Skip to main content
. 2005 Apr 20;2005(2):CD004539. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004539.pub2

de Groot 1993.

Methods Randomised controlled trial. 
 Single centre (Dutch) study between August 1987 and May 1989. 
 Randomisation method: sealed envelopes. 
 Blinding of assessors: not used. 
 Patient stratification: not performed. 
 Power calculation: not used. 
 Intention‐to‐treat analysis: not performed. 
 Sub‐group analysis: performed. 
 Follow up: not stated.
Participants Number of patients: 104. 
 Clinically and microbiologically evaluable patients: N = 80. 
 38 (Imipenem/cilastatin, I‐C) versus 42 (Aztreonam/clindamycin, A‐C). 
 Mean age: 58 (I‐C), 64 (A‐C). 
 Age range: 17‐90. 
 Inclusion criteria: adults with symptoms of local or generalised intra‐abdominal infections. 
 Exclusion criteria: < 15 and > 90 years of age, known hypersensitivity to study drugs, immunocompromised (unless on steroids).
Interventions 2 regimens: 
 1) Imipenem 500 mg (6 hourly) and cilastatin 500 mg (6 hourly). 
 2) Aztreonam 1 g ((8 hourly) and clindamycin 600 mg (8 hourly). 
 Timing of antibiotic infusion: intra‐operatively. 
 Length: > 5 days.
Outcomes Clinical success. 
 Mortality. 
 Wound infection, intra‐abdominal abscess, clinical sepsis, superinfection and remote infection. 
 Adverse reactions.
Notes 30/80 (38%) of patients had complicated appendicitis.No differences in outcome seen between both arms. 
 Supported in part by grant from MSD Nederland.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk A ‐ Adequate