Skip to main content
. 2005 Apr 20;2005(2):CD004539. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004539.pub2

Cohn 2000.

Methods Randomised, double‐blinded controlled trial. 
 Multicentre (34 USA and Canada centres) study between September 1995 and May 1997. 
 Randomisation method: not stated. 
 Assessors were blinded. 
 Patient stratification: by presence or absence of appendicitis and APACHE II score. 
 Power calculation: performed. 
 Intention‐to‐treat analysis: performed. 
 Sub‐group analysis: not performed. 
 Follow up: 3‐5 week post‐therapy (1‐3 weeks for appendicitis).
Participants Number of patients: 459. 
 Clinical and microbiologically evaluable patients: 250. 
 134 (Ciprofloxacin/metronidazole, C‐M) versus 116 (Piperacillin/tazobactam, P‐T). 
 Mean age: 47 (C‐M), 49 (P‐T). 
 Mean APACHE II score: 9.6 (C‐M), 9.5 (P‐T). 
 Inclusion criteria: patients > 18 years of age with complicated intra‐abdominal infection requiring surgical intervention or percutaneous drainage in addition to parenteral antibiotics. 
 Exclusion criteria: pregnant or breast feeding women, allergy, renal insufficiency, an indwelling peritoneal catheter, acute pancreatitis, perforated peptic ulcer or traumatic upper gastrointestinal tract perforation < 24 hours, lower gastrointestinal perforation < 12 hours, APACHE II score > 30, not expected to survive > 48 hours and prior antibiotic therapy for last 24 hours.
Interventions 2 regimens: 
 1) Ciprofloxacin 400 mg (12 hourly) and metronidazole 500 mg (6 hourly). 
 2) Piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 mg (6 hourly). 
 Timing of antibiotic infusion: pre‐operative or intra‐operatively. 
 Length: > 3 days for appendicitis, > 5 days for all other diagnoses and < 14 days. 
 After 48 hours of therapy, patients were assessed for recovery of gastrointestinal function and patients on IV C‐M were switched to oral C‐M.
Outcomes Clinical (ITT analysis) and bacteriological success. 
 Mortality (ITT analysis). 
 Wound infection and superinfection. 
 Adverse reactions (ITT analysis).
Notes Overall clinical response: 74% (C‐M) versus 63% (P‐T) (p = 0.047). 
 ITT analysis on clinical response: 75% (C‐M) versus 69% (P‐T) ( p = 0.213). 
 118/282 (42%) of patients had complicated appendicitis. 
 90% of patients had pre‐therapy (< 2 doses of other antibiotics). 
 Approximately 26% of patients had delayed primary closure of wounds. 
 Supported by grant from Bayer Corp.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear