Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 28;5(1):e416. doi: 10.1002/deo2.416

TABLE 1.

Univariate analysis of the relation between patients’ background, clinical characteristics, clinical outcomes, and lens cloudiness.

Total (n = 220) Grade 1/2 (n = 60) Grade 0 (n = 160) p‐value
Characteristics
Age (years.), median [IQR] 76.0 [71.0, 82.0] 76.0 [72.0, 82.0] 76.0 [70.3, 82.0] 0.4937
Sex (male), n (%) 137 (62.3%) 41 (68.3%) 96 (60.0%) 0.2523
BMI, median [IQR] 23.1 [20.7, 25.6] 23.8 [20.8, 25.2] 23.0 [20.7, 26.0] 0.8379
Diabetes mellitus, n (%) 50 (22.7%) 14 (23.3%) 36 (22.5%) 0.8957
Hypertension, n (%) 149 (67.7%) 40 (66.7%) 109 (68.1%) 0.8370
Hyperlipidemia, n (%) 98 (44.5%) 32 (53.3%) 66 (41.3%) 0.1090
Organ, n (%)
Stomach 96 (43.6%) 42 (70.0%) 54 (33.7%) <0.0001 *
Colon 124 (56.4%) 18 (30.0%) 106 (66.3%)
Location (stomach), n (%)
Upper part 23 (24.0%) 15 (35.7%) 8 (14.8%) 0.0017 *
Middle part 34 (35.4%) 18 (42.9%) 16 (29.6%)
Lower part 39 (40.6%) 9 (21.4%) 30 (55.6%)
Location (colon), n (%)
Right‐sided 72 (58.1%) 11 (61.1%) 61 (57.5%) 0.7763
Left‐sided 52 (41.9%) 7 (38.9%) 45 (42.5%)
Tumor size (mm), median [IQR] 22.0 [18.3, 29.0] 22.5 [15.0, 31.8] 22.0 [20.0, 28.0] 0.8890
Submucosal fatty tissue, n (%)
Grade 0/1 141 (64.1%) 16 (26.7%) 125 (78.1%) <0.0001 *
Grade 2 79 (35.9%) 44 (73.3%) 35 (21.9%)
Lens cleaner, n (%)
Cleastay 71 (32.3%) 6 (10.0%) 65 (40.6%) <0.0001 *
Cleash 149 (67.7%) 54 (90.0%) 95 (59.4%)
Endoscopist, expert, n (%) 87 (39.5%) 14 (23.3%) 73 (45.6%) 0.0020 *
Outcomes
Procedure time (min), median [IQR] 60.0 [40.0, 94.8] 86.0 [58.0, 103.8] 51.0 [36.3, 80.0] <0.0001 *
En bloc resection, n (%) 218 (99.1%) 58 (96.7%) 160 (100%) 0.0735
Histologic complete resection, n (%) 210 (95.5%) 51 (85.0%) 159 (99.4%) <0.0001 *
Adverse events, n (%) 5 (2.3%) 5 (8.3%) 0 (0%) 0.0013 *

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; IQR, interquartile range.

Adverse events: perforation in three patients and delayed bleeding in two patients in the Cleash group.

p < 0.05.