Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Aging Ment Health. 2017 Feb 16;22(4):458–467. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1286451

Table 3.

AIC Model Fit for Models Predicting Anxiolytic and Antipsychotic Use

Variable Set Included in the Model*
Model Rank PWD Race/Ethnicity Site A B C D E AIC ΔAIC Weight Rank of Equivalent Model Without Race Evidence Ratio
Anxiolytics
1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 477.85 0.00 0.58 4 14.38
2 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 481.83 3.98 0.08 10 6.00
3 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 483.16 5.31 0.04 21 16.97
21 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 489.32 11.32 <0.01 NA NA
110 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 499.74 21.89 <0.01 125 11.95
Antipsychotics
1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 616.26 0.00 0.51 2 3.03
2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 618.48 2.22 0.17 - -
3 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 619.29 3.03 0.11 4 3.88
50 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 632.21 16.21 <0.01 NA NA
82 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 636.41 20.16 <0.01 67 0.33
*

Inclusion in the model is indicated by 1, exclusion is indicated by 0

Set A: PWD variables (cognitive impairment, functional impairment, problem behavior frequency, pain, relationship to the caregiver, sex, and age

Set B: caregiver health variables (self-reported health both current and current compared to six months previous, and depression)

Set C: perceptions of caregiving (caregiving burden, bother assisting with functional impairments, bother handling problem behaviors, confidence handling problem behaviors, caregiving mastery, vigilance, and positive aspects of caregiving)

Set D: non-financial caregiving resources (spiritual and religious coping, social network size, social network satisfaction, negative social interaction, and dementia knowledge

Set E: caregiver socioeconomic status (education, employment, income, and income adequacy)

Evidence ratio comparing model with race to an equivalent model without race