Skip to main content
. 2024 Jul 9;24(3):100483. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2024.100483

Table 2.

Significant interaction effect of sFC and dFC of subregion in the cerebellum between BLT and placebo at pre and post-treatment.

Seeds Significant regions BA voxels MNI
F-statistic Post VS. Pre (t, p)
BLT VS. Placebo (t, p)
x y z BLT Placebo Pre Post
sFC
L Crus I L Cerebellum Posterior Lobe NA 37 −15 −63 −42 17.636 −1.474, 0.147 3.638, <0.001 0.300, 0.765 −4.065, < 0.001
L Crus II Bilateral Cerebellum Posterior Lobe NA 15 9 −57 −39 22.367 −2.576, 0.013 3.679, 0.001 1.469, 0.146 −4.066, < 0.001
R IX L Cerebellum Posterior Lobe NA 67 −18 −90 −30 20.314 −3.182, 0.003 3.323, 0.002 2.221, 0.029 −2.720, 0.008
L Temporal Pole 38 42 −51 15 −30 14.827 2.413, 0.020 −4.221, < 0.001 −2.524, 0.013 3.184, 0.002
dFC
R IX L SFG 9 23 −12 45 36 19.983 −3.126, 0.003 3.019, 0.004 3.141, 0.002 −3.071, 0.003

sFC, static functional connectivity; dFC, dynamic FC; BLT, bright light therapy; BA, Brodmann region; MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; SFG, superior frontal gyrus; L, left; R, right.