Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 11;15:1276410. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1276410

Table 1.

Characteristics of systematic review and meta-analysis studies that are included in the umbrella review.

Reference Review type Characteristics of Included primary Number of included studies/ participants Outcomes Main results
Health Quality Ontario (39) Systematic review Published before Feb 2016 and in English, Utilised GeneSight-guided medication 4/
13,375
Response rate, remission rate, depression score, therapeutic decisions, patients' and clinicians' satisfaction Improvements in response rate, measures of depression, and patients' and clinicians' satisfaction. No differences in remission rates.
Bousman et al., (21) Meta-analysis Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), adult participants (aged ≥18), Published before May 2018 and in English. 5/1737 Remission rates Significant improvement (p = 0.005) in remission rates
Brown et al., (22) Meta-analysis Utilised the GeneSight Psychotropic test, Open-label
and RCTs, including patients ≥18 years of age diagnosed with MDD
4/1556 Symptom improvement, Response rate and Remission rate Significant increase in symptom improvements, remission and response rates
Ielmini et al., (40) Systematic review and meta-analysis RCTs, observational studies, or case-control studies, including patients aged ≥ 16 years, Published from 2000 to March 2021 in English 6/ 3,722‬ Remission and Response rates Significant improvement of remission and response rates
Peterson et al., (41) Systematic review Published before Feb 2017 in English, Including adult patients 7/ 13,841‬ Remission rate, response rate and tolerability CNSDose-guided medications significantly improve remission and reduced intolerability. Evidences are inconclusive about intolerability in ABCB1 and GeneSight based medications
Rosenblat et al., (42) Systematic review Published before Oct 2015 written in English, including adult patients (age 18-75 years), Open-label, non-randomised, nonblinded or lacking a control group 5/ 1,155 Symptom improvement, remission and response rates - Four out of five studies reported significant improvement of depression symptom, response and remission rates
Rosenblat et al., (43) Meta-analysis Published before Dec 2017 written in English, Open-label, non-randomised
or non-blinded studies with control group
6/ 1,329 Response and remission rates Significant improvement of remission and response rates
Vilches et al., (23) Meta-analysis Analysis of three studies utilised Neuropharmagen-guided medications 3/450 Symptom improvement Significant symptom improvement and the effect size is higher patients with moderate-severe depression
Brown et al., (44) Meta-analysis Prospective, controlled trial, published in English up to July 12th, 2022, Including adult participants (aged ≥18) 13/ 4,767 Remission rate Significant (P = 0.001) remission rate
Jokic et al., (45) Systematic review Published in English before Jan 2020, randomised controlled trials, non-randomised studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, including adult patients with major depression, Multi-gene pharmacogenomic testing intervention 14/ 3,497 Change in depression score, Response rate, Remission rate, intolerability to medication and Adverse events No change in depression score, GeneSight– and NeuroIDgenetix–guided medication led to significant improvements in response and remission rates.
CNSdose-guided medications led to significant improvement in remission rates. Genecept-guided medications led to no significant improvement in remission and response rates. Inconsistent impact of Neuropharmagen-guided meditations.