Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 26;21:61. doi: 10.1186/s12987-024-00556-2

Table 4.

Parametric comparison in terms of change in %ID to eaCSF at three hours

Parameter Protocols Range %ID to eaCSF at 3 h Δ%ID P value
Location 2NHP2 vs. 3G1 L4/L5 vs. 3/L4 8.2 vs. 18.7  + 10.5% 0.0282
Flush volume 1NHP2 vs. 2G2 0 vs. 1.5 (ml) 2.8 vs. 9.3  + 6.5% 0.0218
Bolus volume 1NHP1 vs. 3G2 1 vs. 2 (ml) 7.2 vs. 9.5  + 2.3% 0.1910
Bolus rate 1NHP3 vs. 1NHP2 0.1 vs. 1 (ml/min) 3.0 vs. 2.8 − 0.2% 0.5283
Flush rate 5NHP1 vs. 2G2 0.5 vs. 1 (ml/min) 9.7 vs.9.3 − 0.4% 0.910