Skip to main content
. 2024 Apr 12;28(4):1239–1247. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03012-0

Table 3.

Multivariate model-adjusted resource utilization outcomes for patients undergoing open hernia repair using barbed TCS vs. conventional PDS suture

Type of suture
Barbed TCS Conventional PDS suture
n = 446 n = 375
Index procedure
 Operative time, mean [95% CI] 171.29 [163.28–179.31] 144.31 [135.56–153.05]
 Hospital LOS, mean [95% CI] 5.70 [4.92–6.62] 8.18 [7.33–9.14]
 Number of surgical drainage days, mean [95% CI] 3.08 [2.96–3.20] 3.36 [3.23–3.49]
Follow-up: 30 days after the index procedure Barbed TCS vs. conventional PDS suture (ref)
 Readmission after the index procedure hospitalization, OR [95%CI] 4.87 [0.57–41.85]
 Reoperation, OR [95%CI] 1.42 [0.37–5.39]
Follow-up: 60 days after the index procedure Barbed TCS vs. conventional PDS suture (ref)
 Readmission after the index procedure hospitalization, OR [95%CI] 5.25 [0.61–45.15]
 Reoperation, OR [95%CI] 2.73 [0.81–9.18]