Skip to main content
. 2024 May 9;47(8):745–757. doi: 10.1007/s40264-024-01431-7

Table 4.

Analysis of characteristics of serious vs. non-serious DRESS syndrome cases

Serious DRESS syndrome cases Non-serious DRESS syndrome cases OR (95% CI) P value
N 1055 39
Age, median (Q1–Q3) 43.00 (29.0–55.00) 38.5 (27.00–52.00) NA 0.31
Sex, female, n (%) 435 (42.36)a 22 (57.89)b 1.87 (0.93–3.86) 0.07
BMI, median (Q1–Q3) 23.88 (21.25–28.43) 24.17 (22.76–28.52) NA 0.77
Dose (PDD/DDD), median (Q1–Q3) 0.67 (0.18–1.30) 0.50 (0.21–0.67) NA 0.38
Duration of AP treatment (days), median (Q1–Q3) 22.00 (12.00–46.00) 16.00 (4.00–23.00) NA 0.10
Duration of DRESS (days), median (Q1–Q3) 11.00 (5.00–25.00) 12.50 (6.00–13.75) NA 0.57
Co-medication with anticonvulsants, n (%) 416 (39.43) 17 (43.59) 0.84 (0.42–1.71) 0.62
Co-medication with antibiotics, n (%) 55 (7.87) 0 (0) NA 0.07
Co-medication with miscellaneous, n (%) 51 (4.83) 0 (0) NA 0.25
> 2 antipsychotics, n (%) 245 (25.0) 3 (8.6) 3.56 (1.10–18.3) 0.03
Oral/LAIc 577/18 16/2 3.99 (0.41–19.16) 0.11

AP antipsychotic, BMI body mass index (kg/m2), CI confidence interval, DDD defined daily dose, DRESS drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, n number, LAI long-acting injectable, NA not applicable, OR odds ratio, PDD prescribed daily dose, Q1 first quartile, Q3 third quartile

aData available for 1027 cases

bData available for 38 cases

cAdministration route was reported otherwise or missing in 481 cases