Table 2.
Gene ontology enrichment analysis of DEGs from wild and hatchery-produced greater amberjack ovaries.
| Category | Term | Count | FDR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DysF vs. NormalF | UP_KW_CELLULAR_COMPONENT | KW-0964~ secreted | 21 | 1.59E−04 |
| UP_KW_CELLULAR_COMPONENT | KW-0272~ extracellular matrix | 8 | 1.24E−03 | |
| UP_KW_MOLECULAR_FUNCTION | KW-0675~ receptor | 20 | 3.41E−03 | |
| KEGG_PATHWAY | sdu04512: ECM-receptor interaction | 17 | 4.60E−08 | |
| KEGG_PATHWAY | sdu04510: focal adhesion | 21 | 5.42E−05 | |
| KEGG_PATHWAY | sdu04810: regulation of actin cytoskeleton | 18 | 6.15E−03 | |
| DysF vs. WILD | UP_KW_CELLULAR_COMPONENT | KW-0964~ secreted | 29 | 8.63E−06 |
| UP_KW_CELLULAR_COMPONENT | KW-0272~ extracellular matrix | 10 | 4.65E−04 | |
| KEGG_PATHWAY | sdu04512: ECM-receptor interaction | 21 | 8.61E−09 | |
| KEGG_PATHWAY | sdu04510: focal adhesion | 31 | 1.29E−07 |
Count indicates DEGs belonging to specific category. FDR (false discovery rate) is statistically significant (P < 0.05), corrected for multiple testing within each category using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure, describing the level of significance of the enrichment. Term denomination corresponds to that provided by DAVID annotation tool. No enriched category or term were identified in NormalF vs. WILD comparison.
DysF dysfunctional farmed group, NormalF normal farmed group, WILD wild group.