Krieg 1999.
Methods | Randomised clinical trial using parallel group design (two intervention groups). | |
Participants | Country: Switzerland. Number of participants randomised: 248 elderly institutionalised women 62 to 98 (mean 84.5) years of age. Inclusion criteria: elderly institutionalised women. Exclusion criteria: not reported. |
|
Interventions | Participants were randomly assigned to receive: Intervention group 1: vitamin D3 (880 IU) plus calcium (1000 mg) daily (n = 124); Intervention group 2 (Control group): no treatment (n = 124); for a two‐year period. |
|
Outcomes | The primary outcomes were quantitative ultrasound parameters of bones and metabolic disturbances. | |
Stated aim of study | "To assess the effect of supplementation with vitamin D and calcium on quantitative ultrasound parameters and metabolic disturbances in elderly institutionalised women." | |
Notes | "The drugs were given by the nursing staff to avoid lack of compliance." Trial agents were provided by Novartis Pharma, Basle, Switzerland. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | The trial is described as randomised but the method of sequence generation was not specified. |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | The allocation sequence was known to the investigators who assigned participants. |
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Trial was not blinded, so that the allocation was known during the trial. Placebo was not used. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | The numbers and reasons for dropouts and withdrawals in all intervention groups were described. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Pre‐defined or clinically relevant and reasonably expected outcomes are reported on. |
Industry bias | Unclear risk | Trial agents were provided by Novartis Pharma, Basle, Switzerland. |
Other bias | Low risk | The trial appears to be free of other components that could put it at risk of bias. |