Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Aug 2.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Breast Surg. 2023 Nov 10;8:19. doi: 10.21037/abs-23-33

Table 1.

Studies that compared mastectomy with breast reconstruction and mastectomy alone

Study authors Year Country Study type Groups Total (n) MBR (n) MA (n) Mental health scales used Mental health impact: directionality of MBR vs. MA
de Raaff et al. (9) 2016 Netherlands Retrospective cross-sectional MBR vs. MA 139 34 105 Beck Positive
Li et al. (10) 2021 China Prospective cohort MBR vs. MA 152 102 50 FACT-B, SAS, SDS Positive
Szadowska-Szlachetka et al. (11) 2013 Poland Retrospective cross-sectional MBR vs. MA 241 108 133 Beck, EORTC Positive
Tønseth et al. (12) 2007 Norway Retrospective cross-sectional MBR vs. MA 58 34 24 SF-36 Positive
Fanakidou et al. (13) 2018 Greece Retrospective cross-sectional MBR vs. MA 81 35 46 DASS-21 Positive
Fortunato et al. (14) 2021 Italy Retrospective cross-sectional MBR vs. MA 328 172 156 EORTC Positive
Gardikiotis et al. (15) 2016 Romania Retrospective cross-sectional MBR vs. MA 50 23 27 SF-36 Positive
Ismagilov et al. (16) 2011 Russia Retrospective cross-sectional MBR vs. MA 374 132 242 SF-36 Positive
Bredicean et al. (17) 2020 Romania Prospective cohort MBR vs. MA 64 36 28 DASS-21 Positive
Al-Ghazal et al. (18) 2000 UK Retrospective cross-sectional MBR vs. MA vs. BCS 577 121 202 HADS, RSE Positive
Retrouvey et al. (19) 2019 Canada Prospective cohort MBR vs. MA vs. BCS 303 70 78 HADS, IES Positive
Archangelo et al. (20) 2019 Brazil Retrospective cross-sectional MBR vs. MA vs. normal population 90 30 30 Beck Positive
Rubino et al. (21) 2007 Italy Prospective cohort IBR vs. MA vs. normal pop 99 33 33 HAM-A, HAM-D Positive
Hunsinger et al. (22) 2016 France Retrospective cross-sectional MBR vs. MA vs. normal population 3,513 70 135 SF-36 Positive
Fernández-Delgado et al. (23) 2008 Spain Retrospective cross-sectional IBR vs. MA vs. normal pop 377 263 114 HADS, RSE Positive
Pusic et al. (24) 1999 USA Retrospective cross-sectional MBR vs. MA vs. BCS 267 102 71 SF-36 Positive
Kovačević et al. (25) 2020 Russia Retrospective cross-sectional MBR vs. MA vs. BCS 425 54 256 WHOQoL-Bref, FACT-B Positive
Pérez-San-Gregorio et al. (26) 2013 Spain Retrospective cross-sectional MBR vs. MA vs. organ transplant vs. normal population 706 36 36 HADS Positive
Holly et al. (27) 2003 UK Retrospective cross-sectional MBR vs. MA 64 30 34 HADS, RSE Neutral
Wehrens et al. (28) 2005 Netherlands Retrospective cross-sectional MBR vs. MA 222 67 155 POMS Neutral
Nicholson et al. (29) 2007 UK Retrospective cross-sectional MBR vs. MA vs. BCS 99 39 46 HADS, SF-36, DAS-59 Neutral
Harcourt et al. (5) 2003 UK Prospective cohort Immediate BR vs. delayed BR vs. MA 103 56 47 HADS, EORTC Neutral
Metcalfe et al. (30) 2012 Canada Prospective cohort Immediate BR vs. delayed BR vs. MA 190 81 109 BSI, IES Neutral
Nano et al. (31) 2005 Australia Retrospective cross-sectional MBR vs. MA vs. BCS 310 123 78 FACT-B Neutral
Clark et al. (32) 2011 UK Prospective cohort MBR vs. MA 133 29 104 HADS Negative
Adachi et al. (33) 2007 Japan Retrospective cross-sectional MBR vs. MA vs. BCS 102 11 25 POMS Negative

MBR, mastectomy with breast reconstruction; MA, mastectomy alone; FACT-B, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Breast; BSI, brief symptom inventory; SAS, Self-rating Anxiety Scale; SDS, Self-rating Depression Scale; EORTC, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Instruments; SF-36, Short Form – 36 items; DASS-21, Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale – 21 items; BCS, breast-conserving surgery; HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; RSE, Rosenberg Self Esteem Scale; IES, Impact of Events Scale; IBR, immediate breast reconstruction; HAM-A, Hamilton Anxiety Ranking Scale; HAM-D, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; WHOQoL-Bref, World Health Organization Quality of Life Scale Brief Version; POMS, Profile of Mood States; DAS-59, Derriford Appearance Scale 59.