Table 4.
PROMIS computer adaptive tests | Same PRO, same PROM |
Same PRO, different PROMa |
Different PRO, same PROM |
Different PRO, different PROM |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reliability coefficient | Corr. b | Min corr. b | Max corr. b | Min corr. b | Max corr. b | |
Physical function | 0.96 | 0.92 | 0.39 | 0.76 | 0.35 | 0.74 |
Pain interference | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.22 | 0.69 |
Fatigue | 0.96 | 0.86 | 0.51 | 0.66 | 0.23 | 0.69 |
Anxiety | 0.94 | 0.67 | 0.41 | 0.74 | 0.09 | 0.58 |
Depression | 0.93 | 0.71 | 0.39 | 0.74 | 0.17 | 0.58 |
Ability to participate in social roles and activities | 0.95 | 0.67 | 0.51 | 0.69 | 0.30 | 0.67 |
CAT, computer adaptive test; corr., correlation; Max, maximum; Min; PRO, patient-reported outcomes; PROM, patient-reported outcomes measures; PROMIS, patient-reported outcomes measurement information system; SF-36v2, Short Form-36 version 2.
CAT physical function was compared with SF-36v2 physical functioning, CAT pain interference was compared with SF-36v2 bodily pain, CAT fatigue was compared with SF-36v2 vitality, CAT anxiety and depression were compared with SF-36v2 mental health, CAT ability to participate in social roles and activities was compared with SF-36v2 social functioning.
Absolute correlations.