Skip to main content
. 2024 May 6;42(8):852–861. doi: 10.1007/s11604-024-01570-y

Table 4.

The scores of the initial and the follow-up computed tomography (CT) according to treatment outcome in Mycobacterium abscessus complex lung disease

CT parameters /scores TS group (n = 17) TF group (n = 17) p valve
Initial CT
 Bronchiectasis (6 points) 2 (2–5) 5 (2.5–5) 0.076
 Cellular bronchiolitis (6 points) 5 (3.5–6) 2 (3–5.5) 0.08
 Cavitation diameter (3 points) 0 (0–0) 1 (0–1) 0.049
 Cavitation extension (3 points) 0 (0–0) 1 (0–2) 0.041
 Consolidation (3 points) 1 (1–2.5) 2 (1–2) 0.454
 Nodular (3 points) 2 (1–2) 1 (0.5–2) 0.205
 Total Score (24 points) 12 (8–14) 13 (10–16) 0.136
Follow-up CT at least 18 months
 Bronchiectasis (6 points) 2 (2–5) 5 (3–5) 0.080
 Cellular bronchiolitis (6 points) 5 (3–6) 5 (4–5) 0.831
 Cavitation diameter (3 points) 0 (0–0.5) 1 (0–2) 0.049
 Cavitation extension (3 points) 0 (0–0.5) 1 (0–2.5) 0.045
 Consolidation (3 points) 1 (1–2) 2 (1.5–3) 0.022
 Nodular (3 points) 1 (0–2) 1 (0.5–2) 0.843
 Total score (24 points) 11 (8–12.5) 14 (10.5–19) 0.013
Changes between two scansa
 Bronchiectasis (6 points) 0 (− 1–1) 1 (0–3) 0.496
 Cellular bronchiolitis (6 points) 0 (− 1–0) 0 (0–5) 0.205
 Cavitation diameter (3 points) 0 (0–0) 0.33 (0–1.05) 0.059
 Cavitation extension (3 points) 0 (0–0) 0 (0–0) 0.633
 Consolidation (3 points) 0 (− 5–0) 0 (0–1) 0.024
 Nodular (3 points) 0 (− 1–0) 0 (− 5–1) 0.131
 Total score (24 points) 0 (− 1–1) 1 (0.5–2.5) 0.049

Values are presented as median (IQR). Boldface indicates p values less than 0.05

Comparison between the two groups using Mann–Whitney U test

CT, computed tomography; TS, treatment success; TF, treatment failed

aThe score difference is score in follow-up CT minuses that in initial CT