Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 2;14:17968. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68985-5

Table 8.

Comparison with AI methods.

Protection method Detection-method Feature selection Noise immunity (dB) Fault resistance withstanding ability Sampling-rate Pre-training settings Complexity in training setup time Other remarks Average-recognition rate
Ref.37 ANN DWT High (18.0 dB) High (350.0 Ω) Medium Trial and error Medium A generalized linear model to set up hyperparameters of a non-linear model causes miss-convergence at a small window length 90.61%
Ref.16 ANN Voltages Low Low (50.0 Ω) Low Trial and error High Due to the large window length, response time is slow 94.35%
Ref.38 SVM WT Not mentioned Low High Not mentioned High Do not discuss noise immunity in the complicated and dynamic environment of the MT-HVDC networks 92.92%
Ref.39 ANN Fast FT Low (50.0 dB) Low (100.0 Ω) Medium Trial and error Medium An in-depth analysis of noise immunity is missing, and the fault resistance range is -0.01–100-Ω- 88.85%
Proposed methodology Improved LSTM Norm High (20.0 dB) High (480.0 Ω) Medium Optimal settings (BO) Low Due to the optimal training solution, it is less prone to miss-convergence at a small window length 99.04%