Table 4.
CT parameters /scores | TS group (n = 17) | TF group (n = 17) | p valve |
---|---|---|---|
Initial CT | |||
Bronchiectasis (6 points) | 2 (2–5) | 5 (2.5–5) | 0.076 |
Cellular bronchiolitis (6 points) | 5 (3.5–6) | 2 (3–5.5) | 0.08 |
Cavitation diameter (3 points) | 0 (0–0) | 1 (0–1) | 0.049 |
Cavitation extension (3 points) | 0 (0–0) | 1 (0–2) | 0.041 |
Consolidation (3 points) | 1 (1–2.5) | 2 (1–2) | 0.454 |
Nodular (3 points) | 2 (1–2) | 1 (0.5–2) | 0.205 |
Total Score (24 points) | 12 (8–14) | 13 (10–16) | 0.136 |
Follow-up CT at least 18 months | |||
Bronchiectasis (6 points) | 2 (2–5) | 5 (3–5) | 0.080 |
Cellular bronchiolitis (6 points) | 5 (3–6) | 5 (4–5) | 0.831 |
Cavitation diameter (3 points) | 0 (0–0.5) | 1 (0–2) | 0.049 |
Cavitation extension (3 points) | 0 (0–0.5) | 1 (0–2.5) | 0.045 |
Consolidation (3 points) | 1 (1–2) | 2 (1.5–3) | 0.022 |
Nodular (3 points) | 1 (0–2) | 1 (0.5–2) | 0.843 |
Total score (24 points) | 11 (8–12.5) | 14 (10.5–19) | 0.013 |
Changes between two scansa | |||
Bronchiectasis (6 points) | 0 (− 1–1) | 1 (0–3) | 0.496 |
Cellular bronchiolitis (6 points) | 0 (− 1–0) | 0 (0–5) | 0.205 |
Cavitation diameter (3 points) | 0 (0–0) | 0.33 (0–1.05) | 0.059 |
Cavitation extension (3 points) | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–0) | 0.633 |
Consolidation (3 points) | 0 (− 5–0) | 0 (0–1) | 0.024 |
Nodular (3 points) | 0 (− 1–0) | 0 (− 5–1) | 0.131 |
Total score (24 points) | 0 (− 1–1) | 1 (0.5–2.5) | 0.049 |
Values are presented as median (IQR). Boldface indicates p values less than 0.05
Comparison between the two groups using Mann–Whitney U test
CT, computed tomography; TS, treatment success; TF, treatment failed
aThe score difference is score in follow-up CT minuses that in initial CT