Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 22;15(4):1226–1239. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.13477

Table 4.

Sensitivity and subgroup meta‐analyses of the association between cachexia or weight loss ≥ 5% and overall survival in non‐small‐cell lung cancer: Random‐effects model

Type of analysis/variable No. of studies Sample size HR (95% CI) I2 (%)
Base‐case analysis (REM) 16 6225 1.82 (1.47, 2.25) 88.2
Sensitivity analyses
Age 15 6080 1.68 (1.40, 2.01) 81.5
Gender 13 3917 2.00 (1.53, 2.61) 85.7
Performance status 12 5615 1.78 (1.43, 2.23) 88.1
Disease stage 14 5678 1.98 (1.60, 2.43) 85.7
Subgroup analyses
Geographic region
Asia 6 1511 2.26 (1.72, 2.97) 55.9
Europe/UK 3 1436 2.02 (1.11, 3.68) 80.6
US/Canada 5 1805 1.34 (1.12, 1.61) 34.1
NR/other 2 1473 1.67 (1.46, 1.92) 0
Follow‐up time
<1 year 4 1347 2.32 (1.37, 3.92) 72.1
1–3 years 7 1700 2.15 (1.68, 2.75) 56.6
>3 years 3 1916 1.27 (0.95, 1.69) 68.4
NR 2 1262 1.29 (1.13, 1.46) 0
Cachexia definition
IC criteria 11 3370 2.26 (1.80, 2.83) 73.0
WL ≥ 5% 5 2855 1.28 (1.12, 1.46) 39.7

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; I2, heterogeneity statistic; IC, international consensus; NR, not reported; REM, random‐effects model; UK, United Kingdom; US, United States; WL, weight loss.