Skip to main content
. 2005 Apr 20;2005(2):CD004539. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004539.pub2

Comparison 15. Imipenem/cilastatin versus other carbapenems.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Mortality (all causes ‐ ITT analysis)) 3 528 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.50 [0.58, 3.88]
2 Mortality (due to infection ‐ ITT analysis)) 3 528 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.79 [0.50, 6.42]
3 Clinical success 5 667 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.04 [0.62, 1.77]
4 Clinical success (ITT analysis) 2 367 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.61 [0.22, 1.65]
5 Microbiological success 4 575 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.99 [0.53, 1.87]
6 Superinfection 2 258 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.75 [0.26, 2.18]
7 Adverse reactions (ITT analysis) 4 810 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.30 [0.81, 2.10]
7.1 Overall 4 810 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.30 [0.81, 2.10]
8 Duration of treatment 1 135 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐1.10 [‐2.20, ‐0.00]
9 Days hospitalised 1 135 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.10 [‐4.52, 4.32]