Table 1.
Genotype | Condition | Average number of stems | SE | Statistical groups |
---|---|---|---|---|
Col_0 | nAT | 4.7 | 0.152 | a |
phyB | nAT | 3 | 0.100 | b, c |
35S::PIF4 | nAT | 3.5 | 0.166 | b, d |
pif3 | nAT | 4.4 | 0.276 | a |
pif4 | nAT | 5.3 | 0.276 | a |
pif7-1 | nAT | 5.3 | 0.221 | a |
pif7-2 | nAT | 4.9 | 0.163 | a |
pif3 pif7 | nAT | 4.8 | 0.266 | a, e |
pifq | nAT | 4.7 | 0.314 | a |
Col_0 | hAT | 3.1 | 0.100 | c |
phyB | hAT | 2.1 | 0.298 | d |
35S::PIF4 | hAT | 2.1 | 0.133 | d |
pif3 | hAT | 3.7 | 0.200 | c |
pif4 | hAT | 3.7 | 0.221 | c |
pif7-1 | hAT | 4.5 | 0.339 | e |
pif7-2 | hAT | 4 | 0.314 | c |
pif3 pif7 | hAT | 4.3 | 0.213 | e |
pifq | hAT | 3.6 | 0.163 | c |
n = 10 plants per genotype were analyzed to assess differences among genotypes and between nAT and hAT using a two-way ANOVA. Post-hoc Tukey’s test identified non-significant differences between genotypes with the same letter