Skip to main content
International Journal of Women's Health logoLink to International Journal of Women's Health
. 2024 Jul 31;16:1315–1327. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S464129

Exploring the Intersection of Depression, Anxiety, and Sexual Health in Perimenopausal Women

Shahenda A Saleh 1, Noura Almadani 2, Rasha Mahfouz 2,, Hanaa A Nofal 3, Dina S El-Rafey 3, Dina A Seleem 4
PMCID: PMC11298183  PMID: 39100112

Abstract

Purpose

The perimenopausal period is marked by hormonal fluctuations that trigger a complex interplay between estrogen levels and neurotransmitters’ function, contributing to increased susceptibility to depression and anxiety in women. Concurrently, hormonal changes, coupled with alterations in vaginal tissue, lead to sexual dysfunction during this transitional phase. This study aimed at evaluating the association between menopausal symptoms and sexual dysfunction among perimenopausal women and identifying the mediating effects of depression and anxiety on this association.

Patients and Methods

Data for the present cross-sectional study were collected from participants via Arabic versions of three questionnaires; the modified Menopausal Rating Scale (MRS), the Female Sexual Functioning Index (FSFI) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HADS).

Results

Our study was conducted on 149 females with age ranged from 45 to 55 years. On studying the relation between modified MRS and HADS, the menopausal symptoms were significantly high among female with high anxiety scores. Regarding the relationship between MRS and FSFI, women with anxiety and physical and mental exhaustion had significantly lower FSFI scores than women without such symptoms (19.2 [2–31.4] vs 21.7 [3.8–30.9], p = 0.04, respectively). Furthermore, there were statistically significant negative correlations between depression scores and sexual desire (r = −0.32, p < 0.001), arousal (r = −0.25, p = 0.003), and total FSFI scores (r = −0.27, p = 0.04).

Conclusion

Perimenopausal women experience a confluence of challenges related to depression, anxiety, and sexual dysfunction. Understanding the interconnectedness of hormonal and psychosocial factors is essential for tailored interventions aimed at improving mental health and sexual well-being during this transitional phase.

Keywords: anxiety, depression, perimenopausal, sexual dysfunction

Introduction

Menopause is a natural phenomenon defined as a permanent menstrual cessation for 12 months due to a stoppage of follicular activity and a decrease in ovarian hormone release.1

Perimenopause is the transitional phase preceding menopause, which is a complex period marked by hormonal fluctuations that can have profound effects on women’s mental health and sexual well-being. Multiple researches underscore the significant prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms during this phase. Hormonal shifts, particularly fluctuations in estrogen levels, have been implicated in the increased vulnerability to mood disorders among perimenopausal women.2,3 Menopause developed various symptoms, such as hot flashes, insomnia, and numbness in extremities. The intricate interplay of biological and psychosocial factors makes perimenopause a critical period for understanding and addressing mental health concerns.

Sexual life is an important part of human life as it can affect the quality of life and the emotional status of both partners. Female sexual dysfunction is considered an obvious problem; however, most women deny its presence under the pressure of traditional culture.4

Normal sexual function relies on normal mental and emotional health. Moreover, depression, “which is a common disease that attacks old people universally” affects sexual satisfaction.5

Depression is determined using the loss of interest, energy, self-esteem, and inability to experience pleasure. Long-lasting depression is associated with sexual dysfunction.6

Forty-five percent of women who are referred to menopause clinics are clinically depressed, and 80% of them have had clinical depression in the past. Additionally, it seems that menopausal symptoms occur more when women are more vulnerable to severe symptoms of depression and when sexual function is impaired. Different studies reported that sexual function is directly related to depression and hormonal status, and people with sexual dysfunction usually have anxiety disorders.7

Female sexual dysfunction may be considered a culprit of the divorce rate increase, domestic violence, and serious disturbance in both partner relationships which deeply affect family and social stability.8

Menopausal symptoms such as hot flashes, sleep disturbances, anxiety, depression, and sexual dysfunction can significantly impact a woman’s quality of life. In addition, social and economic factors can influence the experience and management of menopausal symptoms, yet there is limited research focusing on these aspects within the Egyptian context. By identifying the specific needs and challenges faced by perimenopausal women in this region, research can inform health policy and practice to ensure that women receive comprehensive and compassionate care. Therefore, the present study aims to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive analysis of menopausal symptoms, anxiety, depression, and sexual function among perimenopausal women attending outpatient clinics at Zagazig University Hospitals.

Materials and Methods

Study Setting, Design, and Sampling

This is a cross-sectional study conducted from December 2022 till August 2023 in Zagazig University Obstetrics/Gynecology and Psychiatry outpatient clinics.

Our inclusion criteria included any woman between the ages of 45 and 55 years, married, sexually active and agrees to participate. All social classes and educational levels were included. Pregnant or lactating women; women with uncontrolled medical conditions such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or heart disease; women with a history of psychiatric illness; women who were undergoing treatment for cancer or were in remission or on hormone replacement therapy; women with a history of hysterectomy or ovarian resection were excluded from the study.

The sample size was calculated using open epi according to the following total number of perimenopausal female coming to ZUH outpatient clinic in 6 months expected to be 300 cases and prevalence of sexual dysfunction in perimenopausal female was 78.2%,9 so at 95% confidence interval the sample size calculated to be 141 females, 20% of total sample were added to overcome drop out so total sample was 169 females. After exclusion of incomplete responded questionnaires, 149 females were included in the statistical analysis.

Assessment Measures

All participants recruited in the study were subjected to the following in a single face-to-face setting:

  • A semi-structured questionnaire to obtain socio-demographic data and clinical history.

  • Assessment of menopause symptoms using a validated Arabic version of the modified Menopause Rating Scale (MRS).10 The modified MRS is composed of eleven items and is divided into three subscales: Somatic scale (hot flashes, heart discomfort/palpitation, sleeping problems and muscle and joint problems), psychological scale (depressive mood, irritability, anxiety, and physical and mental exhaustion) and urogenital scale (sexual problems, bladder problems and dryness of the vagina). Females asked whether they had experienced the 11 menopausal symptoms or not.

  • Anxiety and depressive symptoms were assessed using a validated Arabic version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).11 HADS was originally developed to screen for anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D) in the general population and in hospital settings.12 It included 14 items: seven items assessing depression and seven items assessing anxiety. Responses are rated on a 4-point Likert type (0–3). Each subscale has a maximum score of 21. Normal scores lie between 0 and 7, borderline case has a score between 8 and 10, and scores between 11 and 21 mean positive case of anxiety or depression.13

  • Assessment of female sexual function using the validated Arabic version of the Female Sexual Functioning Index (FSFI),14 which was developed by Rosen et al.15 The FSFI comprises 19 items in six domains: sexual desire (two items), sexual arousal (four items), vaginal lubrication (four items), orgasm (three items), satisfaction (three items) and pain during intercourse (three items). Items 1 and 2 (both related to sexual desire) are measured on a 5-point scale ranging from 1 (nearly or very low) to 5 (always or very high). The other seventeen items are measured on a 6-point scale where zero indicates no sexual activity, 1 indicates “rarely”, and 5 indicates always. Each domain score is multiplied by the weighted value of each factor, and the resultant products are summed to arrive at the total sexual function score. The total score ranges from 2 to 36, with higher scores indicating better perceived sexual function.15

Ethical Consideration

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Zagazig Faculty of Medicine (ID: 10188 l7-12-2022) and Zagazig University Hospitals Administration. Informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from all participants after explaining the study objectives, measures, and assuring confidentiality. All experiments were conducted according to the relevant guidelines and regulations, and the participants were not exposed to any harm or unintended effects. The study adhered to the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Statistical Analysis

The collected data were computerized and statistically analyzed using SPSS program (Statistical Package for Social Science) version 27.0 (IBM, 2020) Qualitative data were represented as frequencies and relative percentages. Quantitative data were expressed as mean ± Standard deviation, median and range. Chi square test, Independent t-test, Mann Whitney test, Pearson’s and Spearman correlation coefficient were used according to type of data. P value of <0.05 indicates significant results and of <0.001 indicates highly significant results.

Results

Our study was conducted on 149 females with age ranged from 45 to 55 years with mean 49.28 ± 3.51 years. Husbands’ ages ranged from 44 to 73 years with mean 54.88 ± 5.71 years. Marriage duration ranged from 8 to 42 years with mean 26.18 ± 6.18 years. Almost half of the females were from urban resident (50.3%) and two-thirds of them had middle education and not working. Also, two-thirds of husbands had middle education and about 80% of them were working. Almost half of the studied females were of moderate social class (Table 1).

Table 1.

Demographic Data and History of the Studied Females

Variable (n=149)
Age: (years) Mean ± SD 49.28±3.51
Range 45–55
Husband age: (years) Mean ± SD 54.88±5.71
Range 44–73
Duration of marriage: (years) Mean ± SD 26.18±6.18
Range 8–42
Variable No %
Residence: Rural 74 49.7
Urban 75 50.3
Education: Illiterate 8 5.4
Read & write 11 7.4
Middle 102 68.5
College 23 15.4
Post college 5 3.4
Occupation: Not working 97 65.1
Working 52 34.9
Husband education: Illiterate 11 7.4
Read & write 8 5.4
Middle 96 64.4
College 33 22.1
Post college 1 0.7
Husband occupation: Not working 31 20.8
Working 118 79.2
Financial problems: Yes 83 55.7
No 66 44.3
Social class: Low 48 32.2
Middle 72 48.3
High 29 19.5
Comorbidity: No 76 51
Yes 73 49
Diabetes mellitus 28 18.8
Hypertension 27 18.1
Cardiac 10 6.7
Osteoporosis 8 5.4
Cancer 5 3.4
Thyroid 4 2.7
BA & Allergic Rh 2 1.3
Hepatic 2 1.3
Rheumatology 1 0.7
Thrombosis 1 0.7
Psychological 1 0.7
Husband comorbidity: No 97 65.1
Yes 52 34.9
Diabetes mellitus 30 20.1
Hypertension 21 14.1
Cardiac 8 5.4
Chest 3 2
Hepatic 3 2
Osteoporosis 2 1.3
Thrombosis 1 0.7
Psychological 1 0.7
Neurological 1 0.7
GIT 1 0.7
Menses: Regular 59 39.6
Irregular 38 25.5
Stopped 52 34.9
Menopause duration: (n=52)
Mean ± SD 4.58±3.29
Median (Range) 4 (0.17–15)

Abbreviations: SD, Standard deviation; BA, Bronchial asthma; Rh, Rhinitis; GIT, Gastrointestinal tract.

Table 1 revealed medical and menses history of the studied female. Half of them had comorbidities, and most frequent were diabetes mellitus and hypertension. In about one-third of them, menses had stopped (median for 4 years) and was irregular in about one-quarter of them. Regarding husbands, 34.9% had comorbidity, and most frequent were also diabetes mellitus and hypertension.

According to MFS, most frequent menopausal symptoms among the studied females were joint and muscular discomfort, anxiety, irritability, and physical and mental exhaustion (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Modified Menopause Rating scale among the studied females.

In Table 2, results of HADS score were found to be as follows: mean anxiety score was 11.68 ± 3.75 with range from 4 to 19 and mean depression score was 8.75 ± 3 with range from 1 to 17. According to the scale, 61.7% of the cases had anxiety, and 26.8% had depression (Figure 2).

Table 2.

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Female Sexual Functioning Index Scores Among the Studied Females

Variable (n=149)
HADS-A: (anxiety) Mean ± SD 11.68±3.75
Range 4–19
HADS-D: (depression) Mean ± SD 8.75±3
Range 1–17
Sexual desire: Mean ± SD 2.66±1.07
Median (Range) 2.4 (1.2–5.4)
Arousal: Mean ± SD 2.43±1.59
Median (Range) 2.7 (0–5.7)
Lubrication: Mean ± SD 2.67±1.84
Median (Range) 3.3 (0–6)
Orgasm: Mean ± SD 2.59±1.81
Median (Range) 3.2 (0–6)
Satisfaction: Mean ± SD 3.30±1.70
Median (Range) 3.6 (0.8–6)
Pain: Mean ± SD 2.97±1.78
Median (Range) 3.2 (0–6)
Total FSFI: Mean ± SD 16.62±7.77
Median (Range) 19.4 (2–31.4)

Abbreviations: SD, Standard deviation; HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; FSFI, Female Sexual Functioning Index.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Frequency of depression and anxiety according to Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Hads) among the studied females.

Female Sexual Function Index results were revealed in Table 2. The median of sexual desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain scores were 2.4, 2.7, 3.3, 3.2, 3.6 and 3.2, respectively. The total FSFI ranged from 2 to 31.4 with a median of 19.4.

On studying the relation between modified MRS and HADS among the studied females, it was found that the frequency of hot flashes, sleep problems, heart discomfort, sexual problems, anxiety, irritability, depressed mood, and physical and mental exhaustion were significantly increased among female with abnormal anxiety score. Also, the frequency of sleep problems and physical and mental exhaustion were significantly decreased among females with normal depression and anxiety scores, while irritability and depressed mood were significantly increased among females with abnormal depression scores (Table 3).

Table 3.

Relation Between Modified Menopause Rating Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Among the Studied Females

Anxiety P Depression P
Normal Borderline Abnormal Normal Borderline Abnormal
N % N % N % N % N % N %
Hot flashes: No 15 28.3 13 24.5 25 47.2 0.003* 16 30.2 24 45.3 13 24.5 0.49
Yes 8 8.3 21 21.9 67 69.8 35 36.5 34 35.4 27 28.1
Sleep problems No 12 35.3 7 20.6 15 44.1 0.001* 18 52.9 9 26.5 7 20.6 0.03*
Yes 11 9.6 27 23.5 77 67 33 28.7 49 42.6 33 28.7
Bladder problems No 14 21.5 17 26.2 34 52.3 0.08 21 32.3 24 36.9 20 30.8 0.64
Yes 9 10.7 17 20.2 58 69 30 35.7 34 40.5 20 23.8
Heart discomfort No 17 23.6 18 25 37 51.4 0.01* 28 38.9 25 34.7 19 26.4 0.47
Yes 6 7.8 16 20.8 55 71.4 23 29.9 33 42.9 21 27.3
Vaginal dryness No 17 17.9 24 25.3 54 56.8 0.26 26 27.4 43 45.3 26 27.4 0.06
Yes 6 11.1 10 18.5 38 70.4 25 46.3 15 27.8 14 25.9
Sexual problems No 17 27.4 16 25.8 29 46.8 0.001* 24 38.7 25 40.3 13 21 0.36
Yes 6 6.9 18 20.7 63 72.4 27 31 33 37.9 27 31
Joint & muscular discomfort No 2 20 2 20 6 60 0.91 2 20 7 70 1 10 0.11
Yes 21 15.1 32 23 86 61.9 49 35.3 51 36.7 39 28.1
Anxiety No 9 50 6 33.3 3 16.7 <0.001** 13 72.2 5 27.8 0 0 0.001*
Yes 14 10.7 28 21.4 89 67.9 38 29 53 40.5 40 30.5
Irritability No 9 39.1 7 30.4 7 30.4 0.001* 15 65.2 7 30.4 1 4.3 0.001*
Yes 14 11.1 27 21.4 85 67.5 36 28.6 51 40.5 39 31
Depressed mood No 16 34.8 15 32.6 15 32.6 <0.001** 25 54.3 13 28.3 8 17.4 0.002*
Yes 7 6.8 19 18.4 77 74.8 26 25.2 45 43.7 32 31.1
Physical & mental exhaustion No 9 31 10 34.5 10 34.5 0.002* 17 58.6 6 20.7 6 20.7 0.007*
Yes 14 11.7 24 20 82 68.3 34 28.3 52 43.3 34 28.3

Note: P, Chi square test; *Significant (P<0.05); **Highly significant (P<0.001).

Table 4 revealed the relation between modified MRS and FSFI. Females with sexual problems, anxiety and physical and mental exhaustion had significantly lower score of FSFI compared to females without.

Table 4.

Relation Between Modified Menopause Rating Scale and Female Sexual Functioning Index Among the Studied Females

N Female Sexual Functioning Index P$
Median Range
Hot flashes: No 53 17.5 2–34.1 0.94
Yes 96 19.45 2–26.9
Sleep problems No 34 20.4 2–34.1 0.10
Yes 115 19.1 2–28.6
Bladder problems No 65 21 2–30.9 0.17
Yes 84 19.25 2–31.4
Heart discomfort No 72 19.2 2–31.4 0.80
Yes 77 19.4 2–28.6
Vaginal dryness No 95 19.9 2–31.4 0.09
Yes 54 18.2 2–24.3
Sexual problems No 62 21.45 2–31.4 0.001*
Yes 87 16.8 2–25.2
Joint & muscular discomfort No 10 21.4 2–28.5 0.69
Yes 139 19.4 2–31.4
Anxiety No 18 23 2–31.4 0.01*
Yes 131 19.1 2–28.6
Irritability No 23 22 2–31.4 0.07
Yes 126 19.4 2–28.6
Depressed mood No 46 19.5 2.3–31.4 0.10
Yes 103 19.4 2–28.6
Physical & mental exhaustion No 29 21.7 3.8–30.9 0.04*
Yes 120 19.2 2–31.4

Note: $Mann Whitney test; *Significant (P<0.05).

In Table 5 results of correlation between HADS & FSFI among the studied females. There was a statistically significant negative correlation between depression score and sexual desire, arousal and total FSFI scores.

Table 5.

Correlation Between Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Female Sexual Functioning Index Among the Studied Females

Variable Anxiety Score (n=149) Depression Score (n=149)
r P r P
Desire −0.12 0.15 −0.32 <0.001**
Arousal −0.03 0.74 −0.25 0.003*
Lubrication −0.03 0.70 −0.09 0.28
Orgasm −0.07 0.43 −0.13 0.13
Satisfaction −0.11 0.20 −0.08 0.37
Pain −0.03 0.71 −0.02 0.83
Total FSFI −0.02 0.85 −0.27 0.04*

Note: *Significant (P<0.05); **Highly significant (P<0.001).

Abbreviations: FSFI, Female Sexual Functioning Index; r, Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

Comparison between menopausal and non-menopausal female showed that in modified MRS scale, there was a statistically significant increase in joint and muscular discomfort among menopausal compared to non-menopausal females. In FSFI, there was a statistically significant decrease in sexual desire, arousal, orgasm and total FSFI score among menopausal compared to non-menopausal females (Table 6).

Table 6.

Relation Between Menopause and Different Scores Among the Studied Females

Variable Not menopausal (n=97) Menopausal (n=52) P
N % N %
MRS Hot flashes: No 36 67.9 17 32.1 0.56 ^
Yes 91 63.5 35 36.5
Sleep problems No 23 67.6 11 32.4 0.72 ^
Yes 74 64.3 41 35.7
Bladder problems No 44 67.7 21 32.3 0.56 ^
Yes 53 63.1 31 36.9
Heart discomfort No 48 66.7 24 33.3 0.70 ^
Yes 49 63.3 28 36.4
Vaginal dryness No 65 68.4 30 31.6 0.26^
Yes 32 59.3 22 40.7
Sexual problems No 43 69.4 19 30.6 0.36^
Yes 54 62.1 33 37.9
Joint & muscular discomfort No 10 100 0 0 0.02*^
Yes 87 62.6 52 37.4
Anxiety No 13 72.2 5 27.8 0.50^
Yes 84 64.1 47 35.9
Irritability No 15 65.2 8 34.8 0.99^
Yes 82 65.1 44 34.9
Depressed mood No 27 58.7 19 41.3 0.27^
Yes 70 68 33 32
Physical & mental exhaustion No 22 75.9 7 24.1 0.18^
Yes 75 62.5 4545 37.5
HADS Anxiety: Normal 12 52.2 11 47.8 0.33^
Borderline 24 70.6 10 29.4
Abnormal 61 66.3 31 33.7
Depression: Normal 36 70.6 15 29.4 0.56^
Borderline 37 63.8 21 36.2
Abnormal 24 60 16 40
HADS-A: (anxiety) Mean ± Sd 11.88±3.61 11.31±4.03 0.38#
HADS-D: (depression) Mean ± Sd 8.51±2.87 9.21±3.22 0.71#
FSFI Desire: Median (Range) 3 (1.2–5.4) 2.4 (1.2–4.8) 0.002*$
Arousal: Median (Range) 3 (0–5.7) 1.95 (0–4.2) <0.001**$
Lubrication: Median (Range) 3.6 (0–6) 2.7 (0–5.4) 0.08$
Orgasm: Median (Range) 3.2 (0–6) 2.8 (0–6) 0.02*$
Satisfaction: Median (Range) 3.6 (0.8–6) 3.2 (0.8–6) 0.41$
Pain: Median (Range) 3.6 (0–6) 3.2 (0–6) 0.32$
Total FSFI: Median (Range) 20.5 (2–31.4) 15.8 (2–27) 0.006*$

Note: ^Chi square test; #Independent t-test; $Mann Whitney test; *Significant (P<0.05); **Highly significant (P<0.001).

Abbreviations: MRS, Menopause Rating Scale; FSFI, Female Sexual Functioning Index; HADS, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; SD, Standard deviation.

Table 7 revealed correlation between HADS & FSFI and demographic data of the studied females. Anxiety scores had a statistically significant negative correlation with husband education and social class. Depression scores had a statistically significant positive correlation with comorbidity in both females and husbands. Female Sexual Function Index had a statistically significant negative correlation with female’s age, husband’s age, and duration of marriage.

Table 7.

Correlation Between Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Female Sexual Functioning Index and Demographic Data of the Studied Females

Variable Anxiety Score (n=149) Depression Score (n=149) Total FSFI (n=149)
r P r P r P
Age 0.09 0.30 −0.09 0.29 −0.21 0.009*
Age of husband 0.04 0.66 −0.14 0.10 −0.16 0.04*
Duration of marriage 0.07 0.40 0.11 0.19 −0.19 0.02*
Residence 0.07 0.41 0.12 0.06 0.01 0.99
Education −0.08 0.33 −0.05 0.58 0.02 0.86
Occupation −0.03 0.74 0.15 0.06 −0.13 0.12
Husband education −0.19 0.02* 0.14 0.10 −0.03 0.75
Husband occupation 0.11 0.20 −0.07 0.40 0.10 0.21
Social class −0.17 0.04* −0.05 0.55 0.01 0.88
Comorbidity 0.10 0.24 0.29 <0.001** −0.04 0.64
Husband comorbidity 0.07 0.38 0.24 0.004* −0.13 0.12
Menses duration −0.02 0.90 0.02 0.88 0.001 0.99

Note: *Significant (P<0.05); **Highly significant (P<0.001).

Abbreviations: FSFI, Female Sexual Functioning Index; r, Spearman correlation coefficient.

Discussion

Perimenopause is a process involving sex hormone fluctuations and ovarian dysfunction. This stage is accompanied by symptoms of menopause, increased risk of various chronic diseases, and decline in reproductive function,16,17 causing varying degrees of negative changes to women’s physiological, psychological, and social relations. In addition to physical discomfort, another often-overlooked effect of perimenopause in women is female sexual dysfunction (FSD), perhaps via estrogen fluctuations affecting certain brain mediators such as serotonin and gamma amino butyric acid.18 A previous study showed that the incidence of FSD in perimenopausal women was as high as over 60%,19 which not only impacts mental health but also interferes with family harmony and stability.

Our results reflected the typical perimenopausal age range. The majority had middle-level education, which might influence their awareness and understanding of menopausal symptoms. The fact that about half of the women were from urban areas and nearly half were of moderate social class could influence access to health care resources and support networks, potentially affecting the management of menopausal symptoms. Considering the husbands’ ages, education, and employment status is crucial for understanding the overall household dynamics and potential support systems available to these women during the perimenopausal phase. The high prevalence of comorbidities, particularly diabetes mellitus and hypertension, among both women and their husbands, suggests the need for a holistic approach to health care for these couples.

On studying the relation between modified MRS and HADS among the studied females, it was found that the frequency of menopausal symptoms was significantly increased among females with abnormal anxiety scores. Also, the frequency of sleep problems and physical and mental exhaustion was significantly decreased among females with normal depression scores and the frequency of anxiety, irritability and depressed mood was significantly increased among females with abnormal depression scores, these results match with a study done by Shariat Moghani et al20 and Malaijerdi et al21 as they mentioned that the higher the anxiety, the higher the menopausal symptoms. Moreover, some other researchers have also reported that high levels of stress and anxiety potentially exacerbate menopausal symptoms.22–24

Erbil25 study conducted in 2018 showed that women who have an optimistic attitude towards menopause have a more positive body image and their level of depression is lower.

On the other hand, the study of Bahri et al26 showed that there is no relationship between the severity of menopausal symptoms and depression and anxiety in menopausal women.

Regarding the relation between modified MRS and FSFI. Females with sexual problems, anxiety and physical and mental exhaustion had significantly lower scores of FSFI compared to females without such symptoms. These findings are in same line with Thornton et al27 and Prairie et al28 who found that sexual function components may be affected by menopause due to changes in sensory perception, central and peripheral nerves, peripheral blood flow, and the capacity to create muscle tension in response to estrogen deficiency. These changes may lead to lower self-esteem, weaker body image, and reduced sexual desire. Some women feel less sexually attractive or less satisfied with their bodies. In fact, their self-image can change because they tend to gain weight as their metabolism slows down. Thus, depression and emotional distress, in turn, can be a risk factor for sexual dysfunction, and it can be imagined as a mutual relationship between emotional state and sexual function.

Our study revealed that there is a statistically significant negative correlation between depression scores and sexual desire, arousal and total FSFI scores. As reported by a study from Malaijerdi et al21 who showed that health anxiety has a significant relationship with the dimensions of desire (p = 0.045 and r = −0.142) and sexual pain (p < 0.001 and r = 0.274).

In justification of the results, it can be said that people who experience depression tend to be less engaged in sexual activities, and if they do, they experience higher sexual pain, which itself can cause a decrease in relationship satisfaction, not to mention that mental health problems are frequently associated with sexual dysfunction such as decreased libido, poor orgasm and less satisfaction.29 The reverse is also true that sexual dysfunction can lead to depression.30

There was also a significant relationship between the attitude towards menopause with sexual performance (p < 0.001 and r = 0.244). Also, the study of Yazdanpanahi et al6 showed that there is a relationship between mental health status and sexual performance in postmenopausal women.

The study has several strengths, including the use of validated Arabic versions of well-established assessment tools such as MRS, HADS, and FSFI, which ensured reliable and culturally relevant evaluation of menopausal symptoms, anxiety, depression, and sexual function. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were clearly defined and systematically excluded participants with conditions that could confound results, such as those with a history of psychiatric illness. Sample size calculation was robust, with adjustments for potential attrition resulting in a final sample size adequate for statistical analysis. In addition, all assessments were conducted in a single face-to-face setting, reducing variability and potential bias, and the study used a variety of appropriate statistical tests, increasing the robustness and validity of the findings.

However, the study has several limitations. The cross-sectional design limits the ability to draw causal inferences, and the single-center setting at Zagazig University Hospitals may limit the generalizability of the findings to other settings or populations. The reliance on self-reported data introduces potential recall bias, which affects the accuracy of the information collected. The exclusion of pregnant and lactating women, women on hormone replacement therapy, and women with a history of hysterectomy or oophorectomy, while necessary for the focus of the study, may limit the applicability of the results to all perimenopausal women. In addition, the high prevalence of comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension among participants and their husbands may influence the outcomes related to anxiety, depression, and sexual function, potentially confounding the study results. Finally, social desirability bias might have influenced participant responses. Participants may have been hesitant to report negative sexual experiences or symptoms due to social stigma surrounding these topics.

Recommendations

To improve the quality of life for perimenopausal women, health care providers should employ an integrated approach that addresses both physical and mental health needs, including routine screening for anxiety, depression, and sexual dysfunction. Awareness programs are essential to help women and their families understand and manage the changes associated with menopause. Mental health support should be readily available, with integration between mental health and gynecology professionals. Sexual health awareness, counseling, and interventions, including appropriate medical treatment, should be prioritized.

Future research should employ longitudinal designs and consider more diverse populations to further elucidate these relationships, understand causal relationships, and inform targeted interventions. Tailored interventions based on demographic factors, support networks, group therapy, and advocacy for adequate resources and reduced stigma are also essential for comprehensive care. Implementation of these recommendations may lead to improved health outcomes and enhanced support for perimenopausal women.

Conclusion

Perimenopausal symptoms significantly affect women’s mental health and sexual function, with a high prevalence of anxiety and depression observed among participants. There is a noticeable negative correlation between depression and various aspects of sexual function, highlighting the interrelationship between mental health and sexual well-being. The high prevalence of comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension among participants and their husbands indicates the need for a holistic health care approach that addresses both physical and mental health to improve overall quality of life during menopause. Our findings highlight the need for comprehensive health care strategies that integrate psychological and physiological care to better support women through the perimenopausal transition.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to all the participant for their cooperation and grateful to Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Researchers supporting project number (PNURSP2024R347), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding Statement

The authors declare that financial support was sponsored by Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Researchers supporting project number (PNURSP2024R347), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • 1.Ling J, Wang YH. Association between depressive mood and body image and menopausal symptoms and sexual function in perimenopausal women. World J Clin Cases. 2023;11(32):7761–7769. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i32.7761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bromberger JT, Schott LL, Kravitz HM, et al. Longitudinal change in reproductive hormones and depressive symptoms across the menopausal transition: results from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67(6):598–607. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.55 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Khanna A, John F, Das S, et al. Efficacy of a novel extract of fenugreek seeds in alleviating vasomotor symptoms and depression in perimenopausal women: a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. J Food Biochem. 2020;44:e13507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Zhuo Z, Wang C, Yu H, et al. The relationship between pelvic floor function and sexual function in perimenopausal women. Sex Med. 2021;9(6):100441. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100441 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mat Din H, Nor Akahbar SA, Ibrahim R. The association between depression and sexual satisfaction among Malay elderly in Malaysia. Heliyon. 2019;5:e01940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yazdanpanahi Z, Nikkholgh M, Akbarzadeh M, et al. Stress, anxiety, depression, and sexual dysfunction among postmenopausal women in Shiraz, Iran, 2015. J Family Community Med. 2018;25(2):82–87. doi: 10.4103/jfcm.JFCM_117_17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Santoro N. Perimenopause: from Research to Practice. J Women's Health. 2016;25(4):332–339. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5556 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bahrami Vazir E, Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi S, Kamalifard M, et al. The correlation between sexual dysfunction and intimate partner violence in young women during pregnancy. BMC Int Health Hum Rights. 2020;20(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12914-020-00245-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lo SS, Kok WM. Sexuality of Chinese women around menopause. Maturitas. 2013;74(2):190–195. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sweed HS, Elawam AE, Nabeel AM, et al. Postmenopausal symptoms among Egyptian geripausal women. East Mediterr Health J. 2012;18(3):213–220. doi: 10.26719/2012.18.3.213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Terkawi AS, Tsang S, AlKahtani GJ, et al. Development and validation of Arabic version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Saudi J Anaesth. 2017;11:S11–S18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, et al. The validity of the hospital anxiety and depression scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52(2):69–77. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00296-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67(6):361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Anis TH, Gheit SA, Saied HS, et al. Arabic translation of female sexual function index and validation in an Egyptian population. J Sex Med. 2011;8(12):3370–3378. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02471.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther. 2000;26(2):191–208. doi: 10.1080/009262300278597 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Culbert KM, Thakkar KN, Klump KL. Risk for midlife psychosis in women: critical gaps and opportunities in exploring perimenopause and ovarian hormones as mechanisms of risk. Psychol Med. 2022;52(9):1612–1620. doi: 10.1017/S0033291722001143 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kanadys K, Wiktor-Stoma A, Lewicka M, et al. Predictors of the quality of life of women in peri-menopausal period. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2016;23(4):641–648. doi: 10.5604/12321966.1226860 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Alblooshi S, Taylor M, Gill N. Does menopause elevate the risk for developing depression and anxiety? Results from a systematic review. Australas Psychiatry. 2023;31(2):165–173. doi: 10.1177/10398562231165439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gordon JL, Halleran M, Beshai S, et al. Endocrine and psychosocial moderators of mindfulness-based stress reduction for the prevention of perimenopausal depressive symptoms: a randomized controlled trial. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2021;130:105277. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2021.105277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Shariat Moghani S, Simbar M, Rashidi Fakari F, et al. The relationship between stress, anxiety and depression with menopausal women experiences. Avicenna J Nurs Midwifery Care. 2018;26:333–340. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Malaijerdi R, Amini L, Haghani H, et al. Investigating the relationship between menopausal women’s health anxiety and sexual performance and attitude towards menopause. J Educ Health Promot. 2023;12(1):199. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_925_22 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Baksu B, Baksu A, Göker N, et al. Do different delivery systems of hormone therapy have different effects on psychological symptoms in surgically menopausal women? A randomized controlled trial. Maturitas. 2009;62(2):140–145. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.12.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Saeedi RS, Gholami MG, Dinparvar SD, et al. Short communication: transcutaneous feeding: the effect of massage with coconut oil on weight gaining in preterm newborns. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2011;13(9):666–669. doi: 10.5812/kowsar.20741804.2243 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Saeidi R, Ziadi Lotf Abadi M, Saeidi A, et al. The effectiveness of mother infant interaction on infantile colic. Iranian J Neonatol. 2014;4:34–38. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Erbil N. Attitudes towards menopause and depression, body image of women during menopause. Alexandria Journal of Medicine. 2018;54(3):241–246. doi: 10.1016/j.ajme.2017.05.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bahri N, Afiat M, Aghamohamadian H, et al. Investigating the relationship between severity of menopausal symptoms and depression, anxiety and other menopausal symptoms. Iranian J Obstet Gynecol Infertil. 2013;16:14–20. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Thornton K, Chervenak J, Neal-Perry G. Menopause and sexuality. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2015;44(3):649–661. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2015.05.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Prairie BA, Wisniewski SR, Luther J, et al. Symptoms of depressed mood, disturbed sleep, and sexual problems in midlife women: cross-sectional data from the study of women’s health across the nation. J Women's Health. 2015;24(2):119–126. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.4798 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Montejo AL, Montejo L, Baldwin DS. The impact of severe mental disorders and psychotropic medications on sexual health and its implications for clinical management. World Psychiatry. 2018;17(1):3–11. doi: 10.1002/wps.20509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Soares CN. Depression and menopause: current knowledge and clinical recommendations for a critical window. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2017;40(2):239–254. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2017.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Journal of Women's Health are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES