Vezakis 1999.
Methods | Randomised clinical trial. | |
Participants | Country: United Kingdom.
Number randomised: 36.
Mean age: 52 years.
Females: 29 (80.6%). Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
|
|
Interventions | Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: Group 1: abdominal wall lift (n = 18). Group 2: pneumoperitoneum with 8 mm Hg pressure (n = 18). Device used for abdominal lift: subcutaneous device. |
|
Outcomes | The main outcome measures were operating time and hospital stay. | |
Notes | Two cross‐over from abdominal wall lift group: 1 because of inadequate exposure; 1 because of necessity to perform laparoscopic CBD exploration. Attempts were made to contact the author in February 2007. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "Randomisation was performed preoperatively using envelopes with random numbers." |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "Randomisation was performed preoperatively using envelopes with random numbers." Comment: further details of the sealed envelope were not available. |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: This information was not available. |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Comment: This information was not available. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | High risk | Comment: There were postrandomisation drop‐outs. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | High risk | Comment: Important outcomes were not reported. |
Vested interest bias | Unclear risk | Comment: This information was not available. |