Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 1;10:106. doi: 10.1038/s41378-024-00733-1

Table 1.

Comparison of pneumatically actuated microsystems

Valve type Advantages Limitations Applications
Lifting-gate valve (normally closed, actuate to open)

High pumping efficiency

Used in series to form micropumps

Need for valve passivation to avoid them becoming permanently closed

Pumping backflow causes unsteady laminar flow

Precise metering of reagents33

Rapid biosensing and point-of-care diagnostics30

Quake valve (normally opened, actuate to close)

Used to interrupt flow without causing unsteady laminar flow

Used to create a concentration gradient

Poor resolution for flow metering

The height and the width of the valve cannot be designed independently

Immunoassays50

Cell sorting51

System combination of lifting gate and quake valves

Leveraged the pumping capabilities of normally closed valves for high-efficiency fluidic manipulations

Uses normally opened valves to block flow at a targeted location to create isolated chambers

Allows the formation of a concentration gradient in channels

Fabrication challenges due to non-compatibility of photoresists and developers for normally closed and normally opened valves

Drug screening to cells

Cell co-culture

Cell migration to a gradient