Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 2;103(31):e38827. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038827

Table 1.

Main characteristics of the studies.

Study Study design State or regions Zone Age Number of cervical cancer patients Number of HPV-positive samples Method of testing HPV
Baskaran 2015[1] Prospective observational study Tamil Nadu South 30–65 years 67 63 PCR
Basu 2009[2] Cross-sectional study West Bengal,
Karnataka,
New Delhi,
Maharashtra
Multiple 51.4 (mean) 278 232 PCR
Bhatla 2006[3] Cross-sectional study New-Delhi North NA 106 104 PCR
Das 2013[4] Cross-sectional study Assam East NA 107 105 Nested PCR
Gautam 2023[5] Cross-sectional study New-Delhi North NA 108 78 PCR
Gheit 2009[6] Cross-sectional study Maharashtra Central NA 168 113 PCR
Kumar 2021[7] Cross-sectional study Bihar East NA 96 96 PCR
Kuriakose 2020[8] Cross-sectional study Kerala South 56 (mean) 114 90 PCR
Nagaraja 2023[9] Cross-sectional study Andhra Pradesh South NA 204 163 NM-PCR
Patel 2014[10] Cross-sectional study Gujarat West 51.3 (mean) 52 31 PCR
Peedicayil 2006[11] Cross-sectional study Tamil Nadu South NA 119 113 PCR
Saranath 2002[12] Cross-sectional study Maharashtra Central NA 337 258 PCR
Sontakke 2019[13] Cross-sectional study Maharashtra Central NA 144 82 PCR
Srivastava 2021[14] Cross-sectional study Uttar Pradesh North 21 (mean) 130 17 PCR
Thobias 2021[15] Cohort study Ahmedabad West NA 400 348 PCR
Sowjanya 2005[16] Prospective observational study Hyderabad South 55 (median) 41 36 PCR-based line blot assay
Gupta 2022[17] Cross-sectional study Bhopal South 31–70 years 58 48 Multiplex RT-PCR

NM-PCR = non-multiplex polymerase chain reaction, PCR = polymerase chain reaction.