Table 2.
Data of tick samples collected in Vietnam, listed according to tick species
| Year | Data of collection | Rhipicephalus microplus | Rh. linnaei | Rh. haema-physaloides | Amblyomma integrum | Haemaphysalis cornigera | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Province | Host | n = | Month | Larva | Nymph | Male | Female | Infestation intensity | Nymph | Male | Female | Female | Female | Female | |
| 2022 | Ha Noi | Cattle | 11 | July | – | 7 | 16 | 132 | 14.1 | – | 1* | – | – | – | – |
| Cattle | 2 | Sept | – | – | 1 | 6 | 3.5 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Cattle | 1 | Dec | – | – | – | 9 | 9 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Son La | Cattle | 1 | July | – | – | – | 33 | 33 | – | – | – | – | – | 2* | |
| Thai Nguyen | Dog | 1 | July | – | – | – | – | – | 3 | 43** | 25** | – | – | – | |
| Cattle | 1 | July | 2 | 3 | 34 | 114 | 153 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Cattle | 3 | Dec | – | – | 9 | 45 | 18 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| 2023 | Son La | Cattle | 11 | Jan | – | 5 | 15* | 104* | 11.3 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Cattle | 3 | Apr | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 2** | 1* | – | ||
| Ha Noi | Cattle | 24 | Apr | 5 | 80 | 192** | 553 | 34.6 | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Buffalo | 1 | Apr | – | – | – | 2 | 2 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Thai Nguyen | Cattle | 2 | March | 3 | 245 | 2 | 7 | 128.5 | 1 | – | – | – | – | – | |
| Cattle | 1 | Apr | – | 1 | 7 | 5 | 13 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Buffalo | 4 | Apr | – | – | – | 73 | 18.3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| In total from all hosts | 66 | 10 | 341 | 276 | 1083 | – | 4 | 44 | 25 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |||
Infestation intensity was only estimated for Rhipicephalus microplus
*Molecularly also identified (the number of asterisks indicates the number of specimens analyzed with PCR and sequencing)