Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 Jul 31;19(7):e0302119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302119

Anti-inflammatory effect of the combined treatment of LMT-28 and kaempferol in a collagen-induced arthritis mouse model

Young-Jin Jeong 1,#, Sun-Ae Park 1,#, Yeon-Hwa Park 2, Lee Kyung Kim 1, Hae-Ri Lee 1, Hee Jung Kim 1,*, Tae-Hwe Heo 1,*
Editor: Masanori A Murayama3
PMCID: PMC11290667  PMID: 39083495

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by joint inflammation and swelling. Several studies have demonstrated that RA fibroblast-like synovial cells (RA-FLS) play an important role in RA pathogenesis. Activated RA-FLS contribute to synovial inflammation by secreting inflammatory cytokines including interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor-α. LMT-28 is derivative of oxazolidone and exerts anti-inflammatory effects on RA via IL-6 signaling pathway regulation. LMT-28 also regulates T cell differentiation in RA condition. However, the effect of LMT-28 on the migration and invasion of RA-FLS remains unknown. Kaempferol has been reported to have pharmacological effects on various diseases, such as inflammatory diseases, autoimmune diseases, and cancer. Additionally, kaempferol has been reported to inhibit RA-FLS migration and invasion, but it is not known about the therapeutic mechanism including molecular mechanism such as receptor. The present study aimed to investigate the synergistic effects of the combined treatment of LMT-28 and kaempferol on RA-FLS activation and RA pathogenesis in mouse model. LMT-28 and kaempferol co-administration inhibited RA disease severity and histological collapse in the joint tissues of CIA mice, as well as downregulated the levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in mouse serum. Additionally, the combined treatment inhibited excessive differentiation of T helper 17 cells and osteoclasts. Furthermore, compared with single treatments, combined treatment showed enhanced inhibitory effects on the hyperactivation of IL-6-induced signaling pathway in RA-FLS. Combined treatment also inhibited RA-FLS cell proliferation, migration, and invasion and suppressed the expression of matrix metalloproteinase in RA-FLS. Furthermore, we confirmed that the combined treatment inhibited chondrocyte proliferation, migration, and invasion. In conclusion, our results suggest that the combined treatment of LMT-28 and kaempferol exerts a synergistic effect on the RA development via the regulation of IL-6-induced hyperactivation of RA-FLS. Furthermore, this study suggests that combination therapies can be an effective therapeutic option for arthritis.

Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease accompanied by synovial tissue destruction and dysfunction [1]. The development of arthritis is induced by various factors including genetics, environment, and lifestyle [2]. The common clinical symptoms of RA include extra-articular synovitis, joint and tendon inflammation, malaise, fatigue, and fever [3]. Synovitis, characterized by immune cells infiltration into the synovial membrane, is a hallmark of RA [4]. Pathogenic T lymphocytes cause synovial inflammation by secreting pro-inflammatory cytokines [5]. A subset of CD4+ effector cells, termed T helper 17 (Th17) cells, secrete interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-17A in inflamed tissue [6]. IL-6 and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β induce the expression of retinoid-related orphan receptor gamma T (ROR-γt), a key transcription factor for Th17 cell differentiation [7]. Additionally, IL-6 upregulates the expression of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) in synovium [8]. The binding of RANKL and RANK activates the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), AKT, and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways [9] and enhances the expression of osteoclast-related transcription factors c-Fos and nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFATc1) [10]. RANKL-induced differentiation of osteoclast precursor cells leads to bone resorption and degeneration in joint tissue [11].

The activation of RA-fibroblast-like synovial cells (RA-FLS) plays an important role in RA pathogenesis and synovial inflammation [12]. Activated RA-FLS induces the secretion of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) that degrade the extracellular matrix [13]. Overproduction of MMPs causes RA-FLS to migrate and invade joint tissue and destroy the cartilage and bone in patients with RA [14]. Previous studies have shown that MMP levels are increased in the synovial tissue of patients with RA [15], and MMP-3 and MMP-9 significantly contribute to RA-FLS activation [16]. Activated RA-FLS also secrete immunomodulatory factors, including inflammatory cytokines, which participate in RA pathogenesis by inducing and maintaining synovial inflammation [17].

Inflammatory cytokines are key players in the initiation and progression of RA [18]. The levels of IL-1β, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α elevated in the serum and synovial fluid of patients with RA [19]. IL-6 is a representative pro-inflammatory cytokine that induces RA-FLS activation and causes chronic inflammation in joint tissues [20]. Inflammatory and degenerative arthritis is characterized by excessive activation of IL-6 trans-signaling [21]. Additionally, the concentrations of IL-6 and soluble IL-6 receptor (sIL-6R) are increased in RA patients, which is associated with disease severity in RA [22]. The IL-6/IL-6R complex induces glycoprotein 130 (gp130) dimerization, promoting the activation of the downstream signaling pathways Janus kinase (JAK) and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) [23]. IL-6/IL-6R/gp130 complex-induced activation of the JAK/STAT signaling pathway plays an important role in cell differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis and regulates various immune functions during RA [24]. STAT signaling pathway plays a critical role in the differentiation of CD4+ effector T cells and the expression of the ROR-γt transcriptional factor of Th17 cells [25]. Additionally, the phosphorylation of STAT3 inhibits RA-FLS apoptosis and induces the proliferation, survival, migration, and invasion of RA-FLS [26]. IL-6-induced activation of MAPK signaling pathway is also involved in RA-FLS mobility and MMP expression [27]. Based on the biological activities of IL-6 in RA development, therapies that directly target IL-6 or signaling pathways are widely used as treatment strategies for RA [28, 29]. A previous study demonstrated that the inhibition of the ERK and p38 MAPK signaling pathways can suppress the migration and invasion of RA-FLS [30].

Kaempferol, used as a combination partner of LMT-28 in this study, is a type of flavonoid and is reported to have anti-inflammatory and anticancer effects in various immune diseases [31]. Additionally, kaempferol inhibited the migration and invasion activity of RA-FLS by inhibiting the activation of the MAPK pathway [32]. In our previous study, we demonstrated that LMT-28 exerts a therapeutic effect on RA development by inhibiting the IL-6-induced signaling pathways [33]; however, it remains unclear whether LMT-28 has a regulatory effect on RA-FLS migration and invasion. Based on previous research, this study designed the combined administration of LMT-28 and kaempferol to confirm further improved preventive effects of combination on the hyperactivation of RA-FLS and RA development by simultaneously targeting the JAK/STAT pathway and MAPK pathway, which are major signaling pathways that play an important role in arthritis development. Our results demonstrated that combining LMT-28 with kaempferol can effectively alleviate arthritis symptoms in mice by downregulating the RA-FLS activation.

Materials and methods

Cell culture

The human RA-FLS cell line, MH7A, was provided by Prof. Yong Yeon Cho (The Catholic University of Korea, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea). Human chondrocyte cell line, C28/I2 cell, was purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). MH7A cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Welgene, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Republic of Korea) and C28/I2 cells were cultured Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (Corning, NY, USA), respectively, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Corning) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and incubated at 37°C in 5% humidified CO2 incubator.

Animals

Six-week-old male DBA/1J and C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Orient Bio (Gyeonggi-do, South Korea). The animal experiments were conducted in accordance with internationally accepted standards and protocols and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of the Catholic University of Korea, Songsim campus (Bucheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea) (approval number: 2016-018-02).

There is no experimental method in this experiment that causes extreme stress or pain, but joint pain and discomfort may occur due to arthritis development. Therefore, the condition of the experimental animals was monitored in real time, and to alleviate the pain of the experimental animals, euthanasia was performed when the mouse arthritis score first reached 4 points. At the end-time, mice were placed in euthanasia chamber and filled with CO2 at a rate of 10–30% per minute to euthanasia and checked for loss of consciousness, breathing, and cardiac arrest in the mice after euthanasia.

Collagen-induced arthritis model and evaluation of arthritis score

To evaluate the synergistic effects of LMT-28 and kaempferol on RA-FLS activation and RA pathogenesis, a collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) mouse model was established as described below. To provide the first immunization, 50 μg bovine type II collagen (Chondrex, Woodinville, WA, USA) and complete Freund’s adjuvant (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) were intradermally injected in DBA/1J mice through the base of the tail. After 2 weeks, mice were immunized with 50 μg bovine type II collagen and incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (Sigma-Aldrich). Following the second immunization, mice received oral administration of LMT-28 (1 mg/kg) (Sigma-Aldrich), kaempferol (10 mg/kg) (Sigma-Aldrich), a combination of LMT-28 (1 mg/kg) and kaempferol (10 mg/kg), or vehicle (10% DMSO in distilled water) (N = 10 in each group) six times per week. The severity of arthritis in the fore and hind paws was determined twice a week from day 0 to 63 after the first immunization. The arthritis score was evaluated by three blinded observers according to the Hooke Laboratories Manual, as described in Table 1.

Table 1. CIA scoring system.

Score Typical mouse paw appearance
0 Normal paw
1 One or two toes inflamed and swollen
2 More than three toes inflamed w/no paw swelling, or mild swelling of entire paw
3 Entire paw inflamed and swollen
4 Severely swollen paw and all toes, or ankylosed paw and toes

Joint tissue staining

The hind paws were dissected and decalcified in 10% formic acid (Sigma-Aldrich) for 21 days. After decalcification, specimens were dehydrated using ethanol and xylene (DUKSAN, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea) and embedded in paraffin pastilles (Merck Millipore) overnight. Paraffin blocks were sectioned into 4 μm slices, which were then dried on a glass slide overnight. The tissue sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated with xylene and ethanol. After staining with EASY STAIN Harris hematoxylin (YD Diagnostics, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea) and Eosin Y solution (MUTO PURE Chemicals, Tokyo, Japan), the tissue sections were dehydrated with ethanol and xylene again. The sections were mounted onto the slides using a mounting solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and imaged using an APERIO CS2 slide scanner (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). Histological analysis of joint tissues stained with hematoxylin and eosin was performed by Orient GENIA (Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea) according to manufacturer’s guidelines and described in Table 2.

Table 2. Histopathological analysis of joint tissues of CIA mice.

Score Histological feature Description
0 Inflammation Normal
1 Slight inflammation
2 Moderate inflammation
3 Severe inflammation
0 Synovial hyperplasia Normal
1 Slight synovial hyperplasia
2 Moderate synovial hyperplasia
3 Severe synovial hyperplasia
0 Pannus formation Normal
1 Slight pannus formation
2 Moderate pannus formation
3 Severe pannus formation
0 Erosion of cartilage and bone Normal
1 Slight erosion
2 Moderate erosion
3 Severe erosion

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

Antibodies against TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-17A (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) were diluted in 1× phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and added to Immuno 96-well plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 100 μL/well. The plates were incubated at 4°C overnight and treated with 200 μL/well of blocking buffer (1% BSA dissolved in 1× PBS) for 1 h. Subsequently, 100 μL of diluted serum or soup of MH7A culture medium and standard (0–500 pg/mL) were added to the wells. Avidin-horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (BioLegend) was added for 30 min, and TMB substrate solution (Surmodics, Eden Prairie, MN, USA) was added to each well until sufficient color development was confirmed. After stopping the reaction with 2N HCl, a microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) was used to measure the optical density at 450 nm.

Ex vivo mouse Th17 cell differentiation assay

Spleens isolated from normal DBA1/J mice were separated into single cells. Splenocytes were then incubated with 1× RBC lysis buffer (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) at room temperature for 5 min. After washing with PBS, naïve CD4+ T lymphocytes were isolated using mouse CD4 (L3T4) MicroBeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). A Th17 cell differentiation assay with mouse splenocytes was performed using a mouse Th17 differentiation kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, hamster anti-mouse CD3 antibody (BioLegend) and anti-mouse CD28 antibody (BioLegend) were added to 96-well tissue culture plates, which were incubated at 4°C overnight. The naïve CD4+ T lymphocytes isolated from the spleen were suspended in X-VIVO 15 medium added at 125 μL/well (Lonza, Switzerland), seeded into anti-mouse CD3 and CD28 antibody-coated wells, and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 overnight. Stimulated CD4+ T lymphocytes were treated with LMT-28 (25 μM) and/or kaempferol (12.5 μM), and the plates were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 3 days. All the diluted reagents in the medium were refreshed every 2 days, and 5 days after stimulation, cells were collected and washed with X-VIVO 15 medium. Cells were suspended with X-VIVO 15 media containing 1× cell stimulation cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 1× monensin (eBioscience) for stimulation and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 4 h. Subsequently, the cells were analyzed using flow cytometry.

Flow cytometry analysis

Differentiated CD4+ T cells and splenocytes isolated CIA mice were centrifuged and incubated with anti-CD4-PE-cy7 antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific) or anti-CD25-VioBright FITC antibody (Miltenyi Biotec) for 30 min at 4°C in the dark. After washing, cells were fixed/permeabilized using the Intracelluar Fixation & Permeabilization buffer set (eBioscience) at 4°C for 10 min in the dark. The cells were incubated with anti-IL-17A-PE antibody (Miltenyi Biotec) or anti-mouse FOXP3 antibody (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) diluted in 1× permeabilization buffer (eBioscience) for 30 min at 4°C in the dark. After washing, the cells were resuspended in FACS buffer and analyzed using a flow cytometer (FACS CANTO II; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).

Osteoclastogenesis assay

Mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMMs) isolated from normal C57BL/6 mice were seeded on cell culture plates in α-MEM media (Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing 20 ng/mL of macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF; R&D Systems) and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 4 days. After incubation, BMMs were treated with M-CSF (20 ng/mL), RANKL (40 ng/mL; R&D Systems), LMT-28 (25 μM) and/or kaempferol (12.5 μM) for 3 days. Media were replaced with α-MEM media containing same reagents and incubated for another 2 days. The cells were stained for analyze the tartrate-resistant acid phosphate (TRAP) activity using a TRAP single-stain kit (TAKARA Bio, Shiga, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. TRAP+ cells with three or more nuclei were considered mature osteoclasts.

Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction

Total RNA was extracted from MH7A and C28/I2 cells using TRIzol reagent. cDNA was synthesized from RNA (1 μg) using the PrimeScript RT Master Mix cDNA synthesis kit (TAKARA Bio). Quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed using TB Green Premix Ex Taq II (TAKARA Bio), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, initial denaturation was performed at 95°C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of thermal cycling at 95°C for 5 s and 60°C for 30 s. The relative mRNA levels were normalized to those of GAPDH. The primers used for RT-qPCR are listed in Table 3.

Table 3. RT-qPCR primers used in this study.

Gene Primer sequence (5′-3′) Amplicon length (bp)
Forward Reverse
c-fos GCGAGCAACTGAGAAGAC TTGAAACCCGAGAACATC 162
nfatc1 CAACGCCCTGACCACCGATAG GGCTGCCTTCCGTCTCATAGT 395
ctsk ATACGTTACTCCAGTCAAGAACCAG ATAATTCTCAGTCACACAGTCCACA 151
trap GGCTACTTGCGGTTTCACTATG GGGAGGCTGGTCTTAAAGAGTG 131
Mmp-1 CTGTTCAGGGACAGAATGTGCT TCGATATGCTTCACAGTTCTAGGG 85
Mmp-2 CCGTCGCCCATCATCAAGTT CTGTCTGGGGCAGTCCAAAG 169
Mmp-3 TATGGACCTCCCCCTGACTCC CAGGTTCAAGCTTCCTGAGG 187
Mmp-9 CGTGTCTGGAGATTCGACTTGA TTGGAAACTCACACGCCAGA 165
Mmp-13 CTGGCCTGCTGGCTCATGCTT GCAGGGTCCTTGGAGTGGTCA 166
Gapdh CGAGATCCCTCCAAAATCAA TTCACACCCATGACGAACAT 170

Western blot assay

The total lysates of MH7A cells and differentiated osteoclasts were used for western blotting. Cells were pre-treated with LMT-28 (25 μM), kaempferol (12.5 μM), or combination (LMT-28 25 μM + kaempferol 12.5 μM) for 1 h and then stimulated with 20 ng/mL hyper IL-6 (Recombinant human IL-6/IL-6R alpha protein chimera; R&D Systems) for 5 min. Cells were lysed using radioimmunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer (Biosesang, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea). Proteins extracts were loaded in and separated using SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to a MembraneImmobilon®-P transfer membrane (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA). The membranes were incubated with primary antibodies against STAT3, ERK, AKT, p-STAT3, p-ERK, p-AKT, gp130, and p-gp130 (1:1000 dilution; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), and β-actin (1:4000 dilution; Cell Signaling Technology) overnight. After incubation, the membranes were treated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:4000 dilution; Cell Signaling Technology), and protein bands were detected using SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Chemiluminescent signals were analyzed using a ChemiDoc XRS gel imaging system (BioRad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Western blot bands from three experiments were quantitated using the ImageJ software.

Proliferation assay

MH7A cells were seeded in 96-well plates containing 200 μL of RPMI medium and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 72 h. After 72 h of incubation with hyper IL-6, the cells were treated with LMT-28 (25 μM), kaempferol (12.5 μM), or combination for 24 h. The absorbance was measured using the D-Plus CCK cell viability assay kit (DONGIN LS, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea) at 450 nm.

Scrape-wound migration assays

MH7A cells were seeded in a 6-well plate at 2×105 cells/well and wounded using sterilized pipette tips. The tips were placed under UV light for 1 h prior to use. After wounding, detached cells were washed using PBS, and the cells were pre-treated with LMT-28 (25 μM), kaempferol (12.5 μM), or combination for 3 days. After incubation, images were captured at 0, 24, and 48 h, and the migration rate of the cells was calculated based on a reference statistical analysis [34] using the following formula: [(Areat = 0h−Areat = Δ h)/Areat = 0h] × 100%.

Invasion assay

MH7A cells were seeded in a BioCoat Matrigel Invasion Chamber (BD Biosciences) with 500 μL of serum-free RPMI medium containing LMT-28 and/or kaempferol. Normal RPMI medium (700 μL) was placed outside of the chamber. After 48 h of incubation, infiltrating cells were stained using a Differential Quick Stain Kit (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA). The number of invading cells was quantified using ImageJ.

Statistical analysis

To evaluate the synergistic effect of the LMT-28 and kaempferol combination, we calculated the coefficient of drug interaction (CDI) according to a reference statistical methodology [35]. CDI was calculated using the following formula:

CDI=AB/A×B

A synergistic effect is implied when the CDI < 1. Results are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Data were compared for statistical significance using Student’s t-test or one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnett multiple comparison test. P-values less than 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 were considered statistically significant.

Results

LMT-28 and kaempferol combination ameliorates synovial inflammation in CIA mice model

The CIA model was established by intradermal injection of collagen and an adjuvant into the tails of DBA1/J mice. Subsequently, mice were orally administered LMT-28 and kaempferol every 2 days for 70 days. The effect of the co-administration of LMT-28 and kaempferol on RA development was evaluated using arthritis scoring and histological analysis of CIA mice. As a result, the arthritis score in the LMT-28 and kaempferol combination group was lower than that in the single administration group (Fig 1A). The combination of LMT-28 and kaempferol effectively suppressed toe swelling and bending in mice (Fig 1B). At day 70 after first immunization, mouse paw tissues were dehydrogenated and embedded in paraffin. The paraffin-embedded slide sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin to analyze the histological features of the joint tissues of CIA mice (Fig 1C). Combined administration inhibited histopathological phenomena, such as inflammation, synovial hyperplasia, pannus formation, and erosion of cartilage and bone (Fig 1D). Additionally, we analyzed the levels of circulating pro-inflammatory cytokines in the serum of CIA mice. Compared with single treatment, co-administration of LMT-28 and kaempferol down-regulated the serum levels of IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-17A (Fig 1E). Taken together, these results showed that combined administration has a synergistic effect on RA development.

Fig 1. Co-administration effect of LMT-28 and kaempferol on collagen-induced arthritis mouse model.

Fig 1

(A) Arthritis scores of mice were measured every 3 days starting at 21 days after the first immunization. (B) DBA1/J mice showed deformation and swelling of the toe and ankle joints. (C) Paraffin-embedded sections of CIA mice joint were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. (D) Histological analysis was performed based on the analysis criteria: inflammation, synovial hyperplasia, pannus formation, and erosion of cartilage and bone. (E) The protein levels of IL-6, IL-1β and IL-17 in CIA mouse serum were measured using ELISA. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. #p<0.05 vs. normal group, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.005 vs. CIA control group.

Combined administration of LMT-28 and kaempferol regulates the T cell differentiation

Based on the anti-inflammatory effects of the LMT-28 and kaempferol combination described in the previous section, we investigated whether LMT-28 and kaempferol has a modulatory effect on T cell populations. Splenocytes isolated from CIA mice were stimulated with PMA and ionomycin, and T cell populations in each group were analyzed using flow cytometry. The population of CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T (Treg) cell subsets was upregulated in the spleens of LMT-28 or kaempferol single-treated mice compared with CIA control mice (Fig 2A), but there was no synergistic effect of LMT-28 and kaempferol on Treg differentiation. Additionally, the differentiation of CD4+IL-17A+ Th17 cells in the spleen increased in the CIA control group compared with the normal group and significantly suppressed in the groups administered LMT-28 alone or in combination with kaempferol (Fig 2B).

Fig 2. Effect of LMT-28 and kaempferol on T cell differentiation.

Fig 2

Flow cytometry dot plots (left) and percentage comparisons (right) of (A) Treg cell and (B) Th17 cell population in splenocytes of CIA mice. (C) Dot plots and percentage comparisons of Th17 cell population differentiated from sorted splenocytes. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. #p<0.05 vs. normal group or non-treated group, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.005 vs. control group.

To further demonstrate the combined effect of LMT-28 and kaempferol on Th17 cell differentiation, we performed a Th17 cell differentiation assay. The population of Th17 cell differentiated from CD3/CD28-stimulated naïve CD4+ T lymphocytes was downregulated by a single treatment with LMT-28 or kaempferol and was suppressed by co-treatment (Fig 2C). Thus, the co-administration of LMT-28 and kaempferol synergistically inhibited the differentiation of naïve CD4+ T lymphocytes into Th17 cells compared with single treatments.

Co-administration of LMT-28 and kaempferol inhibits excessive osteoclast differentiation

Excessive differentiation of osteoclasts induces abnormal regeneration of bones and destruction of synovial tissues [36]. In this study, we investigated whether the combined treatment suppresses RANKL-induced osteoclast differentiation. BMMs were stimulated with M-CSF (20 ng/mL) and RANKL (40 ng/mL) and then treated with LMT-28 (25 μM) and/or kaempferol (12.5 μM). TRAP staining result showed that osteoclast activity was downregulated to a greater extent in the LMT-28 and kaempferol combination group than in the single drug treatment groups (Fig 3A). Additionally, the combined treatment suppressed the number of differentiated osteoclasts more effectively than the single drug treatments (Fig 3B). We also analyzed the mRNA expression of the key transcription factors nfatc1 and c-fos and the downstream proteins ctsk, and trap. Co-administration of LMT-28 and kaempferol suppressed the increase in mRNA expression of osteoclast-related factors in differentiated osteoclasts (Fig 3C). These results suggested that the combination of LMT-28 and kaempferol has a synergistic inhibitory effect on RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis.

Fig 3. Combination effect of LMT-28 and kaempferol on RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis.

Fig 3

BMMs isolated from normal mice were stimulated with M-CSF (20 ng/mL) and/or RANKL (40 ng/mL) and treated with LMT-28 (25 μM) and/or kaempferol (12.5 μM). (A) Microscopic image (200× magnification) of osteoclasts stained for TRAP activity and (B) quantification of the number of TRAP+ multinucleated osteoclasts (≥3 nuclei) in each treatment group are presented. (C) The mRNA levels of c-fos, nfatc1, ctsk and trap in osteoclasts were measured. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. #p<0.05 vs. M-CSF-treated group; *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.005 vs. M-CSF- and RANKL-treated control group.

LMT-28 and kaempferol shows a suppressive effect on the hyperactivation of IL-6-induced signaling pathways in RA-FLS

To analyze the mechanism underlying the combined effect of LMT-28 and kaempferol, we evaluated how the co-treatment affects the IL-6-induced signaling pathway. The human RA-FLS cell line MH7A was pre-treated with LMT-28 (25 μM) and/or kaempferol (12.5 μM) for 1 h, and stimulated with hyper IL-6 (20 ng/mL). Densitometric analysis of gp130, STAT3, ERK, and AKT was performed using western blotting. No significant inhibitory effect on the gp130, STAT3 and ERK signaling pathways in the single treatment groups was observed; however, the combined treatment showed an enhanced inhibitory effect on hyper IL-6-induced phosphorylation of gp130, STAT3, ERK, and AKT compared to single treatment (Fig 4A and 4B). These results suggest that the combination of LMT-28 and kaempferol prevents RA onset and osteoclastogenesis via synergistic inhibition of the IL-6-induced signaling pathway in RA-FLS.

Fig 4. Effect of LMT-28 and kaempferol combination on IL-6-induced signaling in RA-FLS.

Fig 4

The human RA-FLS cell line MH7A was pre-treated with LMT-28 (25 μM) and/or kaempferol (12.5 μM) for 1 h, and stimulated with hyper IL-6 (20 ng/mL) for 5 min. Total proteins were extracted from MH7A cell homogenates and analyzed using western blotting. (A) Densitometric analysis of western blot bands and (B) expression level graphs of p-gp130, p-STAT3, p-ERK and p-AKT in MH7A cells are presented. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. #p<0.05 vs. non-treated group; *p<0.05 vs. hyper IL-6 treated group.

Combination of LMT-28 and kaempferol suppresses RA-FLS hyperactivation and MMP expression

RA-FLS play an important role in synovial inflammation and tissue destruction during RA pathogenesis, and the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 has been demonstrated to induce the hyperactivation of RA-FLS [37]. Based on the enhanced inhibitory efficacy of the co-treatment on the IL-6 signaling pathway activation in RA-FLS, we hypothesized that the combined treatment would have a synergistic negative effect on IL-6-induced hyperactivation of RA-FLS. To validate this theory, MH7A cells were stimulated with hyper IL-6 (20 ng/mL) and subsequently treated with LMT-28 (25 μM) and/or kaempferol (12.5 μM). Compared with single treatment, co-treatment with LMT-28 and kaempferol more effectively inhibited the IL-6-induced RA-FLS proliferation (Fig 5A). Additionally, we investigated the combination effect on RA-FLS migration and invasion. The combined treatment suppressed the IL-6-induced migration rate (Fig 5B) and invasive activity of MH7A cells (Fig 5C).

Fig 5. Effect of LMT-28 and kaempferol co-treatment on RA-FLS activation.

Fig 5

MH7A cells were stimulated with hyper IL-6 (20 ng/mL) and treated with LMT-28 (25 μM) and/or kaempferol (12.5 μM). (A) MH7A cell proliferation was measured using the CCK-8 assay. The migration activity of MH7A cells was evaluated by wound-healing assay. MH7A cells were scratched using a sterile 200 μL pipette tip, followed by treatment with LMT-28 and/or Kaempferol for 48 h. (B, left) Images were captured at 200× magnification, and (B, right) the migration rate of MH7A cells was measured at 0, 24 and 48 h after treatment. Matrigel invasion assay was used to determine invasion after 48 h in LMT-28 and kaempferol-treated MH7A cells. (C, left) Microscopic images (200× magnification) of Matrigel and (C, right) the number of invading cells are presented. Relative (D) mRNA expression and (E) protein levels of MMPs in MH7A cells were measured. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. #p<0.05 vs. non-treated control group; *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.005 vs. hyper IL-6 group.

Furthermore, we measured MMP level to investigate whether LMT-28 and kaempferol could prevent IL-6-induced overexpression of MMPs in RA-FLS. RT-qPCR results showed that the co-treatment of LMT-28 and kaempferol significantly suppressed the mRNA expression of Mmp-1, Mmp-2, Mmp-3, Mmp-9, and Mmp-13 in RA-FLS (Fig 5D). Additionally, the results of ELISA showed that the protein levels of MMP-1, MMP-3, and MMP-13 were downregulated by co-treatment of LMT-28 and kaempferol (Fig 5E). These results show that co-treatment with LMT-28 and kaempferol has an enhanced inhibitory effect on the IL-6-induced hyperactivation of RA-FLS.

LMT-28 and kaempferol suppresses the hyperactivation of chondrocytes

To further investigate the efficacy of LMT-28 and kaempferol co-treatment on chondrocyte activity, the human chondrocyte cell line C28/I2 was stimulated with hyper IL-6 (20 ng/mL) and then treated with LMT-28 (25 μM) and/or kaempferol (12.5 μM). Hyper IL-6 upregulated the proliferation of chondrocytes, and the combination of LMT-28 and kaempferol suppressed chondrocyte proliferation more effectively than the single treatments (Fig 6A).

Fig 6. Combined effect of LMT-28 and kaempferol on chondrocyte activation.

Fig 6

The human chondrocyte cell line C28/I2 was stimulated with hyper IL-6 (20 ng/mL) and treated with LMT-28 (25 μM) and/or kaempferol (12.5 μM). (A) C28/I2 cell proliferation was measured using CCK-8 assay. The migration activity of C28/I2 cells was evaluated by the wound-healing assay. C28/I2 cells were scratched using a sterile 200 μL pipette tip, followed by treatment with LMT-28 and/or kaempferol for 48 h. (B, left) Images were captured at 200× magnification, and (B, right) the migration rate of C28/I2 cells was measured at 0, 24 and 48 h after treatment. Matrigel invasion assay was used to determine invasion after 48 h in LMT-28 and kaempferol treated C28/I2 cells. (C, left) Microscopic images (200× magnification) of Matrigel and (C, right) the number of invading cells are presented. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. #p<0.05 vs. non-treated control group; *p<0.05, **p<0.01, and ***p<0.005 vs. hyper IL-6 group.

Excessive migration and invasion of chondrocytes play crucial role in the degenerative erosion of joints [38]. We examined whether excessive migration and invasion of chondrocytes could be suppressed by co-treatment with LMT-28 and kaempferol. The migration rate of chondrocytes increased in the IL-6-treated group and was effectively suppressed by treatment with LMT-28 and kaempferol (Fig 6B). Additionally, co-treatment neutralized the invasive activity of chondrocytes (Fig 6C). In conclusion, combination of LMT-28 and kaempferol synergistically inhibited chondrocyte hyperactivation.

Discussion

This study aimed to investigate the synergistic effects of LMT-28 and kaempferol on RA development. In our previous study, a single administration of 5 mg/kg LMT-28 suppressed RA pathology by targeting IL-6 activity in a CIA in vivo mouse model. In the present study, we attempted to determine whether a lower dose of LMT-28 co-administered with other drugs has a synergistic effect on suppressing RA development. In this study, we lowered the concentration of LMT-28 to 1 mg/kg and administered it together with kaempferol. Compared with single drug administration, the co-administration of LMT-28 and kaempferol effectively alleviated RA symptoms.

T cells are activated by the stimulation of immunomodulatory factors, following which they infiltrate synovial tissues and secrete various inflammatory cytokines during arthritis [39]. This study investigated the combined effect of LMT-28 and kaempferol on T cell differentiation using CIA mice and Th17 cell differentiation using ex vivo assay. Our results showed that combined treatment of LMT-28 and kamepferol had an enhanced inhibitory effect on Th17 cell differentiation. Uncontrolled osteolysis of the bone tissue is a typical symptom of arthritis, and osteoclasts secrete TRAP and CtsK to induce bone resorption, exacerbating RA symptoms [40]. Osteoclast formation is influenced by the network of cytokines, chemokines, and immune cells. Recent studies have used anti-RANKL antibodies such as denosumab to inhibit osteoclast formation [41]. However, anti-RANKL therapies have no anti-inflammatory effects and must be combined with other anti-inflammatory drugs. Therefore, appropriate combined treatment can be an alternative to suppress osteoclastogenesis and RA development. In this study, we demonstrated that the combined effects of LMT-28 and kaempferol on RANKL-induced excessive osteoclast differentiation. The mRNA level of nfatc1, a key transcription factor for osteoclast differentiation, was not significantly different in the groups administered LMT-28 and kaempferol alone but was significantly suppressed in the co-treatment group. Additionally, the mRNA expression levels of c-fos, ctsk and trap were down-regulated by the combined treatment. In conclusion, our results showed that the combination of LMT-28 and kaempferol synergistically inhibited excessive osteoclast differentiation and mRNA expression of osteoclast-related genes.

Previous studies have demonstrated that IL-6 overproduction increases RANKL expression in the synovial environment and induces the differentiation of osteoclast precursor cells [42]. Based on the enhanced suppressive effects of the LMT-28 and kaempferol combination on osteoclastogenesis, we hypothesized that this treatment combination may modulate the hyperactivation of IL-6 signaling pathway. To verify our hypothesis, we assessed the combination effect on the hyperactivation of IL-6-induced signaling pathways in the RA-FLS. Single treatment of LMT-28 (25 μM) or kaempferol (12.5 μM) had no significant effect on IL-6-induced signaling pathway activation, but the combined treatment significantly inhibited the phosphorylation of gp130, STAT, ERK, and AKT (Fig 4A and 4B). In a previous study, single treatment of LMT-28 did not effectively inhibit the phosphorylation of signaling molecules induced by IL-6 at concentrations below 50 μM [33], but in this study, the co-administration of 25 μM LMT-28 with kaempferol inhibited the phosphorylation of the signaling molecules. These results demonstrate the improved inhibitory effect of LMT-28 and kaempferol combination on the hyperactivation of IL-6-induced signaling pathways in RA-FLS.

RA-FLS is the main cell type involved in RA pathogenesis, inducing pannus formation and erosion of articular cartilage by invading the synovial tissue [43]. In a previous study, kaempferol inhibited the migration and invasion of RA-FLS by blocking IL-6-induced MAPK signaling pathways [44]. However, the effects of LMT-28 on the migration and invasion of RA-FLS remain unclear. Therefore, we tested the combined effect of LMT-28 and the combination with kaempferol on the IL-6-induced hyperactivation of RA-FLS. In the present study, proliferation, migration, and invasion of RA-FLS were effectively inhibited by LMT-28 treatment and the combination therapy showed an enhanced suppressive effect compared to single treatment (Fig 5A–5C). Since increased expression of MMPs is a hallmark of RA-FLS activation, we measured the mRNA and protein levels of MMPs secreted by RA-FLS. LMT-28 suppressed the mRNA and protein expression of MMP and the combined treatment with kaempferol more effectively downregulated MMP expression (Fig 5D and 5E). These results suggest that the combined administration of LMT-28 and kaempferol may alleviate RA pathology by suppressing the IL-6-induced hyperactivation of RA-FLS.

Furthermore, we investigated whether the combined treatment has an inhibitory effect on chondrocyte activation. Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic type of arthritis, whose development is induced by the excessive activation of chondrocytes [45]. Similar to RA-FLS, the migration and invasion activities of chondrocytes induce cartilage damage and loss, resulting in the development of OA [46]. Thus, we assessed the effects of the LMT-28 treatment and co-treatment on chondrocytes activation. As a result, single treatment of LMT-28 down-regulated chondrocyte proliferation, migration, and invasion and the combined treatment of LMT-28 and kaempferol showed an inhibitory enhanced effect (Fig 6A–6C). Considering that LMT-28 and kaempferol inhibit excessive chondrocyte activation, our results suggest that LMT-28 and kaempferol have the potential to suppress OA development. Further studies are needed to evaluate the suppressive effects of LMT-28 on the pathogenesis of OA. Taken together, our findings suggest that combination of LMT-28 and kaempferol synergistically regulates IL-6-induced hyperactivation of synovial cells and can be an alternative option for arthritis treatment.

Conclusions

Co-administration of LMT-28 and kaempferol inhibited arthritis symptoms by regulating of Th17 cell and osteoclast differentiation. Mechanistic studies on IL-6-induced signaling pathways in RA-FLS suggested that the combination of LMT-28 and kaempferol has a significant effect on hyperactivation of IL-6-related activities in arthritis. Additionally, the combined treatment with LMT-28 and kaempferol had a significant regulatory effect on the hyperactivation of RA-FLS and chondrocytes. The results of our study suggest that the co-administration of LMT-28 and kaempferol is a potential therapy option for arthritis.

Supporting information

S1 Raw images. Whole membrane images of western blotting analysis.

(PDF)

pone.0302119.s001.pdf (290.4KB, pdf)
S1 Raw data

(ZIP)

pone.0302119.s002.zip (90.9KB, zip)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology [grant number. 2018R1A6A1A03025108 and 2022R1A2C2009911]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Firestein GS. Evolving concepts of rheumatoid arthritis. Nature. 2003;423(6937):356–61. doi: 10.1038/nature01661 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.McInnes IB, Schett G. The pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. New England Journal of Medicine. 2011;365(23):2205–19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1004965 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Grassi W, De Angelis R, Lamanna G, Cervini C. The clinical features of rheumatoid arthritis. European journal of radiology. 1998;27:S18–S24. doi: 10.1016/s0720-048x(98)00038-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yap H-Y, Tee SZ-Y, Wong MM-T, Chow S-K, Peh S-C, Teow S-Y. Pathogenic role of immune cells in rheumatoid arthritis: implications in clinical treatment and biomarker development. Cells. 2018;7(10):161. doi: 10.3390/cells7100161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cope AP. T cells in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2008;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. Epub 20081015. doi: 10.1186/ar2412 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Leipe J, Grunke M, Dechant C, Reindl C, Kerzendorf U, Schulze-Koops H, et al. Role of Th17 cells in human autoimmune arthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 2010;62(10):2876–85. doi: 10.1002/art.27622 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Kimura A, Kishimoto T. IL-6: regulator of Treg/Th17 balance. European journal of immunology. 2010;40(7):1830–5. doi: 10.1002/eji.201040391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kotake S, Udagawa N, Takahashi N, Matsuzaki K, Itoh K, Ishiyama S, et al. IL-17 in synovial fluids from patients with rheumatoid arthritis is a potent stimulator of osteoclastogenesis. The Journal of clinical investigation. 1999;103(9):1345–52. doi: 10.1172/JCI5703 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Matsumoto M, Sudo T, Saito T, Osada H, Tsujimoto M. Involvement of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling pathway in osteoclastogenesis mediated by receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL). Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2000;275(40):31155–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Asagiri M, Takayanagi H. The molecular understanding of osteoclast differentiation. Bone. 2007;40(2):251–64. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.09.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Amarasekara DS, Kim S, Rho J. Regulation of osteoblast differentiation by cytokine networks. International journal of molecular sciences. 2021;22(6):2851. doi: 10.3390/ijms22062851 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bartok B, Firestein GS. Fibroblast-like synoviocytes: key effector cells in rheumatoid arthritis. Immunological reviews. 2010;233(1):233–55. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2009.00859.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bustamante MF, Garcia-Carbonell R, Whisenant KD, Guma M. Fibroblast-like synoviocyte metabolism in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis research & therapy. 2017;19:1–12. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1303-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mor A, Abramson SB, Pillinger MH. The fibroblast-like synovial cell in rheumatoid arthritis: a key player in inflammation and joint destruction. Clinical immunology. 2005;115(2):118–28. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2004.12.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Tchetverikov I, Ronday H, Van El B, Kiers G, Verzijl N, TeKoppele J, et al. MMP profile in paired serum and synovial fluid samples of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2004;63(7):881–3. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.013243 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tolboom T, Pieterman E, Van der Laan W, Toes R, Huidekoper A, Nelissen R, et al. Invasive properties of fibroblast-like synoviocytes: correlation with growth characteristics and expression of MMP-1, MMP-3, and MMP-10. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2002;61(11):975–80. doi: 10.1136/ard.61.11.975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.McInnes IB, Schett G. Cytokines in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7(6):429–42. doi: 10.1038/nri2094 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Feldmann M, Brennan FM, Maini RN. Role of cytokines in rheumatoid arthritis. Annual review of immunology. 1996;14(1):397–440. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.14.1.397 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Burska A, Boissinot M, Ponchel F. Cytokines as biomarkers in rheumatoid arthritis. Mediators of inflammation. 2014;2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Takeuchi T, Yoshida H, Tanaka S. Role of interleukin-6 in bone destruction and bone repair in rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmunity Reviews. 2021;20(9):102884. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2021.102884 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dayer J-M, Choy E. Therapeutic targets in rheumatoid arthritis: the interleukin-6 receptor. Rheumatology. 2010;49(1):15–24. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kep329 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Robak T, Gladalska A, Stepień H, Robak E. Serum levels of interleukin-6 type cytokines and soluble interleukin-6 receptor in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Mediators of inflammation. 1998;7:347–53. doi: 10.1080/09629359890875 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Walker JG, Smith MD. The Jak-STAT pathway in rheumatoid arthritis. The Journal of rheumatology. 2005;32(9):1650–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ding Q, Hu W, Wang R, Yang Q, Zhu M, Li M, et al. Signaling pathways in rheumatoid arthritis: implications for targeted therapy. Signal transduction and targeted therapy. 2023;8(1):68. doi: 10.1038/s41392-023-01331-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Harris TJ, Grosso JF, Yen H-R, Xin H, Kortylewski M, Albesiano E, et al. Cutting edge: An in vivo requirement for STAT3 signaling in TH17 development and TH17-dependent autoimmunity. The Journal of Immunology. 2007;179(7):4313–7. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.7.4313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lao M, Shi M, Zou Y, Huang M, Ye Y, Qiu Q, et al. Protein inhibitor of activated STAT3 regulates migration, invasion, and activation of fibroblast-like synoviocytes in rheumatoid arthritis. The Journal of Immunology. 2016;196(2):596–606. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1403254 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Han Z, Boyle DL, Chang L, Bennett B, Karin M, Yang L, et al. c-Jun N-terminal kinase is required for metalloproteinase expression and joint destruction in inflammatory arthritis. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2001;108(1):73–81. doi: 10.1172/JCI12466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Maini R, Taylor P. Anti-cytokine therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. Annual review of medicine. 2000;51(1):207–29. doi: 10.1146/annurev.med.51.1.207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Liu S, Ma H, Zhang H, Deng C, Xin P. Recent advances on signaling pathways and their inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical Immunology. 2021;230:108793. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2021.108793 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Lin W, Chen G, Mao Y, Ma X, Zhou J, Yu X, et al. Imperatorin inhibits proliferation, migration, and inflammation via blocking the NF-κB and MAPK pathways in rheumatoid fibroblast-like synoviocytes. ACS omega. 2022;7(34):29868–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Alam W, Khan H, Shah MA, Cauli O, Saso L. Kaempferol as a dietary anti-inflammatory agent: current therapeutic standing. Molecules. 2020;25(18):4073. doi: 10.3390/molecules25184073 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yoon HY, Lee EG, Lee H, Cho IJ, Choi YJ, Sung MS, et al. Kaempferol inhibits IL-1β-induced proliferation of rheumatoid arthritis synovial fibroblasts and the production of COX-2, PGE2 and MMPs. International journal of molecular medicine. 2013;32(4):971–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Park YH, Kim HJ, Heo TH. A directly GP130-targeting small molecule ameliorates collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) by inhibiting IL-6/GP130 signalling and Th17 differentiation. Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology. 2020;47(4):628–39. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.13215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Yue PY, Leung EP, Mak N, Wong RN. A simplified method for quantifying cell migration/wound healing in 96-well plates. Journal of biomolecular screening. 2010;15(4):427–33. doi: 10.1177/1087057110361772 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lopez-Acevedo M, Grace L, Teoh D, Whitaker R, Adams DJ, Jia J, et al. Dasatinib (BMS-35482) potentiates the activity of gemcitabine and docetaxel in uterine leiomyosarcoma cell lines. Gynecologic oncology research and practice. 2014;1(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/2053-6844-1-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Boyle WJ, Simonet WS, Lacey DL. Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature. 2003;423(6937):337–42. doi: 10.1038/nature01658 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hashizume M, Mihara M. The roles of interleukin-6 in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis. 2011;2011. doi: 10.1155/2011/765624 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Qu F, Guilak F, Mauck RL. Cell migration: implications for repair and regeneration in joint disease. Nature Reviews Rheumatology. 2019;15(3):167–79. doi: 10.1038/s41584-018-0151-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Cope AP, Schulze-Koops H, Aringer M. The central role of T cells in rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical and experimental rheumatology. 2007;25(5):S4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mbalaviele G, Novack DV, Schett G, Teitelbaum SL. Inflammatory osteolysis: a conspiracy against bone. The Journal of clinical investigation. 2017;127(6):2030–9. doi: 10.1172/JCI93356 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Takeuchi T, Tanaka Y, Ishiguro N, Yamanaka H, Yoneda T, Ohira T, et al. Effect of denosumab on Japanese patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a dose–response study of AMG 162 (Denosumab) in patients with RheumatoId arthritis on methotrexate to Validate inhibitory effect on bone Erosion (DRIVE)—a 12-month, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II clinical trial. Annals of the rheumatic diseases. 2016;75(6):983–90. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wu Q, Zhou X, Huang D, Ji Y, Kang F. IL-6 enhances osteocyte-mediated osteoclastogenesis by promoting JAK2 and RANKL activity in vitro. Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry. 2017;41(4):1360–9. doi: 10.1159/000465455 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bottini N, Firestein GS. Duality of fibroblast-like synoviocytes in RA: passive responders and imprinted aggressors. Nature Reviews Rheumatology. 2013;9(1):24–33. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2012.190 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pan D, Li N, Liu Y, Xu Q, Liu Q, You Y, et al. Kaempferol inhibits the migration and invasion of rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes by blocking activation of the MAPK pathway. International immunopharmacology. 2018;55:174–82. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2017.12.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Goldring MB. The role of the chondrocyte in osteoarthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism: Official Journal of the American College of Rheumatology. 2000;43(9):1916–26. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bijlsma JW, Berenbaum F, Lafeber FP. Osteoarthritis: an update with relevance for clinical practice. The Lancet. 2011;377(9783):2115–26. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60243-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Masanori A Murayama

7 May 2024

PONE-D-24-12536Anti-inflammatory effect of the combined treatment of LMT-28 and kaempferol in a collagen-induced arthritis mouse modelPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Heo,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please submit your revised manuscript by Jun 21 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Masanori A. Murayama

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. To comply with PLOS ONE submissions requirements, in your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the experiments involving animals and ensure you have included details on (1) methods of sacrifice, (2) methods of anesthesia and/or analgesia, and (3) efforts to alleviate suffering.

3. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: 

   "This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology [grant number. 2018R1A6A1A03025108 and 2022R1A2C2009911]."

Please state what role the funders took in the study.  If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." 

If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. 

Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition).

For example, authors should submit the following data:

- The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;

- The values used to build graphs;

- The points extracted from images for analysis.

Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study.

If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.

If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access.

5. When completing the data availability statement of the submission form, you indicated that you will make your data available on acceptance. We strongly recommend all authors decide on a data sharing plan before acceptance, as the process can be lengthy and hold up publication timelines. Please note that, though access restrictions are acceptable now, your entire data will need to be made freely accessible if your manuscript is accepted for publication. This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If you are unable to adhere to our open data policy, please kindly revise your statement to explain your reasoning and we will seek the editor's input on an exemption. Please be assured that, once you have provided your new statement, the assessment of your exemption will not hold up the peer review process.

6. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information. 

7. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels. 

  

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

8. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Thank you for submitting your manuscript. It is very interesting. However, I think this manuscript need more discussion. Please revise your manuscript according to my and reviewers comments.

1. In abstract, authors need introduce what is Kaempferol and LMT-28. This manuscript requires detail information about Kaempferol and LMT-28. The therapeutic mechanism including molecular mechanism such as receptor is unknown. At least, authors should discuss about this point.

2. In CIA model, authors should show the histological scores and anti-IIC antibody levels. Please refer Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 4;12(1):94.

3. The inhibitory effect of Kaempferol and LMT-28 in various cells is dose-dependent?

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: PONE-D-24-12536

Anti-inflammatory effect of the combined treatment of LMT-28 2 and kaempferol in a collagen-induced arthritis mouse model

Comments to Authors:

This study presents an intriguing investigation into the combined effects of LMT-28 and kaempferol in addressing rheumatoid arthritis. Given the significant burden autoimmune diseases place on patients, conquering them remains a paramount objective in modern medicine.

The paper is well-written, with clear data presentation and discussion. However, some aspects could benefit from further elaboration:

1) Mechanism of Synergy: The authors should delve deeper into the anti-inflammatory mechanisms of LMT-28 and kaempferol, explaining how their combination leads to superior therapeutic effects compared to individual treatment.

2) Clarifying Figure 1: A clear link needs to be established between Figure 1A's time points and the data presented in Figure 1C.

3) Updated Reference: A recent review on the IL-6/gp130 pathway should be cited to strengthen the argument.

4) Quantifying Histological Findings: In Figure 1C, the analysis of histological features in CIA mouse joint tissue via H&E staining requires a scoring system. The results should be presented graphically alongside the images to enhance clarity.

5) Missing Methodology: The "Materials and Methods" section lacks details regarding the experimental methods used with chondrocytes C28/I2. This needs to be addressed.

Reviewer #2: This study describes the synergistic effects of LMT-28 and kaemppferol on rheumatoid arthritis (RA), particularly on differentiation, migration, and invasion of synovial cells. Overall, the study is well designed and the manuscript is written well. There are several comments:

1. Authors need to discuss more in detail what made you specifically choose kaempferol as a candidate drug to investigate the synergistic effect of LMT-28. How about other anti-inflammatory drugs?

2. In a previous study, LMT-28 was reported to be effective in suppressing the development of RA by inhibiting the activation of the IL-6 signaling pathway in a CIA mouse model. In this manuscript, however, the activation of signaling pathways did not seem to be inhibited by single-treatment of LMT-28. Authors should explain why the effect of LMT-28 on signaling pathway activation in RA-FLS was shown to be different in this study.

3. Authors described that LMT-28 or the combination therapy decreased or improved the incidence of RA. Since the treatment was administered before the onset of RA, it can be considered to be effective in preventing RA. The preventative effect is different from reducing or improving existing arthritis. Please revise these statements throughout the manuscript.

4. Gene nomenclature for all mouse- and human-derived genes, such as transcription factors and MMPs, needs to be modified according to the standard notation.

Reviewer #3: PONE-D-24-12536

Comments to Authors:

This is a well conducted study regarding the combination effect of LMT-28 and kaempferol on collagen-induced arthritis (CIA). The authors showed the suppressive effects of combination treatment with LMT-28 and kaempferol on the progression of arthritis in CIA model. In addition, the combination treatment inhibited Th17-cell differentiation both in vitro and in vivo and activated regulatory T cell proportion in vivo. Combination treatment also inhibited various functions of RA-FLS and chondrocytes in terms of their proliferation, migration, and invasion.

These results collectively indicated that the combination treatment with LMT-28 and kaempferol has a potential therapeutic merit to treat rheumatoid arthritis. In order to make more complete story, authors need to address following points.

1. In the abstract, authors need to choose either combined treatment or combination treatment for consistency.

2. Enhanced effects on signaling pathway / synergistic effects on RA development

-> Enhanced (negative or antagonistic) effects should be make more sense in the context.

3. Line 82, disease activity -> disease severity

4. Line 95, synergistic effects -> potential effects since it is before experiment . Therefore, they do not know whether they have any synergistic effects.

5. Line 98, by regulating -> by downregulating

6. Introduction-Rationale. It is not entirely clear to me why the authors decided to test the LMT-28/kaempferol combination as a potential RA treatment (in vitro/in vivo). Although often different treatments may be combined to produce a greater effect, still the authors need to expand on the underlying biology of the individual compounds and why their combination may yield synergistic effect.

7. Lines 38 – 40 and 324 – 325: the sentences are ambiguous. Can the authors please reformulate these sentences?

8. Lines 334 – 336: the sentences are ambiguous. Can the authors please reformulate these sentences?

9. Lines 301 -302: lack references.

10. In Figure 6, the efficacy of the combination treatment was measured using the chondrocyte C28/I2 cell line. I couldn't find this in the material and methods section. Please add it.

11. Line 324, enhanced effect -> enhanced negative or inhibitory effect

12. Line 336, synergistic effect ->synergistic negative or inhibitory effect

13. Line 362, co-treatment improved the invasive activity of chondrocytes -> co-treatment dampened or neutralized the invasive activity of chondrocytes

14. Line 410, enhanced effect -> enhanced negative or inhibitory effect.

15. It would be better to make all the units as mg/kg instead of mpk.

16. Figure 1A Kaem 10 mpk -> Kaempferol 10 mg/kg

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Jul 31;19(7):e0302119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302119.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


28 May 2024

PLoS One

Responses to the reviewer’s comments:

We appreciate the opportunity to revise our manuscript. We had carefully considered all comments and tried to describe in detail and correct all requiring corrections. Our point-wise responses to the reviewers’ comments are given below. We hope that this revision is sufficiently improved the paper will be accepted for publication in PLOS ONE.

Our detailed responses are described below:

Journal Requirements:

1. To comply with PLOS ONE submissions requirements, in your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the experiments involving animals and ensure you have included details on (1) methods of sacrifice, (2) methods of anesthesia and/or analgesia, and (3) efforts to alleviate suffering.

Response: In the Materials and Methods section, we have added more details about how animals were euthanized and efforts to alleviate suffering in experimental animals.

2. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure:

"This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology [grant number. 2018R1A6A1A03025108 and 2022R1A2C2009911]."

Please state what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role, please state: "The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript." If this statement is not correct you must amend it as needed. Please include this amended Role of Funder statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Response: We added the following sentence to the cover letter: “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.”.

3. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Response: The retracted references were removed and replaced, detailed below.

1) The existing reference ‘Amarasekara DS, Yun H, Kim S, Lee N, Kim H, Rho J. Regulation of osteoclast differentiation by cytokine networks. Immune network. 2018;18(1).’ was replaced with ‘Amarasekara DS, Kim S, Rho J. Regulation of osteoblast differentiation by cytokine networks. International journal of molecular sciences. 2021;22(6):2851.’ and numbered [11].

2) The retracted reference ‘Martel-Pelletier J, Barr AJ, Cicuttini FM, Conaghan PG, Cooper C, Goldring MB, et al. Osteoarthritis. Nature reviews Disease primers. 2016;2(1):1-18.’ was replaced with ‘Goldring MB. The role of the chondrocyte in osteoarthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism: Official Journal of the American College of Rheumatology. 2000;43(9):1916-26.’ and numbered [45].

Additional Editor Comments:

1. In abstract, authors need introduce what is Kaempferol and LMT-28. This manuscript requires detail information about Kaempferol and LMT-28. The therapeutic mechanism including molecular mechanism such as receptor is unknown. At least, authors should discuss about this point.

Response: Thank you for your comment. We added the detailed information about LMT-28 and kaempferol in abstract section.

2. In CIA model, authors should show the histological scores and anti-IIC antibody levels. Please refer Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 4;12(1):94.

Response: Thank you for your comment. We conducted histological analysis in the CIA model and attached the revised data to the manuscript (Fig 1D).

In a previous study, it was confirmed that the increased level of anti-CII IgG in CIA control mouse serum was significantly reduced in the mouse group administered LMT-28. The results of the study were published in the Journal of Immunology in 2015 (Hong, Soon-Sun, et al. "A novel small-molecule inhibitor targeting the IL-6 receptor β subunit, glycoprotein 130." The Journal of Immunology (2015) 195(1): 237-245). Based on the effect of LMT-28 administration confirmed in previous studies, it is expected that anti-CII IgG production will be inhibited by co-administration of LMT-28 and kaempferol in CIA model. The combination of LMT-28 and kaempferol effectively inhibited toe swelling and bending in mice and inhibited histopathological phenomena, such as inflammation, synovial hyperplasia, pannus formation, and erosion of cartilage and bone in CIA mouse model. In addition, the serum levels of IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-17A in the serum of CIA mice down-regulated by combination of LMT-28 and kaempferol. These results show that the combination of LMT-28 and kaempferol synergistically inhibits synovial inflammation in the CIA mouse model.

3. The inhibitory effect of Kaempferol and LMT-28 in various cells is dose-dependent?

Response: In a previous study, LMT-28 dose-dependently inhibited cell proliferation of IL-6 dependent TF-1 cell (Hong, Soon-Sun, et al. "A novel small-molecule inhibitor targeting the IL-6 receptor β subunit, glycoprotein 130." The Journal of Immunology 2015, 195(1): 237-245). Additionally, LMT-28 inhibited hyper IL-6-induced cell proliferation of MH7A cell (Park, Yeon‐Hwa, Hee Jung Kim, and Tae‐Hwe Heo. "A directly GP130‐targeting small molecule ameliorates collagen‐induced arthritis (CIA) by inhibiting IL‐6/GP130 signalling and Th17 differentiation." Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology 2020, 47(4): 628-639).

Kaempferol also showed dose-dependent inhibitory effects on various cell types. In a previous study, kaempferol dose-dependently inhibited IL-6-induced COX-2 expression and STAT3 phosphorylation in THP-1 cell (Basu, Anandita, et al. "STAT3 and NF-κB are common targets for kaempferol-mediated attenuation of COX-2 expression in IL-6-induced macrophages and carrageenan-induced mouse paw edema." Biochemistry and biophysics reports 2017, 12: 54-61). Additionally, kaempferol suppressed the MAPK pathway activation and CIA symptoms in a dose-dependent manner (Pan, Dongmei, et al. "Kaempferol inhibits the migration and invasion of rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes by blocking activation of the MAPK pathway." International immunopharmacology 2018, 55: 174-182).

We previously used MH7A cells to test whether kaempferol could suppress the proliferation of RA-FLS by preliminary experiments. Kaempferol significantly suppressed the proliferation of MH7A cells in a dose-dependent manner. Co-treatment with LMT-28 and kaempferol in in a dose-dependent manner effectively inhibited the IL-6-induced MH7A cell proliferation (under figure).

Review Comments to the Author

Reviewer #1

1. Mechanism of Synergy: The authors should delve deeper into the anti-inflammatory mechanisms of LMT-28 and kaempferol, explaining how their combination leads to superior therapeutic effects compared to individual treatment.

Response: Thank you for comments. In the Introduction section, we added the following explanation as to why we designed the combined treatment of LMT-28 and kaempferol in this study.

“Kaempferol, used as a combination partner of LMT-28 in this study, is a type of flavonoid and is reported to have anti-inflammatory and anticancer effects in various immune diseases. Additionally, in a previous study, kaempferol inhibited the migration and invasion activity of RA-FLS by inhibiting the activation of the MAPK pathway. Based on previous research, this study designed the combined administration of LMT-28 and kaempferol to confirm further improved anti-arthritis effects by simultaneously targeting the JAK/STAT pathway and MAPK pathway, which are major signaling pathways that play an important role in arthritis development.”.

2. Clarifying Figure 1: A clear link needs to be established between Figure 1A's time points and the data presented in Figure 1C.

Response: The histological analysis described in Fig 1C were performed at the day 70 after the first immunization. As you suggested, we added a description to the results section of Figure 1C.

3. Updated Reference: A recent review on the IL-6/gp130 pathway should be cited to strengthen the argument.

Response: Based on your comment, we cited the most recent review paper related to the IL-6/gp130 pathway (Ding, Qian, et al. "Signaling pathways in rheumatoid arthritis: implications for targeted therapy." Signal transduction and targeted therapy 8.1 (2023): 68.) and reference numbered [24].

4. Quantifying Histological Findings: In Figure 1C, the analysis of histological features in CIA mouse joint tissue via H&E staining requires a scoring system. The results should be presented graphically alongside the images to enhance clarity.

Response: We agree with your opinion. We conducted histological analysis in the CIA model and attached the revised data to the manuscript (Fig 1D). The combination of LMT-28 and kaempferol effectively inhibited histopathological phenomena, such as inflammation, synovial hyperplasia, pannus formation, and erosion of cartilage and bone in CIA mouse model. Table 2 was added including histopathological scoring criteria: Inflammation, synovial hyperplasia, pannus formation, erosion of cartilage and bone.

5. Missing Methodology: The "Materials and Methods" section lacks details regarding the experimental methods used with chondrocytes C28/I2. This needs to be addressed.

Response: We added information about the C28/I2 cell line to the Materials and Methods section.

Reviewer #2

1. Authors need to discuss more in detail what made you specifically choose kaempferol as a candidate drug to investigate the synergistic effect of LMT-28. How about other anti-inflammatory drugs?

Response: Thank you for your comment. We added the reasons for designing the combination of LMT-28 and kaempferol in the Introduction section. In our previous study, we investigated whether the combined treatment of LMT-28 and metformin has synergistic inhibitory effect on arthritis in CIA mouse model (Park, Yeon-Hwa, et al. "Combination of LMT-28 and metformin improves beneficial anti-inflammatory effect in collagen-induced arthritis." Pharmacology 2021, 106(1-2): 53-59). Additionally, combined treatment of TNF-targeting tetrahydropapaverine (THP) and LMT-28 suppressed RA development via inhibiting Th17 cell and osteoclast differentiation (Park, Yeon-Hwa, et al. "Combination of gp130-targeting and TNF-targeting small molecules in alleviating arthritis through the down-regulation of Th17 differentiation and osteoclastogenesis." Biochemical and biophysical research communications 2020, 522(4): 1030-1036). There was synergistic effect with LMT-28 in combination with other anti-inflammatory agents, metformin and THP in CIA model. However, previous studies did not confirm inhibitory effects on cellular activities such as RA-FLS and chondrocyte migration and invasion. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to confirm the synergistic inhibitory effect on synovial cell hyperactivation through combined treatment with kaempferol.

2. In a previous study, LMT-28 was reported to be effective in suppressing the development of RA by inhibiting the activation of the IL-6 signaling pathway in a CIA mouse model. In this manuscript, however, the activation of signaling pathways did not seem to be inhibited by single-treatment of LMT-28. Authors should explain why the effect of LMT-28 on signaling pathway activation in RA-FLS was shown to be different in this study.

Response: Thank you for your comment. We added the comment in the discussion section. Detailed below:

“In a previous study, single treatment of LMT-28 did not effectively inhibit the phosphorylation of signaling molecules induced by IL-6 at concentrations below 50 μM, but in this study, the co-administration of 25 μM LMT-28 with kaempferol inhibited the phosphorylation of the signaling molecules. These results demonstrate the improved inhibitory effect of LMT-28 and kaempferol combination on the hyperactivation of IL-6-induced signaling pathways in RA-FLS.”

3. Authors described that LMT-28 or the combination therapy decreased or improved the incidence of RA. Since the treatment was administered before the onset of RA, it can be considered to be effective in preventing RA. The preventative effect is different from reducing or improving existing arthritis. Please revise these statements throughout the manuscript.

Response: This study is a prevention model in which LMT-28 and kaempferol were administered before the onset of arthritis. Applying your comments, we appropriately revised the descriptions such as ‘reduce’ and ‘decrease’.

4. Gene nomenclature for all mouse- and human-derived genes, such as transcription factors and MMPs, needs to be modified according to the standard notation.

Response: We have modified the gene nomenclature for the mouse and human -derived genes in the revised manuscript in accordance with the standard notation.  

Reviewer #3

1. In the abstract, authors need to choose either combined treatment or combination treatment for consistency.

Response: Thank you for your comment. For consistency of expression, the sentences were modified to ‘combined treatment’.

2. Enhanced effects on signaling pathway / synergistic effects on RA development

-> Enhanced (negative or antagonistic) effects should be make more sense in the context.

Response: Thank you for your comment. Applying your comments, descriptions in this manuscript were revised to make more sense.

3. Line 82, disease activity -> disease severity

Response: The 'Disease Activity' description was modified to 'Disease Severity'.

4. Line 95, synergistic effects -> potential effects since it is before experiment. Therefore, they do not know whether they have any synergistic effects.

Response: The expression 'synergistic' was removed and the description was modified.

5. Line 98, by regulating -> by downregulating

Response: The word has been modified.

6. Introduction-Rationale. It is not entirely clear to me why the authors decided to test the LMT-28/kaempferol combination as a potential RA treatment (in vitro/in vivo). Although often different treatments may be combined to produce a greater effect, still the authors need to expand on the underlying biology of the individual compounds and why their combination may yield synergistic effect.

Response: Thank you for your comment. In the Introduction section, we described the biological mechanism by which the combination of LMT-28 and kaempferol exerts synergistic effects. Detailed below:

“Kaempferol, used as a combination partner of LMT-28 in this study, is a type of flavonoid and is reported to have anti-inflammatory and anticancer effects in various immune diseases. Additionally, kaempferol inhibited the migration and invasion activity of RA-FLS by inhibiting the activation of the MAPK pathway. In our previous study, we demonstrated that LMT-28 exerts a therapeutic effect on RA development by inhibiting the IL-6-induced signaling pathways; however, it remains unclear whether LMT-28 has a regulatory effect on RA-FLS migration and invasion. Based on previous research, this study designed the combined administration of LMT-28 and kaempferol to confirm further improved preventive effects of combination on the hyperactivation of RA-FLS and RA development by simultaneously targeting the JAK/STAT pathway and MAPK pathway, which are major signaling pathways that play an important role in arthritis development.”.

7. Lines 38 – 40 and 324 – 325: the sentences are ambiguous. Can the authors please reformulate these sentences?

Response: We revised the sentences.

8. Lines 334 – 336: the sentences are ambiguous. Can the authors please reformulate these sentences?

Response: We revised the sentences.

9. Lines 301 -302: lack references.

Response: We added the reference (Ref #36. Boyle, William J., W. Scott Simonet, and David L. Lacey. "Osteoclast differentiation and activation." Nature 2

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

pone.0302119.s003.docx (151.9KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Masanori A Murayama

2 Jun 2024

Anti-inflammatory effect of the combined treatment of LMT-28 and kaempferol in a collagen-induced arthritis mouse model

PONE-D-24-12536R1

Dear Dr. Heo,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Masanori A. Murayama

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Thank you for re-submitting your manuscript. I am grad for sending you this letter. Your manuscript is remarkable for publish. Congratulations.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The author's revisions and responses to major revisions have all proven to be scientifically valid and reliable.

Reviewer #2: Authors properly made responses to reviewer's comments and revised the manuscript well, which is most likely acceptable for publication.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Masanori A Murayama

22 Jul 2024

PONE-D-24-12536R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Heo,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Masanori A. Murayama

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Raw images. Whole membrane images of western blotting analysis.

    (PDF)

    pone.0302119.s001.pdf (290.4KB, pdf)
    S1 Raw data

    (ZIP)

    pone.0302119.s002.zip (90.9KB, zip)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0302119.s003.docx (151.9KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES