Table 9.

Intensity/degree of use theory in based theory-intervention

	Alsaleh 2016 [68]	Alsale 2023 [67]	Corella,2019 [74]	Krebs, 2020 [75]	Liu JYW, 2023  [55]	Mahmoudi,2020 [70]	Plotnikoff, RC,2013 [65]	Prestwich, A, 2012  [56]	Seghers et al,2014  [62]	Shamizadeh T, 2019 [69]	Van Dyck D, 2016 60)	Van Hoye K,2018 [53]	Van Nimwegen, 2013 [64]	Vildeira Silva, 2021 [73]	Yeom, HA, 2014 [76]
1.theory mentioned	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓		✓	✓
2. Relevant constructs targeted	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓
3. change method lined to at least one construct	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓		✓	✓	✓
4. Participants selected based on a score of theory-related construct			✓		✓		✓	✓
5. intervention tailored to different subgroup				✓	✓							✓
6. At least one construct or theory measured post-intervention	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓		✓	✓
7. All theory measures presented some evidence of reliability	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓		✓	✓	✓	✓		✓
8. Results discussed in relation theory	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓		✓	✓	✓	✓			✓	✓
Score	6/8	6/8	7/8	7/8	8/8	6/8	6/8	7/8	5/8	6/8	6/8	5/8	3/8	5/8	6/8

	Balducci 2017 71)	Lynch, 2019 [59]	O’Dwyer,2013 [54]	Adams, 2013 [48]	Ashe,2015 [66]	Biddle,2015 [18]	Brakenridge, 2016 [58]	Carr, 2013 [77]	Cocker, 2016 [78]	Hadgraft, 2017 [57]	Ismail, 2022 [72]	Mendoza 2016 [51]	Van Dantzig,2011 [63]	Yan, 2009 [52]
1.theory mentioned	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓
2. Relevant constructs targeted	✓				✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓
3. change method lined to at least one construct	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓		✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓
4. Participants selected based on a score of theory-related construct
5. intervention tailored to different subgroup	✓					✓	✓	✓	✓	✓				✓
6. At least one construct or theory measured post-intervention	✓			✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓	✓			✓
7. All theory measures presented some evidence of reliability			✓		✓	✓			✓				✓
8. Results discussed in relation theory				✓	✓			✓		✓
Score	5/8	2/8	3/8	4/8	6/8	6/8	5/8	5/8	6/8	6/8	4/8	4/8	4/8	5/8