Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 28.
Published in final edited form as: Contraception. 2016 Jul 18;94(6):650–667. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.07.011

Table 4.

Evidence table for use of oral benzodiazepines with hormonal contraceptives

Author, year, funding source Design Study population Exposure Psychotropic drug Exposure Contraceptive Outcomes Results Strengths Limitations Quality
Clinical studies for oral benzodiazepines
Kroboth 1985
 Upjohn Company
Secondary outcome of parallel PK study Women on COCs (n=19) vs not taking COCs (n=21) (matched by age, weight, smoking status) Single oral doses of either: triazolam 0.5 mg and temazepam 30 or alprazolam 1 mg and lorazepam 2 mg, dosed 28 days apart COCs with 35 mcg EE or less Psychomotor impairment, sleepiness scale, nurse rated sedation scale, memory (recall/recognition) ALP, LOR, and TRZ produced greater psychomotor performance impairment in the OC users. No difference in sedation or memory. Not blinded
Same study as Stoehr et al., reported number of subjects inverted for OC/control groups
Not powered for clinical outcomes
Fair
Somos 1990
 Funding not stated
Observational Healthy women on COCs (n=72) who also took a concurrent sedative or hypnotic Diazepam (5 mg), nitrazepam (5–10 mg), chlordiazepoxide (5 mg), meprobamate (200 mg) taken consistently over 14 days to 2 months COCs with 50 mcg EE or less and LNG Breakthrough bleeding (BTB), pregnancy BTB in 36.1% of women, no pregnancies.
Most BTB occurred with chlordiazepoxide (12/19) and meprobamate (11/17). One of 15 women on diazepam and 2/21 on nitrazepam experienced BTB.
Did not control dose or duration of use of benzodiazepines. No statistics performed.
Follow up duration not clear. Baseline bleeding retrospective and descriptive limiting ability to compare outcomes with/without benzo
Poor
PK studies for oral benzodiazepines
Abernathy 1983
 US Public Health Service
PK Parallel Healthy women on COC (n=17) vs not on COCs (n=14) (age 19–37; matched by smoking) Single dose of 30 mg oral oxazepam (cycle day not specified) COCs with 50 mcg EE or less Oxazepam VD, t1/2
clearance, free fraction in plasma over 48 h
No significant difference in any measures No report of AUC, tmax, Cmax.
OC formulation varied and unspecified.
Fair
Patwardhan 1983
Veterans Administration and NIH
PK Parallel Healthy women on COCs (n=5) vs not taking COCs (n=6) (age 21–33) Single dose of 45 mg oral oxazepam (cycle day not specified) Norethindrone 1 mg and EE 50 mcg Oxazepam Vd, t1/2, clearance over 48 h OZM-t1/2 ↓NS
Clearance ↑ 157% (p<.01)
Vd higher (NS)
No report of AUC, tmax, Cmax
Small sample size
Fair
Stoehr 1984
 Upjohn Company
PK Parallel Women on COCs (n=19) vs not taking COCs (n=21) (matched by age, weight, smoking status) Single oral doses of either: triazolam 0.5 mg and temazepam 30 or alprazolam 1 mg and lorazepam 2 mg, dosed 28 days apart COCs with 35 mcg EE or less Benzodiaz.
Vd, t1/2, AUC, elimination constant, clearance, Cmax, tmax
No changes except where noted
TRZ: no change
TMZ: AUC down from 9600 ng/ml*h. control to 5840 ng/ml*h. OCs, p<.05), elimination constant up from 0.052 h−1 control to 0.087 h−1 OCs, p<.005.
ALP: AUC
control-241 ng/ml*h.
COC-326 ng/ml*h. p<.01,
elimination constant Control-9.6 h−1 COC-12.4 h−1, p<.005.
LOR: elimination constant Control-0.042 h−1
COC-0.054 h−1, p<.025.
Included AUC, tmax, Cmax
Groups matched
Fair
Scavone 1988
 US Department of HHS
PK Parallel Healthy women on COCs (n=16) vs not taking COCs (n=23) (matched by age and weight,) Single dose of 1 mg oral alprazolam (cycle day not specified) COCs with 50 mcg EE or less Alprazolam AUC, t1/2, Vd, free fraction, clearance over 48 h No significant difference in AUC, t1/2, Vd, clearance. Free fraction (% unbound) slightly higher in COC users. Cmax, tmax not reported Fair

ALP, alprazolam; Cmax, maximum concentration; LOR, lorazepam; t1/2, half life; tmax, time to maximum concentration; TMZ, temazepam; TRZ, triazolam; Vd, volume of distribution.