Skip to main content
. 2005 Apr 20;2005(2):CD004539. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004539.pub2

Poenaru 1990.

Methods Randomised controlled trial. 
 Single centre (Canadian) study between September 1985 and October 1988. 
 Randomisation method: unclear. 
 Blinding of assessors: not stated. 
 Patient stratification: using APACHE II score. 
 Power calculation: not performed. 
 Intention‐to‐treat analysis: not performed. 
 Sub‐group analysis: not performed.Follow up: not stated.
Participants Number of patients: 104. 
 52 (Imipenem/cilastatin, I‐C) versus 52 (Tobramycin/antianaerobe, T‐A). 
 Mean age: 52.0 (I‐C), 57.6 (T‐A). 
 Mean APACHE II Score: 11.2 (I‐C), 13.1(T‐A). 
 Inclusion criteria: patients admitted for emergency surgery with suspected intra‐abdominal infection. 
 Exclusion criteria: pregnant, gynaecological and perianal infections, overt renal failure requiring dialysis, concomitant CNS infection and known allergy to study drugs, uncomplicated cholecystitis, appendicitis without perforation, traumatic bowel perforation < 12 hours and perforated peptic ulcer < 24 hours.
Interventions 2 regimens: 
 1) Imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg (6 hourly). 
 2) Tobramycin 1.5 mg/kg (8 hourly) and either clindamycin 600 mg (6 hourly) or metronidazole 500 mg (6 hourly). 
 Tobramycin level monitored at peak 6‐10 mcg/ml and trough < 1.5 mcg/ml. 
 Timing of antibiotic infusion: not stated. 
 Length: not stated.
Outcomes Clinical success. 
 Mortality.
Notes % of appendicitis patients: not stated.No statistically significant difference shown.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk B ‐ Unclear