the survival of fat grafts through ameliorating lipotoxicity and inflammation. Faseb J. 2024;38(5):e23520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Niu X, Lai Z, Chen X, Lu F, Gao J, Yuan Y. A short-term high-fat diet improved the survival of fat grafts in mice by promoting macrophage infiltration and angiogenesis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:856839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Marra F, Svegliati-Baroni G. Lipotoxicity and the gut-liver axis in NASH pathogenesis. J Hepatol. 2018;68(2):280–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Mineda K, Kuno S, Kato H, Kinoshita K, Doi K, Hashimoto I, Nakanishi H, Yoshimura K. Chronic inflammation and progressive calcification as a result of fat necrosis: the worst outcome in fat grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(5):1064–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Mok H, Feng J, Hu W, Wang J, Cai J, Lu F. Decreased serum estrogen improves fat graft retention by enhancing early macrophage infiltration and inducing adipocyte hypertrophy. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;501(1):266–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Martinez-Santibañez G, Lumeng CN. Macrophages and the regulation of adipose tissue remodeling. Annu Rev Nutr. 2014;34:57–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Duffield JS, Lupher M, Thannickal VJ, Wynn TA. Host responses in tissue repair and fibrosis. Annu Rev Pathol. 2013;8:241–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Chakarov S, Lim HY, Tan L, Lim SY, See P, Lum J, Zhang XM, Foo S, Nakamizo S, Duan K, Ting Kong W, et al. Two distinct interstitial macrophage populations coexist across tissues in specific subtissular niches. Science. 2019;363(6432):eaau0964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Bi X, Li B, Zou J, Zhao J, Chen Y, Wang X, Lu F, Li Y, Dong Z, Gao J. Fascia promotes adipose tissue regeneration by improving early macrophage infiltration after fat grafting in a mouse model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;152(3):446e–57e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Dong Z, Peng Z, Chang Q, Zhan W, Zeng Z, Zhang S, Lu F. The angiogenic and adipogenic modes of adipose tissue after free fat grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(3):556e–67e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Chen Y, Wang Z, Li Y, Li B, Wang X, Zou J, Bi X, Zhao J, Lu F, Dong Z. Early angiogenesis-dependent cxcl12 attracts adipose-derived stem cells to promote the repair of fat grafting in a mouse model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023;152(2):363–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, Silver M, van der Zee R, Li T, Witzenbichler B, Schatteman G, Isner JM. Isolation of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Science. 1997;275(5302):964–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Cao Y. Angiogenesis modulates adipogenesis and obesity. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(9):2362–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Crandall DL, Hausman GJ, Kral JG. A review of the microcirculation of adipose tissue: anatomic, metabolic, and angiogenic perspectives. Microcirculation. 1997;4(2):211–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Han J, Lee JE, Jin J, Lim JS, Oh N, Kim K, Chang SI, Shibuya M, Kim H, Koh GY. The spatiotemporal development of adipose tissue. Development. 2011;138(22):5027–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Gupta RK, Mepani RJ, Kleiner S, Lo JC, Khandekar MJ, Cohen P, Frontini A, Bhowmick DC, Ye L, Cinti S, Spiegelman BM. Zfp423 expression identifies committed preadipocytes and localizes to adipose endothelial and perivascular cells. Cell Metab. 2012;15(2):230–39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Harris WM, Plastini M, Kappy N, Ortiz T, Chang S, Brown S, Carpenter JP, Zhang P. Endothelial differentiated adipose-derived stem cells improvement of survival and neovascularization in fat transplantation. Aesthet Surg J. 2019;39(2):220–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Gan F, Liu L, Zhou Q, Huang W, Huang X, Zhao X. Effects of adipose-derived stromal cells and endothelial progenitor cells on adipose transplant survival and angiogenesis. PLoS ONE. 2022;17(1):e0261498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Rautiainen S, Laaksonen T, Koivuniemi R. Angiogenic effects and crosstalk of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem/stromal cells and their extracellular vesicles with endothelial cells. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(19):10890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Picoli CC, Birbrair A, Li Z. Pericytes as the orchestrators of vasculature and adipogenesis. Genes. 2024;15(1):126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Min SY, Kady J, Nam M, Rojas-Rodriguez R, Berkenwald A, Kim JH, Noh HL, Kim JK, Cooper MP, Fitzgibbons T, Brehm MA, et al. Human “brite/beige” adipocytes develop from capillary networks, and their implantation improves metabolic homeostasis in mice. Nat Med. 2016;22(3):312–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Jiang Y, Berry DC, Tang W, Graff JM. Independent stem cell lineages regulate adipose organogenesis and adipose homeostasis. Cell Rep. 2014;9(3):1007–22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Cai Z, Li Z, Wei Q, Yang F, Li T, Ke C, He Y, Wang J, Ni B, Lin M, Li L. MiR-24-3p regulates the differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells toward pericytes and promotes fat grafting vascularization. FASEB J. 2023;37(5):e22935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Cao Y. Angiogenesis and vascular functions in modulation of obesity, adipose metabolism, and insulin sensitivity. Cell Metab. 2013;18(4):478–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Borges J, Müller MC, Momeni A, Stark GB, Torio-Padron N. In vitro analysis of the interactions between preadipocytes and endothelial cells in a 3D fibrin matrix. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2007;16(3):141–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Fukumura D, Ushiyama A, Duda DG, Xu L, Tam J, Krishna V, Chatterjee K, Garkavtsev I, Jain RK. Paracrine regulation of angiogenesis and adipocyte differentiation during in vivo adipogenesis. Circ Res. 2003;93(9):e88–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Castellot JJ, Jr, Karnovsky MJ, Spiegelman BM. Differentiation-dependent stimulation of neovascularization and endothelial cell chemotaxis by 3T3 adipocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982;79(18):5597–601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Rossatti B. Revascularisation and phagocytosis in free fat autografts: an experimental study. Br J Plast Surg. 1960;13:35–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Yi C, Pan Y, Zhen Y, Zhang L, Zhang X, Shu M, Han Y, Guo S. Enhancement of viability of fat grafts in nude mice by endothelial progenitor cells. Dermatol Surg. 2006;32(12):1437–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Sunaga A, Sugawara Y, Katsuragi-Tomioka Y, Kobayashi E. The fate of nonvascularized fat grafts: histological and bioluminescent study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2013;1(6):e40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Geeroms M, Fujimura S, Aiba E, Orgun D, Arita K, Kitamura R, Senda D, Mizuno H, Hamdi M, Tanaka R. Quality and quantity-cultured human mononuclear cells improve human fat graft vascularization and survival in an in vivo murine experimental model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;147(2):373–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Geeroms M, Hamdi M, Hirano R, Hagiwara H, Fujimura S, Mizuno H, Tanaka R. Quality and quantity-cultured murine endothelial progenitor cells increase vascularization and decrease fibrosis in the fat graft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(4):744e–55e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Masuda H, Iwasaki H, Kawamoto A, Akimaru H, Ishikawa M, Ii M, Shizuno T, Sato A, Ito R, Horii M, Ishida H, et al. Development of serum-free quality and quantity control culture of colony-forming endothelial progenitor cell for vasculogenesis. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2012;1(2):160–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Willenborg S, Lucas T, van Loo G, Knipper JA, Krieg T, Haase I, Brachvogel B, Hammerschmidt M, Nagy A, Ferrara N, Pasparakis M. CCR2 recruits an inflammatory macrophage subpopulation critical for angiogenesis in tissue repair. Blood. 2012;120(3):613–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Arnold L, Henry A, Poron F, Baba-Amer Y, van Rooijen N, Plonquet A, Gherardi RK, Chazaud B. Inflammatory monocytes recruited after skeletal muscle injury switch into antiinflammatory macrophages to support myogenesis. J Exp Med. 2007;204(5):1057–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Kong X, Gao J. Macrophage polarization: a key event in the secondary phase of acute spinal cord injury. J Cell Mol Med. 2017;21(5):941–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Graney PL, Ben-Shaul S, Landau S, Bajpai A, Singh B, Eager J, Cohen A, Levenberg S, Spiller KL. Macrophages of diverse phenotypes drive vascularization of engineered tissues. Sci Adv. 2020;6(18):eaay6391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Spiller KL, Anfang RR, Spiller KJ, Ng J, Nakazawa KR, Daulton JW, Vunjak-Novakovic G. The role of macrophage phenotype in vascularization of tissue engineering scaffolds. Biomaterials. 2014;35(15):4477–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Wang Z, Chen Y, Zhu S, Chen X, Guan J, Yao Y, Wang X, Li Y, Lu F, Gao J, Dong Z. The effects of macrophage-mediated inflammatory response to the donor site on long-term retention of a fat graft in the recipient site in a mice model. J Cell Physiol. 2020;235(12):10012–23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Kim SY, Nair MG. Macrophages in wound healing: activation and plasticity. Immunol Cell Biol. 2019;97(3):258–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Cheng H, Luan J, Mu D, Wang Q, Qi J, Li Z, Fu S. M1/M2 macrophages play different roles in adipogenic differentiation of PDGFRα(+) preadipocytes in vitro. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2019;43(2):514–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Satoh T, Kidoya H, Naito H, Yamamoto M, Takemura N, Nakagawa K, Yoshioka Y, Morii E, Takakura N, Takeuchi O, Akira S. Critical role of Trib1 in differentiation of tissue-resident M2-like macrophages. Nature. 2013;495(7442):524–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Arroyo AG, Iruela-Arispe ML. Extracellular matrix, inflammation, and the angiogenic response. Cardiovasc Res. 2010;86(2):226–35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Senger DR, Ledbetter SR, Claffey KP, Papadopoulos-Sergiou A, Peruzzi CA, Detmar M. Stimulation of endothelial cell migration by vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor through cooperative mechanisms involving the alphavbeta3 integrin, osteopontin, and thrombin. Am J Pathol. 1996;149(1):293–305. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Novak ML, Koh TJ. Macrophage phenotypes during tissue repair. J Leukoc Biol. 2013;93(6):875–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Arabpour M, Saghazadeh A, Rezaei N. Anti-inflammatory and M2 macrophage polarization-promoting effect of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes. Int Immunopharmacol. 2021;97:107823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Dang J, Yu Z, Wang T, Jiao Y, Wang K, Dou W, Yi C, Song B. Effects of melatonin on fat graft retention through browning of adipose tissue and alternative macrophage polarization. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023;47(4):1578–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Cai J, Feng J, Liu K, Zhou S, Lu F. Early macrophage infiltration improves fat graft survival by inducing angiogenesis and hematopoietic stem cell recruitment. Plast Reconst Surg. 2018;141(2):376–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Hamed S, Egozi D, Dawood H, Keren A, Kruchevsky D, Ben-Nun O, Gilhar A, Brenner B, Ullmann Y. The chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1α promotes endothelial progenitor cell-mediated neovascularization of human transplanted fat tissue in diabetic immunocompromised mice. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(2):239e–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Phipps KD, Gebremeskel S, Gillis J, Hong P, Johnston B, Bezuhly M. Alternatively activated M2 macrophages improve autologous Fat Graft survival in a mouse model through induction of angiogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(1):140–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Weissman IL. Stem cells are units of natural selection for tissue formation, for germline development, and in cancer development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(29):8922–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Zuk PA, Zhu M, Mizuno H, Huang J, Futrell JW, Katz AJ, Benhaim P, Lorenz HP, Hedrick MH. Multilineage cells from human adipose tissue: implications for cell-based therapies. Tissue Eng. 2001;7(2):211–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Zuk PA, Zhu M, Ashjian P, De Ugarte DA, Huang JI, Mizuno H, Alfonso ZC, Fraser JK, Benhaim P, Hedrick MH. Human adipose tissue is a source of multipotent stem cells. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13(12):4279–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Yi Y, Hu W, Zhao C, Wu M, Zeng H, Xiong M, Lv W, Wu Y, Zhang Q. Deciphering the emerging roles of adipocytes and adipose-derived stem cells in fat transplantation. Cell Transplant. 2021;30:963689721997799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Lu F, Li J, Gao J, Ogawa R, Ou C, Yang B, Fu B. Improvement of the survival of human autologous fat transplantation by using VEGF-transfected adipose-derived stem cells. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(5):1437–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Yoshimura K, Sato K, Aoi N, Kurita M, Hirohi T, Harii K. Cell-assisted lipotransfer for cosmetic breast augmentation: supportive use of adipose-derived stem/stromal cells. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2020;44(4):1258–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Pérez-Gutiérrez L, Ferrara N. Biology and therapeutic targeting of vascular endothelial growth factor A. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2023;24(11):816–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Ferrara N, Gerber HP, LeCouter J. The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat Med. 2003;9(6):669–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Benjamin LE, Keshet E. Conditional switching of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression in tumors: induction of endothelial cell shedding and regression of hemangioblastoma-like vessels by VEGF withdrawal. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(16):8761–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Chen J, Gu Z, Wu M, Yang Y, Zhang J, Ou J, Zuo Z, Wang J, Chen Y. C-reactive protein can upregulate VEGF expression to promote ADSC-induced angiogenesis by activating HIF-1α via CD64/PI3k/Akt and MAPK/ERK signaling pathways. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016;7(1):114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Lee CK, Park BY, Jo T, Park CH, Kim JH, Chung KJ, Kim YH, Park DY, Kim IK. Dll4 inhibition promotes graft retention in fat grafting enriched with adipose-derived stem cells. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2022;11(7):742–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Jie X, Hu H, Nie B, Zhu L, Jiang H, Liu A. Effects of miR126 expressing adipose-derived stem cells on fat graft survival and angiogenesis. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023;47(2):825–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Arderiu G, Peña E, Aledo R, Juan-Babot O, Crespo J, Vilahur G, Oñate B, Moscatiello F, Badimon L. MicroRNA-145 regulates the differentiation of adipose stem cells toward microvascular endothelial cells and promotes angiogenesis. Circ Res. 2019;125(1):74–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Shang T, Li S, Zhang Y, Lu L, Cui L, Guo FF. Hypoxia promotes differentiation of adipose-derived stem cells into endothelial cells through demethylation of ephrinB2. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Chen X, Yan L, Guo Z, Chen Z, Chen Y, Li M, Huang C, Zhang X, Chen L. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells promote the survival of fat grafts via crosstalk between the Nrf2 and TLR4 pathways. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7(9):e2369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Souza LEB, Beckenkamp LR, Sobral LM, Fantacini DMC, Melo FUF, Borges JS, Leopoldino AM, Kashima S, Covas DT. Pre-culture in endothelial growth medium enhances the angiogenic properties of adipose-derived stem/stromal cells. Angiogenesis. 2018;21(1):15–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Yuan Y, Gao J, Liu L, Lu F. Role of adipose-derived stem cells in enhancing angiogenesis early after aspirated fat transplantation: induction or differentiation? Cell Biol Int. 2013;37(6):547–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Hong KY, Yim S, Kim HJ, Jin US, Lim S, Eo S, Chang H, Minn KW. The fate of the adipose-derived stromal cells during angiogenesis and adipogenesis after cell-assisted lipotransfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018;141(2):365–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. AlZaim I, de Rooij LPMH, Sheikh BN, Börgeson E, Kalucka J. The evolving functions of the vasculature in regulating adipose tissue biology in health and obesity. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2023;19(12):691–707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Miranville A, Heeschen C, Sengenès C, Curat CA, Busse R, Bouloumié A. Improvement of postnatal neovascularization by human adipose tissue-derived stem cells. Circulation. 2004;110(3):349–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Hong KY, Kim IK, Park SO, Jin US, Chang H. Systemic administration of adipose-derived stromal cells concurrent with fat grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;143(5):973e–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Huang Y, Jin X, Hong KY, Chang H. Enhanced effect of secondary administration of adipose-derived stromal cells concurrent with fat grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024;153(2):390–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Yang S, Zhu B, Yin P, Zhao L, Wang Y, Fu Z, Dang R, Xu J, Zhang J, Wen N. Integration of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells-derived exosomes with hydroxyapatite-embedded hyaluronic acid-alginate hydrogel for bone regeneration. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020;6(3):1590–1602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Yu M, Liu W, Li J, Lu J, Lu H, Jia W, Liu F. Exosomes derived from atorvastatin-pretreated MSC accelerate diabetic wound repair by enhancing angiogenesis via AKT/eNOS pathway. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020;11(1):350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Wei W, Ao Q, Wang X, Cao Y, Liu Y, Zheng SG, Tian X. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes: a promising biological tool in nanomedicine. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:590470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Chen B, Cai J, Wei Y, Jiang Z, Desjardins HE, Adams AE, Li S, Kao HK, Guo L. Exosomes are comparable to source adipose stem cells in fat graft retention with up-regulating early inflammation and angiogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(5):816e–27e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Chen K, Xiong J, Xu S, Wu M, Xue C, Wu M, Lv C, Wang Y. Adipose-derived stem cells exosomes improve fat graft survival by promoting prolipogenetic abilities through Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Stem Cells Int. 2022;2022:5014895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Han YD, Bai Y, Yan XL, Ren J, Zeng Q, Li XD, Pei XT, Han Y. Co-transplantation of exosomes derived from hypoxia-preconditioned adipose mesenchymal stem cells promotes neovascularization and graft survival in fat grafting. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2018;497(1):305–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Yang F, Li Z, Cai Z, He Y, Ke C, Wang J, Lin M, Li L. Pluronic F-127 hydrogel loaded with human adipose-derived stem cell-derived exosomes improve fat graft survival via HIF-1α-mediated enhancement of angiogenesis. Int J Nanomedicine. 2023;18:6781–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Ruel-Gariépy E, Leroux JC. In situ-forming hydrogels–review of temperature-sensitive systems. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2004;58(2):409–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Zhu YZ, Zhang J, Hu X, Wang ZH, Wu S, Yi YY. Supplementation with extracellular vesicles derived from adipose-derived stem cells increases fat graft survival and browning in mice: a cell-free approach to construct beige fat from white fat grafting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(5):1183–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Mantovani A, Biswas SK, Galdiero MR, Sica A, Locati M. Macrophage plasticity and polarization in tissue repair and remodelling. J Pathol. 2013;229(2):176–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Murray PJ, Wynn TA. Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11(11):723–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Wolfrum C, Gerhart-Hines Z. Fueling the fire of adipose thermogenesis. Science. 2022;375(6586):1229–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Harms M, Seale P. Brown and beige fat: development, function and therapeutic potential. Nat Med. 2013;19(10):1252–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Stanford KI, Middelbeek RJ, Goodyear LJ. Exercise effects on white adipose tissue: beiging and metabolic adaptations. Diabetes. 2015;64(7):2361–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Zhang Y, Cai Y, Zhang H, Zhang J, Zeng Y, Fan C, Zou S, Wu C, Fang S, Li P, Lin X, et al. Brown adipose tissue transplantation ameliorates diabetic nephropathy through the miR-30b pathway by targeting Runx1. Metabolism. 2021;125:154916. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Stanford KI, Middelbeek RJ, Townsend KL, An D, Nygaard EB, Hitchcox KM, Markan KR, Nakano K, Hirshman MF, Tseng YH, Goodyear LJ. Brown adipose tissue regulates glucose homeostasis and insulin sensitivity. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(1):215–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Quan Y, Li J, Cai J, Liao Y, Zhang Y, Lu F. Transplantation of beige adipose organoids fabricated using adipose acellular matrix hydrogel improves metabolic dysfunction in high-fat diet-induced obesity and type 2 diabetes mice. J Cell Physiol. 2024;239:e31191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Quan Y, Lu F, Zhang Y. Use of brown adipose tissue transplantation and engineering as a thermogenic therapy in obesity and metabolic disease. Obes Rev. 2023;25:e13677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Villarroya F, Cereijo R, Villarroya J, Giralt M. Brown adipose tissue as a secretory organ. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017;13(1):26–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Zhang WC, Qin F, Wang XJ, Liu ZF, Zhu L, Zeng A, Zhang MZ, Yu NZ, Long X. Adipose-derived stromal cells attenuate adipose inflammation in obesity through adipocyte browning and polarization of M2 macrophages. Mediators Inflamm. 2019;2019:1731540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Adachi Y, Ueda K, Nomura S, Ito K, Katoh M, Katagiri M, Yamada S, Hashimoto M, Zhai B, Numata G, Otani A, et al. Beiging of perivascular adipose tissue regulates its inflammation and vascular remodeling. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):5117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Koseki K, Suzuki H. Deformation dynamics of giant unilamellar vesicles in the large surface-to-volume ratio regime: the emergence of neuron-like morphology. Langmuir. 2020;36(22):6238–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Jiang S, Lin J, Zhang Q, Liao Y, Lu F, Cai J. The fates of different types of adipose tissue after transplantation in mice. FASEB J. 2022;36(9):e22510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Luo Y, Ma W, Cheng S, Yuan T, Li J, Hao H, Liu K, Zeng M, Pan Y. Transplantation of cold-stimulated subcutaneous adipose tissue improves fat retention and recipient metabolism. Aesthet Surg J. 2024;44(7):NP486-NP500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Park J, Kim M, Sun K, An YA, Gu X, Scherer PE. VEGF-A–expressing adipose tissue shows rapid beiging and enhanced survival after transplantation and confers IL-4–independent metabolic improvements. Diabetes. 2017;66(6):1479–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Kotzbeck P, Giordano A, Mondini E, Murano I, Severi I, Venema W, Cecchini MP, Kershaw EE, Barbatelli G, Haemmerle G, Zechner R, et al. Brown adipose tissue whitening leads to brown adipocyte death and adipose tissue inflammation. J Lipid Res. 2018;59(5):784–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Lin J, Zhu S, Liao Y, Liang Z, Quan Y, He Y, Cai J, Lu F. Spontaneous browning of white adipose tissue improves angiogenesis and reduces macrophage infiltration after fat grafting in mice. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022;10:845158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Zheng Y, Li H, Bao Q, Tu Y, Ye Y, Jia W, Cao D. Brown adipose tissue promotes autologous fat grafts retention possibly through inhibiting Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024;48(9):1817–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Sakers A, De Siqueira MK, Seale P, Villanueva CJ. Adipose-tissue plasticity in health and disease. Cell. 2022;185(3):419–46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Ghaben AL, Scherer PE. Adipogenesis and metabolic health. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20(4):242–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Sugihara H, Yonemitsu N, Miyabara S, Toda S. Proliferation of unilocular fat cells in the primary culture. J Lipid Res. 1987;28(9):1038–45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Sugihara H, Yonemitsu N, Miyabara S, Yun K. Primary cultures of unilocular fat cells: characteristics of growth in vitro and changes in differentiation properties. Differentiation. 1986;31(1):42–49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Matsumoto T, Kano K, Kondo D, Fukuda N, Iribe Y, Tanaka N, Matsubara Y, Sakuma T, Satomi A, Otaki M, Ryu J, et al. Mature adipocyte-derived dedifferentiated fat cells exhibit multilineage potential. J Cell Physiol. 2008;215(1):210–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. He Y, Liang Z, Wang J, Tang H, Li J, Cai J, Liao Y. Ceiling culture of human mature white adipocytes with a browning agent: a novel approach to induce transdifferentiation into beige adipocytes. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:905194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Zhu J, Zhao F, Chai Y, Jia X, Li F. Evaluating the efficacy of dedifferentiated fat cells (DFATs) vs adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) in enhancing the viability of fat grafts. Aesthet Surg J. 2023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Watanabe H, Goto S, Kato R, Komiyama S, Nagaoka Y, Kazama T, Yamamoto C, Li Y, Konuma N, Hagikura K, Matsumoto T. The neovascularization effect of dedifferentiated fat cells. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):9211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Chai Y, Chen Y, Yin B, Zhang X, Han X, Cai L, Yin N, Li F. Dedifferentiation of human adipocytes after fat transplantation. Aesthet Surg J. 2022;42(6):NP423–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Jumabay M, Abdmaulen R, Urs S, Heydarkhan-Hagvall S, Chazenbalk GD, Jordan MC, Roos KP, Yao Y, Boström KI. Endothelial differentiation in multipotent cells derived from mouse and human white mature adipocytes. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2012;53(6):790–800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. He Y, Liang Z, Tang H, Li J, Ma J, Shi J, Cai J, Liao Y. Physical expansion preconditioning promotes host-derived adipocyte dedifferentiation and migration into fat grafts in A murine model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Chan CW, McCulley SJ, Macmillan RD. Autologous fat transfer: a review of the literature with a focus on breast cancer surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008;61(12):1438–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Ellenbogen R. Autologous fat injection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991;88(3):543–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Zhao L, Lee AS, Sasagawa K, Sokol J, Wang Y, Ransom RC, Zhao X, Ma C, Steininger HM, Koepke LS, Borrelli MR, et al. A combination of distinct vascular stem/progenitor cells for neovascularization and ischemic rescue. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2023;43(7):1262–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Borrelli MR, Patel RA, Blackshear C, Vistnes S, Diaz Deleon NM, Adem S, Shen AH, Sokol J, Momeni A, Nguyen D, Longaker MT, et al. CD34+CD146+ adipose-derived stromal cells enhance engraftment of transplanted fat. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2020;9(11):1389–1400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Chan CK, Lindau P, Jiang W, Chen JY, Zhang LF, Chen CC, Seita J, Sahoo D, Kim JB, Lee A, Park S, et al. Clonal precursor of bone, cartilage, and hematopoietic niche stromal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(31):12643–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Wang D, Li LK, Dai T, Wang A, Li S. Adult stem cells in vascular remodeling. Theranostics. 2018;8(3):815–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Yoder MC. Endothelial stem and progenitor cells (stem cells): (2017 Grover Conference Series). Pulm Circ. 2018;8(1):2045893217743950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Fang JS, Dai C, Kurjiaka DT, Burt JM, Hirschi KK. Connexin45 regulates endothelial-induced mesenchymal cell differentiation toward a mural cell phenotype. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33(2):362–68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Papalexi E, Satija R. Single-cell RNA sequencing to explore immune cell heterogeneity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2018;18(1):35–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Kalisky T, Oriel S, Bar-Lev TH, Ben-Haim N, Trink A, Wineberg Y, Kanter I, Gilad S, Pyne S. A brief review of single-cell transcriptomic technologies. Brief Funct Genomics. 2018;17(1):64–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Trapnell C. Defining cell types and states with single-cell genomics. Genome Res. 2015;25(10):1491–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Burl RB, Ramseyer VD, Rondini EA, Pique-Regi R, Lee YH, Granneman JG. Deconstructing adipogenesis induced by β3-adrenergic receptor activation with single-cell expression profiling. Cell Metab. 2018;28(2):300–3094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. AlJanahi AA, Danielsen M, Dunbar CE. An introduction to the analysis of single-cell RNA-sequencing data. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2018;10:189–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145. Rondini EA, Granneman JG. Single cell approaches to address adipose tissue stromal cell heterogeneity. Biochem J. 2020;477(3):583–600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Massier L, Jalkanen J, Elmastas M, Zhong J, Wang T, Nono Nankam PA, Frendo-Cumbo S, Bäckdahl J, Subramanian N, Sekine T, Kerr AG, et al. An integrated single cell and spatial transcriptomic map of human white adipose tissue. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):1438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. He Y, Zhang Z, Li Z, Lin M, Ding S, Wu H, Yang F, Cai Z, Li T, Wang J, Ke C, et al. Three-dimensional spheroid formation of adipose-derived stem cells improves the survival of fat transplantation by enhance their therapeutic effect. Biotechnol J. 2023;18(10):e2300021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]






