Skip to main content
. 2024 May 21;110(4):273–283. doi: 10.1177/03008916241252544

Table 4.

Comparison of average and median Dmean of defined organs at risk (OARs) between volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT).

Dmean of the OARs (Gy)
Average Median
Oral Cavity VMAT 18.17 17.78
IMPT 5.40 4.48
Δdose 12.76 12.67
p-value (VMAT vs. IMPT) <.00001
Larynx VMAT 11.56 8.78
IMPT 7.26 4.58
Δdose 4.3 3.48
P value (VMAT vs. IMPT) <.00001
PCM VMAT 27.64 27.97
IMPT 17.34 17.31
Δdose 10.30 10.43
P value (VMAT vs. IMPT) <.00001
Contralateral Parotid VMAT 6.65 6.26
IMPT 0,00 0,00
Δdose 6.64 6.25
P value (VMAT vs. IMPT) <.00001
Contralateral Submandibular gland VMAT 8.31 8.94
IMPT 0.03 0
Δdose 8.28 8.94
P value (VMAT vs. IMPT) <.00001
Supraglottic Larynx VMAT 16.05 15.95
IMPT 9.44 7.6
Δdose 6.61 7.41
P value (VMAT vs. IMPT) <.00001
Ipsilateral Cochlea VMAT 33.20 28.12
IMPT 29.53 30.4
Δdose 3.67 5.51
P value (VMAT vs. IMPT) .01314
Ipsilateral Inner ear VMAT 29.45 23.82
IMPT 25.18 23.05
Δdose 4.27 6.003
P value (VMAT vs. IMPT) .00252

Bold values denote statistical significance at the p < 0.05 level.