Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 29;24:721. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05394-w

Table 3.

Ovule defective phenotypes for the different genotypes at nAT and hAT

Genotype Growth conditions Normal Defective n % of defects p-values
Col-0 nAT 122 7 129 5.4
Col-0 hAT 102 45 147 30.6 ***
phyB nAT 78 17 95 17.9 #
phyB hAT 31 52 83 62.6 *** ###
35S::PIF4 nAT 115 22 137 16.1 ##
35S::PIF4 hAT 16 86 102 84.3 *** ###
pif4 nAT 90 8 98 8.2
pif4 hAT 55 21 76 27.6 **
pifq nAT 77 8 85 9.4
pifq hAT 37 31 68 45.6 *** #

The data per phenotype categories are detailed in Additional File 2 – Table S4. The statistical analysis of the data utilized Fisher’s Exact Test (* compared hAT vs. nAT and # compared the mutant vs. wild type). To ensure the reliability of our results, ovules from each genotype and condition were examined across three replicates. The significance levels in the results are denoted as follows: * significant temperature effect. # significant genotype effect. The p-value ranges are specified as # for p-values between 0.05 and 0.01, ** ## for p-values between < 0.01 to 0.0001, and *** ### for p-values lower than 0.0001