Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jul 30.
Published in final edited form as: J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2021 Apr;51(3):675–681. doi: 10.1007/s11239-020-02221-5

Biomarkers of platelet activation and cardiovascular risk in the DAPT trial

David D Berg 1, Robert W Yeh 2, Laura Mauri 3, David A Morrow 1, Dean J Kereiakes 4, Donald E Cutlip 5, Qi Gao 6, Petr Jarolim 7, Alan D Michelson 8, Andrew L Frelinger III 8, Abby L Cange 1, Marc S Sabatine 1, Michelle L O’Donoghue 1
PMCID: PMC11287764  NIHMSID: NIHMS2011777  PMID: 32683645

Abstract

Prolonged use of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been shown to reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), but with increased bleeding. It remains unknown whether biomarkers of platelet activation may be useful for identifying patients at increased risk of MACE. The DAPT study was a randomized trial of 12 versus 30 months of DAPT in patients who underwent PCI. Serum biomarkers [myeloid-related protein (MRP)-8/14, P-selectin, soluble CD-40 ligand (sCD40L)] were assessed in 1399 patients early post-PCI. On-treatment platelet reactivity index (PRI) using VASP phosphorylation was assessed in 443 patients randomized to continued DAPT at 1 year. MACE was defined as CV death, MI, or ischemic stroke. Multivariable models were adjusted for baseline characteristics, index event, and stent type. A stepwise increase in the risk of MACE was observed with increasing tertiles of both MRP-8/14 and P-selectin (p-trend = 0.04 for both). After multivariable adjustment, the adjusted HR (95% CI) for MACE in patients in the top tertile was 1.94 (1.14–3.30) for MRP-8/14 and 1.62 (0.99–2.64) for P-selectin. In contrast, baseline sCD40L was not associated with CV risk. Among patients randomized to continued DAPT, higher on-treatment platelet reactivity was not significantly associated with risk of MACE (p-trend = 0.32; adj-HR T3 vs. T1 1.54, 95% CI 0.20–12.18) or bleeding (P-trend = 0.17; adj-HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.05–1.21). MRP-8/14 and soluble P-selectin may be useful for identifying patients at increased risk of MACE after PCI. The utility of on-treatment platelet function testing requires further study.

Clinical Trial Registration

https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier NCT00977938.

Keywords: Platelet function testing, VASP phosphorylation, Dual antiplatelet therapy, P-selectin, MRP-8/14

Introduction

Nearly half a million inpatients undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in the United States each year [1]. Because of the risk of recurrent events and stent thrombosis, guidelines from cardiovascular professional societies recommend that patients receive dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and a P2Y12 inhibitor for at least 1 year following PCI in the setting of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) [2, 3]. In patients who complete 1 year of DAPT without suffering a cardiac ischemic or bleeding event, continued use of DAPT beyond 1 year further decreases the risk of late stent thrombosis and prevents cardiac ischemic events remote to the stented portions of the coronary artery, but increases the risk of major bleeding [4]. Given the tradeoff between attenuated cardiovascular risk and increased risk of bleeding, risk stratification is important for determining the optimal duration of DAPT following PCI [5].

Prior studies have suggested the prognostic utility of circulating serum biomarkers of platelet activation in cardiovascular risk stratification. Myeloid-related protein (MRP)-8/14, a biomarker identified through transcript profiling of activated platelets, plays a role in calcium signaling, cytoskeletal reorganization, leukocyte adhesion, and endothelial cell inflammation [6, 7]. In a cohort of apparently healthy individuals, plasma concentration of MRP-8/14 was an independent predictor of first coronary events [8]. P-selectin, an adhesion molecule stored in the alpha-granules of platelets and released into the plasma upon platelet activation [9, 10], has been associated with incident cardiovascular disease in individuals both with and without atherosclerotic risk factors [11], and with risk of recurrent arterial events in patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI) [12]. Finally, elevated soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L), which is shed from stimulated lymphocytes and actively released from stimulated platelets, has been associated with increased risk of death and recurrent MI in patients with ACS [13].

Similarly, platelet function testing to quantify pharmaco-dynamic response to antiplatelet therapy is an established tool for cardiovascular risk assessment. One method for quantifying platelet function is platelet vasodilator-associated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation. This assay quantifies phosphorylation of an intraplatelet actin regulatory protein downstream to activation of the P2Y12 ADP receptor, and thus is useful for quantifying response to P2Y12 inhibitors [14]. Patients with a reduced platelet response to clopidogrel as measured with the VASP platelet reactivity index (PRI), have been reported to have a higher incidence of cardiovascular complications, including stent thrombosis [15, 16]. Whether on-treatment platelet reactivity as measured by VASP phosphorylation can help identify patients at increased ischemic risk remains unknown.

We therefore designed a nested, prospective biomarker substudy among patients enrolled in the DAPT study to evaluate the prognostic association of circulating biomarkers of platelet activation and platelet function testing as measured by VASP phosphorylation.

Methods

Study population and design

The DAPT study was a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial designed to test the efficacy and safety of continued thienopyridine therapy (clopidogrel or prasugrel) beyond 1 year in patients taking aspirin and a thienopyridine during the first year following coronary stenting. By design, patients could enter the study de novo or through one of four post-marketing surveillance studies. Patients entering the study de novo were enrolled within 72 h of stent placement and received open-label aspirin plus thienopyridine for the first 12 months after stent implantation. At 12 months, eligible patients from either the de novo cohort or one of the post-marketing surveillance studies who were free from major bleeding and ischemic events and adherent to therapy were randomized to continued thienopyridine vs. placebo (in addition to aspirin) for an additional 18 months. After completing the randomized treatment period (i.e., 30 months post-PCI), patients were followed for an additional 3 months (i.e., 33 months post-PCI) during which they took aspirin alone.

Biomarkers and platelet function testing

Site participation in the prospective nested biomarker and platelet function substudies was voluntary and offered to all participating centers in the United States (US). Sixty sites agreed to participate and received ethics approval through an ancillary protocol. Baseline blood samples were collected for protein biomarker assessment following enrollment and shortly before or after stent placement, and serum was stored at − 20 °C or colder until shipped to the central laboratory on dry ice, where it was stored at − 70 °C or colder until thawed for analysis at the TIMI Clinical Trials Laboratory (Boston, MA). MRP-8/14 (Buhlmann Labs, Amherst, NH), P-selectin (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) and sCD40L concentrations (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) were measured in serum with enzyme-linked immunoassays.

On-treatment platelet reactivity was assessed using VASP phosphorylation [14]. Citrated whole blood was shipped overnight to a central laboratory (Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA), and VASP PRI was measured using a quantitative flow cytometry assay (BioCytex, France) [14]. Higher values indicate greater P2Y12 receptor activation with the agonist adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and thus weaker thienopyridine-mediated P2Y12 receptor inhibition. The VASP analyses were restricted to samples obtained at the time of the randomization visit (~ 12 months after PCI), because the timing of the baseline blood draw (trial enrollment) was not standardized relative to the timing of thienopyridine administration, and this information was not captured in the case record form. The VASP analyses were further restricted to patients allocated to continue DAPT since the on-treatment platelet reactivity may not be relevant for patients stopping thienopyridine therapy.

Clinical outcomes

The primary outcome of interest for this analysis was the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke. Bleeding events were classified using the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) definitions [17]. An independent clinical events committee, blinded to study assignment, adjudicated all reported outcomes for this analysis according to prespecified criteria.

Statistical analysis

Cumulative MACE event rates from trial enrollment (i.e., immediately post-PCI) through 30 months (i.e., end of randomized treatment period) were calculated for tertiles of each biomarker of platelet activation using the Kaplan–Meier method. Adjusted estimates of the association between baseline levels of each biomarker and MACE were calculated using multivariable Cox regression with the biomarker modeled as an independent variable along with age, sex, race, body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus, current smoking, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, peripheral artery disease, prior MI, MI (STEMI or NSTEMI) at presentation, and stent type (paclitaxel, non-paclitaxel DES or bare metal stent). Platelet function analyses (VASP) examined cumulative MACE event rates from randomization (i.e., 12 months post-PCI) through 30 months by PRI tertile for patients randomized to continued DAPT. Adjusted estimates of the association between baseline PRI levels and MACE were calculated using multivariable Cox models with the same covariates as the serum biomarkers.

Results

Patient characteristics

Baseline characteristics of patients in the circulating serum biomarkers of platelet activation (n = 1399) and platelet function testing cohorts (n = 443) are summarized in Table 1. Baseline characteristics stratified by tertiles of MRP-8/14, P-selectin, sCD40L, and PRI are shown in Supplemental Tables 1, 2, 3 and 4 and for the full DAPT cohort in Supplemental Table 5. Increasing concentrations of MRP-8/14, P-selectin, and sCD40L were each associated with younger age and current smoking (Supplemental Tables 1, 2, 3). Higher on-treatment month 12 PRI was associated with non-white race, diabetes mellitus, and higher BMI (Supplemental Table 4).

Table 1.

Aggregate baseline characteristics of patients in the (1) protein biomarkers of platelet activation (n = 1399) and (2) platelet function testing (n = 443) cohorts

Variable Protein biomarkers cohort (n = 1399) Platelet function testing cohort (n=443)
Age (years), median (IQR) 63 (55, 69) 63 (56, 70)
Female 27.1% (379) 22.6% (100)
White race 95.1% (1330) 93.9% (416)
BMI, median (IQR) 30.1 (27.0, 33.7) 29.7 (26.8, 33.2)
Diabetes mellitus 30.4% (425) 28.5% (126)
Hypertension 74.0% (1033) 69.3% (307)
Current cigarette smoker or within past year 26.0% (362) 23.4% (103)
Prior stroke/TIA 4.4% (61) 4.3% (19)
Heart failure 4.3% (60) 3.6% (16)
Peripheral arterial disease 6.5% (90) 4.5% (20)
Previous percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) 32.9% (457) 28.6% (126)
Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) 13.7% (191) 12.0% (53)
Previous myocardial infarction (MI) 21.4% (292) 19.2% (84)
Indication for index procedure
 STEMI 11.7% (163) 11.3% (50)
 NSTEMI 16.0% (224) 15.3% (68)
 Unstable angina 14.9% (209) 13.3% (59)
 Stable angina 35.4% (495) 36.3% (161)
 Other 22.0% (308) 23.7% (105)
Type of stent at index procedure
 DES only 86.2% (1206) 85.6% (379)
 BMS only 13.8% (193) 14.4% (64)

BMI body-mass index, BMS bare metal stent, DES drug-eluting stent, IQR interquartile range, NSTEMI non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, STEMI ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, TIA transient ischemic attack

Biomarkers of platelet activation and cardiovascular outcomes

A stepwise increase in the risk of MACE was observed by increasing tertile of MRP-8/14 (p-trend = 0.04, Fig. 1). After adjusting for baseline differences, MRP-8/14 concentration in the top tertile was associated with an increased risk of MACE through long-term follow-up [adjusted hazard ratio (adj-HR) for top (T3) vs. bottom (T1) tertile 1.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.14–3.30]. Likewise, there was a significant increase in risk of MACE per SD of increasing MRP-8/14 concentration (adj-HR per SD 1.27, 95% CI 1.05–1.55).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Serum biomarkers of platelet reactivity at baseline and risk of the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke through long-term follow-up. Kaplan–Meier event rates are reported through 30 months (i.e., 18 months post-randomization). KM Kaplan–Meier, MRP myeloid-related protein, sCD40L soluble CD40 ligand, T tertile

Similarly, an increase in the risk of MACE was observed by increasing tertile of P-selectin (p-trend = 0.04, Fig. 1). After multivariable adjustment, the adj-HR for MACE was 1.62 (95% CI 0.99–2.64) for T3 vs. T1. For each SD increase in P-selectin concentration, the adj-HR for MACE was 1.19 (95% CI 0.96–1.48). Levels of sCD40L were not associated with risk of MACE (p-trend = 0.94; adj-HR for T3 vs. T1 1.09, 95% CI 0.66–1.80; adj-HR per SD 0.99, 95% CI 0.82–1.20, Fig. 1).

Among patients randomized to continued DAPT, the event rates for MACE per increasing tertile of month 12 VASP PRI were 2.10%, 3.45%, 4.27% (p-trend = 0.32) and for bleeding (BARC 2, 3 or 5) were 6.29%, 5.48%, 2.86% (p-trend = 0.17, Fig. 2). After multivariable adjustment, the adj-HR for MACE was 1.54 (95% CI 0.20–12.18) for T3 vs. T1, and the adj-HR for bleeding was 0.25 (95% CI 0.05–1.21) for T3 vs. T1 for patients with higher on-treatment platelet reactivity at randomization.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Platelet reactivity index (PRI) at 12 months post-PCI and risk of a the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke and b BARC 2, 3, or 5 bleeding through long-term follow-up in patients randomized to continued DAPT. Kaplan–Meier event rates are reported at 18 months post-randomization. BARC Bleeding Academic Research Consortium, DAPT dual antiplatelet therapy, KM Kaplan–Meier, PRI platelet reactivity index

Discussion

In this nested, prospective biomarker substudy of the DAPT trial, we demonstrated that higher concentrations of MRP-8/14 and P-selectin were associated with increased risk of MACE in patients undergoing coronary stenting. Our data suggest that these biomarkers of platelet activation may be useful for identifying patients at increased risk of cardiovascular events after PCI.

Optimizing risk stratification in patients undergoing coronary stenting

Although mortality in patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes has declined substantially over the last several decades, patients undergoing coronary stenting remain at increased risk for cardiovascular events. The improvement in outcomes has been related in large part to the expansion of medical therapies (e.g., lipid-lowering therapies, antithrombotic therapies, glucose-lowering therapies, etc.) used to treat patients with coronary heart disease. However, since these therapies may have counter-balancing risks, risk stratification is important for identifying patients at sufficiently high risk to justify their use.

The results of our analysis provide a validation of the prognostic association of MRP-8/14 and P-selectin as emerging biomarkers for identifying increased cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing coronary stenting in this well characterized clinical trial population. Although the current study did not suggest that sCD40L is a useful prognostic marker in this study population, this may in part reflect the pre-analytical issues that have been observed with the assay [18], including use of serum as opposed to plasma samples. Unfortunately, the current study was underpowered to directly examine the question of whether these markers may be useful for identifying patients who should continue longer duration of DAPT after PCI. Nevertheless, these biomarkers did identify patients at increased risk of MACE who may therefore benefit from more aggressive medical management. Although the association between on-treatment VASP PRI and CV risk was not statistically significant, a directional trend was observed, thereby supporting prior studies that have shown an association with CV risk [15, 16]. To that end, there continues to be interest in whether platelet function testing and genotyping may be useful for helping to guide decisions about choices and duration of antiplatelet therapy.

Limitations

The platelet function and biomarker substudies were not a mandatory part of the study protocol and therefore site participation was limited. The current analysis is therefore relatively underpowered to detect smaller risk associations and could not examine treatment interactions. These questions should therefore be prospectively addressed in future studies. Furthermore, since the DAPT trial excluded patients who had an ischemic or bleeding event during the first 12 months post-PCI, patients in the VASP analysis cohort (all of whom were randomized at 12 months) may have been less likely to experience ischemic or bleeding events during follow-up as compared with a cohort of all post-PCI patients. This may have limited the power to detect associations between PRI and clinical events in this study. In addition, an analysis of platelet function and outcomes was not conducted with samples from the time of enrollment, since the timing of thienopyridine administration in relation to sample collection was not recorded. Nonetheless, these data provide insights into the prognostic utility of the selected biomarkers of platelet activation in patients undergoing coronary stenting and may be considered in future risk stratification algorithms. Additional methods for assessing platelet function testing were not compared, and sample shipping may have affected quality due to platelet activation during handling. Finally, there was no adjustment for multiple hypothesis testing in this analysis; therefore, these data should be considered exploratory and require confirmation.

Conclusions

Soluble MRP-8/14 and P-selectin, two biomarkers of platelet function, were associated with MACE in patients undergoing coronary stenting. In addition to providing pathobiological insights into residual cardiovascular risk in this patient population, these data suggest that these biomarkers may be useful for identifying patients at increased risk of cardiovascular events after PCI. Further research is needed to investigate the utility of on-treatment platelet reactivity testing for identifying patients who may benefit from more prolonged DAPT duration.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Highlights.

  • The DAPT study enrolled patients at time of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and randomized them at 12 months to continued dual antiplatelet therapy versus aspirin monotherapy. Markers of platelet activation were measured in a subset of participants.

  • The biomarkers of platelet activation, MRP-8/14 and soluble P-selectin, were associated with a higher risk of MACE when measured after PCI.

  • Higher on-treatment platelet reactivity using VASP phosphorylation suggested that higher platelet reactivity was not significantly associated with a higher risk of MACE in this patient cohort but requires further analysis in a larger patient cohort.

  • These findings suggest that markers of platelet activation help to indicate patients at higher risk of MACE after PCI.

  • Future directions should include whether similar markers may be useful for helping to identify patients who benefit from more prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy.

Funding

Dr. Berg is supported by a T32 postdoctoral training grant from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (T32 HL007604). Dr. Sabatine and Dr. O’Donoghue were supported by grant R01HL098082 from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute for this investigation.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Berg has nothing to disclose. Dr. Yeh has received Consulting Fees and Research Grants from Abbott Vascular, AstraZeneca, Boston Scientific and Medtronic. Laura Mauri is currently a Full-Time Employee of Medtronic. Dr. Morrow has received Grants and Personal Fees from Abbott Laboratories, AstraZeneca, Roche Diagnostics, and Bayer Pharma; Grants from Novartis, BRAHMS, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Takeda, Pfizer, Quark, The Medicines Company, Merck, and Zora Diagnostics; Personal Fees from InCarda, Aralez, Peloton, and Verseon. He is a Member of the TIMI Study Group, for which he has received Institutional Research Grant support through Brigham and Women’s Hospital from Abbott, Amgen, Aralez, AstraZeneca, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., BRAHMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Intarcia, Janssen, MedImmune, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Poxel, Quark Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Takeda, The Medicines Company, and Zora Biosciences. Dr. Cutlip has received Consulting Fees from Celonova. Ms. Gao has nothing to disclose. Dr. Jarolim has received Research Grants through his institution from Abbott Laboratories, Amgen, Inc., AstraZeneca, LP, Daiichi-Sankyo, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, Merck and Co, Inc., Roche Diagnostics Corporation, Takeda Global Research and Development Center, and Waters Technologies Corporation; and Consulting Fees from Roche Diagnostics Corporation. Dr. Michelson has received Research Grants from Ironwood Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Frelinger has received Research Grants from Ironwood Pharmaceuticals. Dr. Cange has nothing to disclose. Dr. Sabatine reports Grants from AstraZeneca during the conduct of the study; Grants and Personal Fees from Amgen, Personal Fees from Anthos Therapeutics, Grants and Personal Fees from AstraZeneca, Grants from Bayer, Personal Fees from Bristol-Myers Squibb, Personal Fees from CVS Caremark, Grants from Daiichi-Sankyo, Personal Fees from DalCor, Personal Fees from Dyrnamix, Grants from Eisai, Personal Fees from Esperion, Grants from GlaxoSmithKline, Personal Fees from IFM Therapeutics, Grants and Personal Fees from Intarcia, Personal Fees from Ionis, Grants and Personal Fees from Janssen Research and Development, Grants and Personal Fees from Medicines Company, Grants and Personal Fees from MedImmune, Grants and Personal Fees from Merck, Grants and Personal Fees from Novartis, Grants from Pfizer, Grants from Poxel, Grants from Quark Pharmaceuticals, Grants from Takeda, outside the submitted work; and is a Member of the TIMI Study Group, which has also received Institutional Research Grant support through Brigham and Women’s Hospital from: Abbott, Aralez, Roche, and Zora Biosciences. Dr. O’Donoghue has received Research Grants from GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, The Medicines Company, and Merck.

Footnotes

Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-020-02221-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Ethical approval Ethics approval was obtained for all participating institutions.

Informed consent Informed consent was obtained for all participants. Patients were informed of intent to publish study results.

Data availability

Data requests can be made to Baim Research Institute. Code availability Data requests can be made to Baim Research Institute.

References

  • 1.Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, Chamberlain AM, Chang AR, Cheng S, Das SR, Delling FN, Djousse L, Elkind MSV, Ferguson JF, Fornage M, Jordan LC, Khan SS, Kissela BM, Knutson KL, Kwan TW, Lackland DT, Lewis TT, Lichtman JH, Longenecker CT, Loop MS, Lutsey PL, Martin SS, Matsushita K, Moran AE, Mussolino ME, O’Flaherty M, Pandey A, Perak AM, Rosamond WD, Roth GA, Sampson UKA, Satou GM, Schroeder EB, Shah SH, Spartano NL, Stokes A, Tirschwell DL, Tsao CW, Turakhia MP, VanWagner LB, Wilkins JT, Wong SS, Virani SS, American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology, Prevention Statistics Committee, Stroke Statistics Subcommittee (2019) Heart disease and stroke statistics—2019 update: a Report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 139(10):e56–e528. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000659 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, Casey DE Jr, Ganiats TG, Holmes DR Jr, Jaffe AS, Jneid H, Kelly RF, Kontos MC, Levine GN, Liebson PR, Mukherjee D, Peterson ED, Sabatine MS, Smalling RW, Zieman SJ, AATF Members (2014) 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 130(25):e344–e426. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, Chambers CE, Ellis SG, Guyton RA, Hollenberg SM, Khot UN, Lange RA, Mauri L, Mehran R, Moussa ID, Mukherjee D, Ting HH, O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, Brindis RG, Casey DE Jr, Chung MK, de Lemos JA, Diercks DB, Fang JC, Franklin BA, Granger CB, Krumholz HM, Linderbaum JA, Morrow DA, Newby LK, Ornato JP, Ou N, Radford MJ, Tamis-Holland JE, Tommaso CL, Tracy CM, Woo YJ, Zhao DX (2016) 2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI focused update on primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: an update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation 133(11):1135–1147. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mauri L, Kereiakes DJ, Yeh RW, Driscoll-Shempp P, Cutlip DE, Steg PG, Normand SL, Braunwald E, Wiviott SD, Cohen DJ, Holmes DR Jr, Krucoff MW, Hermiller J, Dauerman HL, Simon DI, Kandzari DE, Garratt KN, Lee DP, Pow TK, Ver Lee P, Rinaldi MJ, Massaro JM, DS Investigators (2014) Twelve or 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stents. N Engl J Med 371(23):2155–2166. 10.1056/NEJMoa1409312 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yeh RW, Secemsky EA, Kereiakes DJ, Normand SL, Gershlick AH, Cohen DJ, Spertus JA, Steg PG, Cutlip DE, Rinaldi MJ, Camenzind E, Wijns W, Apruzzese PK, Song Y, Massaro JM, Mauri L, DS Investigators (2016) Development and validation of a prediction rule for benefit and harm of dual antiplatelet therapy beyond 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA 315(16):1735–1749. 10.1001/jama.2016.3775 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Viemann D, Strey A, Janning A, Jurk K, Klimmek K, Vogl T, Hirono K, Ichida F, Foell D, Kehrel B, Gerke V, Sorg C, Roth J (2005) Myeloid-related proteins 8 and 14 induce a specific inflammatory response in human microvascular endothelial cells. Blood 105(7):2955–2962. 10.1182/blood-2004-07-2520 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Vogl T, Ludwig S, Goebeler M, Strey A, Thorey IS, Reichelt R, Foell D, Gerke V, Manitz MP, Nacken W, Werner S, Sorg C, Roth J (2004) MRP8 and MRP14 control microtubule reorganization during transendothelial migration of phagocytes. Blood 104(13):4260–4268. 10.1182/blood-2004-02-0446 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Healy AM, Pickard MD, Pradhan AD, Wang Y, Chen Z, Croce K, Sakuma M, Shi C, Zago AC, Garasic J, Damokosh AI, Dowie TL, Poisson L, Lillie J, Libby P, Ridker PM, Simon DI (2006) Platelet expression profiling and clinical validation of myeloid-related protein-14 as a novel determinant of cardiovascular events. Circulation 113(19):2278–2284 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Michelson AD, Barnard MR, Hechtman HB, MacGregor H, Connolly RJ, Loscalzo J, Valeri CR (1996) In vivo tracking of platelets: circulating degranulated platelets rapidly lose surface P-selectin but continue to circulate and function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93(21):11877–11882. 10.1073/pnas.93.21.11877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Fijnheer R, Frijns CJ, Korteweg J, Rommes H, Peters JH, Sixma JJ, Nieuwenhuis HK (1997) The origin of P-selectin as a circulating plasma protein. Thromb Haemost 77(6):1081–1085 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ridker PM, Buring JE, Rifai N (2001) Soluble P-selectin and the risk of future cardiovascular events. Circulation 103(4):491–495. 10.1161/01.cir.103.4.491 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Blann AD, Faragher EB, McCollum CN (1997) Increased soluble P-selectin following myocardial infarction: a new marker for the progression of atherosclerosis. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 8(7):383–390 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Heeschen C, Dimmeler S, Hamm CW, van den Brand MJ, Boersma E, Zeiher AM, Simoons ML, CS Investigators (2003) Soluble CD40 ligand in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 348(12):1104–1111. 10.1056/NEJMoa022600 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Schwarz UR, Geiger J, Walter U, Eigenthaler M (1999) Flow cytometry analysis of intracellular VASP phosphorylation for the assessment of activating and inhibitory signal transduction pathways in human platelets—definition and detection of ticlopidine/clopidogrel effects. Thromb Haemost 82(3):1145–1152 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Frere C, Cuisset T, Quilici J, Camoin L, Carvajal J, Morange PE, Lambert M, Juhan-Vague I, Bonnet JL, Alessi MC (2007) ADP-induced platelet aggregation and platelet reactivity index VASP are good predictive markers for clinical outcomes in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Thromb Haemost 98(4):838–843 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Cuisset T, Frere C, Quilici J, Morange PE, Nait-Saidi L, Carvajal J, Lehmann A, Lambert M, Bonnet JL, Alessi MC (2006) Benefit of a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel on platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome undergoing coronary stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 48(7):1339–1345. 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.06.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mehran R, Rao SV, Bhatt DL, Gibson CM, Caixeta A, Eikel-boom J, Kaul S, Wiviott SD, Menon V, Nikolsky E, Serebruany V, Valgimigli M, Vranckx P, Taggart D, Sabik JF, Cutlip DE, Krucoff MW, Ohman EM, Steg PG, White H (2011) Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials: a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium. Circulation 123(23):2736–2747. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.009449 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Olenchock BA, Wiviott SD, Murphy SA, Cannon CP, Rifai N, Braunwald E, Morrow DA (2008) Lack of association between soluble CD40L and risk in a large cohort of patients with acute coronary syndrome in OPUS TIMI-16. J Thromb Thrombolysis 26(2):79–84. 10.1007/s11239-007-0156-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material

Data Availability Statement

Data requests can be made to Baim Research Institute. Code availability Data requests can be made to Baim Research Institute.

RESOURCES