Skip to main content
. 2023 Oct 31;63(8):2222–2229. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead574

Table 3.

Outcomes in the 6-month period after hospitalizations for gout flares, comparing the pre- and post-implementation cohorts

Outcome Pre-implementation, n (%) (n = 94) Post-implementation, n (%) (n = 97) Odds ratio (95% CI) P-value
Receiving ULT by 6 months 61 (64.9) 91 (93.8) 7.68 (3.02, 19.6) <0.001
ULT initiated in hospital or within 6 months of discharge
 Yes 32 (49.2) 72 (92.3) 11.5 (4.36, 30.5) <0.001
 No 33 (50.8) 6 (7.7)
 Receiving ULT pre-admission 29 19
Prophylaxis prescribed while initiating ULT
 Yes 8 (25.0) 21 (29.2) 1.12 (0.42, 2.98) 0.81
 No 24 (75.0) 51 (70.8)
 Not newly initiated on ULT 62 25
Serum urate performed at least once within 6 months 30 (31.9) 56 (57.7) 2.88 (1.58, 5.25) 0.001
Serum urate ≤360 μmol/l within 6 months 10 (10.6) 26 (26.8) 3.04 (1.36, 6.78) 0.007
Serum urate ≤300 μmol/l within 6 months 5 (5.3) 13 (13.4) 2.65 (0.89, 7.84) 0.079
Rheumatology outpatient clinic within 6 months 8 (8.5) 16 (16.5) 2.08 (0.82, 5.28) 0.12
Gout telephone clinic within 6 months N/A 79 (81.4)
Re-presented to hospital within 6 months 14 (14.9) 9 (9.3) 0.53 (0.22, 1.32) 0.18

Odds ratios from logistic regression models are shown, with adjustment for age and sex. A gout telephone clinic was established as part of the intervention package, and therefore was not available to patients in the pre-implementation cohort. N/A: not available; ULT: urate-lowering therapy.