Table 5.
Follow-up visits and retesting among SV survivors eligible for PEP and initiating PEP, by area and period (n = 104).
| Rural (N = 67) |
Urban (n = 37) |
Total (n = 104) |
|||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre (n = 17) |
Post (n = 50) |
Total (n = 67) |
Pre (n = 20) |
Post (n = 17) |
Total (n = 37) |
Pre (n = 37) |
Post (n = 67) |
Total (n = 104) |
|
| SV survivors who initiated PEP and completed the 1-month follow-up visit (11 missing for rural; 3 missing for urban) | 5 (16%) | 27 (84%) | 32 | 2 (29%) | 5 (71%) | 7 | 7 (18%) | 32 (82%) | 39 |
| SV survivors who initiated PEP and retested at 1-month follow-up visit (proportion of those with visit done) | 4 (80%) | 26 (96%) | 30 (94%) | 1 (50%) | 5 (100%) | 6 (86%) | 5 (29%) | 31 (97%) | 36 (92%) |
| SV survivors who initiated PEP and completed the 3-month follow-up visit (14 missing rural; 1 missing urban) | 3 (10%) | 26 (90%) | 29 | 0 | 2 (100%) | 2 | 3 (10%) | 28 (90%) | 31 |
| SV survivors who initiated PEP and retested at 3-month follow-up visit (proportion of those with visit done) | 3 (100%) | 26 (100%) | 29 (100%) | 0 | 2 (100%) | 2 (100%) | 3 (100%) | 28 (100%) | 31 (100%) |
| SV survivors who initiated PEP and completed the 6-month follow-up visit (18 missing rural; 3 missing urban) | 2 (9%) | 20 (91%) | 22 | 0 | 1 (100%) | 1 | 2 (9%) | 21 (91%) | 23 |
| SV survivors who initiated PEP and retested at 6-month follow-up visit (proportion of those with visit done) | 2 (100%) | 20 (100%) | 22 (100%) | 0 | 1 (100%) | 1 (100%) | 2 (100%) | 21 (100%) | 23 (100%) |