Skip to main content
. 2024 Jun 7;14(3):20230072. doi: 10.1098/rsfs.2023.0072

Figure 11.

(a) F0–u0 curves for different synthetic fin rays. The actuation stiffness increases (and the compliance Q decreases) for stiffer core stiffness Ec.

(a) F0–u0 curves for different synthetic fin rays. The actuation stiffness increases (and the compliance Q decreases) for stiffer core stiffness Ec . The coreless ray shows softening associated with buckling. (b) Morphing compliance, normalized by the morphing compliance of the coreless design (Ec = 0) from models and experiments.