Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 31;2013(8):CD006574. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006574.pub4

Comparison 3. Abdominal wall lift (AWL) versus pneumoperitoneum (PP) ‐ subgroup analyses.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Serious adverse events 5   Rate Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 AWL with pneumoperitoneum 2   Rate Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI) 1.0 [0.17, 5.77]
1.2 AWL without pneumoperitoneum 3   Rate Ratio (Fixed, 95% CI) 1.73 [0.35, 8.61]
2 Conversion to open cholecystectomy 13 518 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.76 [0.26, 2.21]
2.1 AWL with pneumoperitoneum 2 58 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.2 AWL without pneumoperitoneum 11 460 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.76 [0.26, 2.21]
3 Operating time 20 756 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 9.20 [4.40, 14.00]
3.1 AWL with pneumoperitoneum 4 107 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 13.39 [‐2.73, 29.51]
3.2 AWL without pneumoperitoneum 16 649 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 8.53 [3.48, 13.58]