Benson 2006.
Methods | Randomised controlled trial of fertility patients in US; abstract only | |
Participants | Patients (n = 258) who had been scheduled for ET were randomised into needle acupuncture (n = 53), laser acupuncture (n = 53), sham laser acupuncture (n = 52), relaxation treatment (n = 50) and no treatment (n = 50). For the purpose of this meta‐analysis, only the results from the needle acupuncture and no treatment groups were used. There were no details on the demographics as abstract only available |
|
Interventions | Needle acupuncture performed for 25 minutes before and after embryo transfer versus no intervention control group. There were no details on the qualifications of the acupuncturists as abstract only available | |
Outcomes | Clinical pregnancy rate | |
Assisted conception protocols | Protocol breakdown not provided | |
Notes | Emailed authors for LBR but no reply | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Abstract only; sequence generation not stated. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Abstract only; allocation concealment not stated. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | No sham needle group used, therefore blinding not possible |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | 258 participants randomized but authors did not state the number of participants that completed the study. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Did not report live birth |
Other bias | Low risk | None known |