Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 29;47(1):366. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02592-w

Table 3.

This figure delineates a comparison of epidemiological data, pre-existing conditions, rupture status, aneurysm multiplicity, aneurysm size and irregularity, along with median Hunt and Hess scores and Fisher grades for ruptured AcomA across the matched cohort

Interhemispheric approach (n = 14) Pterional approach (n = 14) Statistical analysis
Gender 2 male; 12 female 2 male; 12 female p = 0.702****
Age at surgery (mean) 53.1 years 56 years p = 0.511***
Hypertension 5 (35.7%) 6 (42.9%) p = 0.5****
Diabetes mellitus 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Peripheral arterial disease 1 (7%) 0 (0%) p = 0.5****
Heart disease 3 (21.4%) 2 (14.3%) p = 0.5****
Ischaemic stroke 3 (21.4%) 0 (0%) p = 0.111****
Thrombosis 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Obesity 1 (7%) 1 (7%) p = 0.759****
Nicotine abuse 5 (35.7%) 5 (35.7%) p = 0.653****
Alcohol abuse 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Ruptured aneurysms 7 (50%) 7 (50%) p = 0.647****
Multiple aneurysms 5 (35.7%) 4 (28.6%) p = 0.5****
Aneurysm size (mean) 10 mm 6.3 mm p = 0.802***
Aneurysm irregularity 3 (21.4%) 6 (42.5%) p = 0.21****
Hunt and Hess score (median) 1 2 p = 0.632**
Fisher grade (median) 3 2 p = 0.254**

Included are tests to evaluate differences between cohorts using the Mann–Whitney-U-test(**), t-test (***)and Exact-Fisher-test(****)