Skip to main content
Microbial Cell logoLink to Microbial Cell
. 2024 Aug 2;11:288–311. doi: 10.15698/mic2024.08.833

Understanding the molecular mechanisms of human diseases: the benefits of fission yeasts

Lajos Acs-Szabo 1,, Laszlo Attila Papp 1, Ida Miklos 1,
PMCID: PMC11299203  PMID: 39104724

Abstract

The role of model organisms such as yeasts in life science research is crucial. Although the baker’s yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) is the most popular model among yeasts, the contribution of the fission yeasts (Schizosaccharomyces) to life science is also indisputable. Since both types of yeasts share several thousands of common orthologous genes with humans, they provide a simple research platform to investigate many fundamental molecular mechanisms and functions, thereby contributing to the understanding of the background of human diseases. In this review, we would like to highlight the many advantages of fission yeasts over budding yeasts. The usefulness of fission yeasts in virus research is shown as an example, presenting the most important research results related to the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Vpr protein. Besides, the potential role of fission yeasts in the study of prion biology is also discussed. Furthermore, we are keen to promote the uprising model yeast Schizosaccharomyces japonicus, which is a dimorphic species in the fission yeast genus. We propose the hyphal growth of S. japonicus as an unusual opportunity as a model to study the invadopodia of human cancer cells since the two seemingly different cell types can be compared along fundamental features. Here we also collect the latest laboratory protocols and bioinformatics tools for the fission yeasts to highlight the many possibilities available to the research community. In addition, we present several limiting factors that everyone should be aware of when working with yeast models.

Keywords: fission yeast, budding yeast, human disease, fungal hyphae, tumor invadopodia, molecular tools

INTRODUCTION

The use of model organisms to understand essential processes is a well-known strategy in life science research. If we take a look at the publication statistics in repositories like PubMed, we can see that there are a substantial number of studies using different model organisms. For example, a quick search in the aforementioned repository resulted in (accessed on 2023.10.16) 142,277 matches for the keywords ‘Saccharomyces cerevisiae’, 429,254 for ‘Escherichia coli’, 1,945,515 for ‘Mus musculus’, 92,105 for ‘Arabidopsis thaliana’, 62,541 for ‘Drosophila melanogaster’, 36,775 for ‘Caenorhabditis elegans’ just a few to mention. This leads us to conclude that the contribution of model organisms to our understanding of basic biological processes is indispensable.

The yeasts have a special place among model organisms because these tiny fungal cells have provided many useful models for different studies. For example, Candida albicans and Cryptococcus neoformans emerged as models for studying fungal pathogenesis, while S. cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe are useful models for studying the eukaryotic cell cycle and other countless fundamental biological processes. Accordingly, thousands of research articles related to these species are published every year (Fig. 1). Although S. cerevisiae is the most popular yeast model, we would like to concentrate on the fission yeasts (Schizosaccharomyces) as models in this particular review. The fission yeasts are widely established models of the eukaryotic cell cycle, cell size maintenance, cellular aging, gene expression and epigenetics, autophagy, and apoptotic processes, just a few to mention.

Figure 1 . Number of published papers at the PubMed repository from 2020 to 2023.S. cerevisiae is for the baker’s yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and C. albicans stands for the opportunistic human pathogen Candida albicans. C. neoformans represents the medically important species Cryptococcus neoformans, and S. pombe is for the fission yeast model Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Figure 1

To our best knowledge, the fission yeast genus consists of six species to date: S. japonicus, S. pombe, S. octosporus, S. cryophilus, and the recently described species S. osmophilus and S. lindneri, and other variants 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. S. japonicus has two main varieties: var. japonicus and var. versatilis, which have recently been proposed to be considered as two different lineages 7. In our opinion, the two most divergent branches of the genus (S. japonicus and S. pombe) have tremendous potential (not just) as model organisms.

FISSION YEASTS? FOR WHAT?

Someone may ask the legitimate question: why do we need fission yeasts when we already have well-established and widely used yeast models such as S. cerevisiae and C. albicans? What can fission yeasts provide that cannot be provided by the aforementioned ones? Most importantly, could a fission yeast be a good (or better) alternative for studying human diseases than budding yeasts? We try to provide answers to these questions while revealing some fundamental differences among the yeast models (Table 1).

Table 1. Fundamental differences of yeast models.

Genome stats/

Biological features

C. albicans

S. cerevisiae

S. pombe

S. japonicus

Genome size (Mb)

~ 14.28

(SC5314)

~ 12.24

(S288c)

~ 12.59

(L972)

~ 16.6-18.12 (ATCC10660)

Chromosome number

(haploid set)

8

16

3

3

Chromosome sizes (Mb)

0.95-3.19

0.23-1.55

3.5-5.7

~ 3.8-5.75

Coding gene number

6030

5850

5134

4942

Common orthologues with humans

~ 3400

~ 3427

~ 3422

~ 3316

Disease-associated transcripts

YTBD*

~ 1000

1521

YTBD*

Genetic code

CTG

Standard

Standard

Standard

Whole Genome Duplication

pre

post

pre

pre

Preferred chromosomal state

2n

2n

1n

1n

Centromere sizes

3-4.5 kb

125 bp

35-110 kb

610-738 kb

Centromere type

Unique DNA sequence, without repetitive elements

Small, point-like

Large, repetitive sequences

Large, repetitive sequences and transposons

RNAi components

Yes

No

Yes

Yes

RNAi-mediated splicing

No

No

Yes

Yes

Percent proportion of introns

4-6%

2-6%

>50%

>50%

Spliceosome components

Yes

Reduced

Yes

Yes

Alternative splicing

Obscure

Obscure

Frequent

YTBD*

Generation time (hours)

1.7-3.6

1.25-2.0

2.0-3.0

1.0-1.5

Working time of genetic cross (days)

Not applicable

7

4

2.5

Pathogenicity

Yes

Can be

No known cases

No known cases

Hyphae production

Yes

Pseudo

No**

Yes

Cell division

Budding

Budding

Fission

Fission

Mitosis

Closed

Closed

Closed

Semi-open

DNA methylation

Yes

No

No

YTBD*

H3K9 methylation

No

No

Yes

Yes

‘Genome size’ ref.: 8, 9. ‘Chromosome number’ ref.: 10, 11, 12, 13. ‘Chromosome sizes’ ref.: 9, 11, 12, 13. ‘Coding gene number’ ref.:8, 14, 15. ‘Common orthologues with humans’ ref.: 14, 15, 16. ‘Disease associated transcripts’ ref.: 17, 14. ‘Genetic code’ ref.: 18. ‘Whole Genome Duplication’ ref.: 19. ‘Preferred chromosomal state’ ref.: 10, 20, 21, 22. ‘Centromere sizes’ and ‘Centromere type’ ref.: 23, 9, 24, 25. ‘RNAi components’ and ‘RNAi mediated silencing’ ref.: 10, 26, 27. ‘Percent proportion of introns’ and ‘Spliceosome components’ and ‘Alternative splicing’ ref.: 10, 28, 29, 30, 31. ‘Generation time’ ref.: 20, 32, 33, 34. ‘Working time of genetic cross’ ref.: 32, 35. ‘Pathogenicity’ ref.: 36, 37. ‘Mitosis’ ref.: 38, 39. ‘DNA methylation’ ref.: 40, 41, 42. ‘H3K9 methylation’ ref.: 10, 26, 43. * YTBD – Yet to be determined. ** Under standard circumstances, S. pombe does not form hyphae.

Fundamental considerations

At first, we should take a close look at the phylogenies of the fission yeasts. Since they are a basal lineage of the Ascomycota (subdivision Taphrinomycotina), they have a closer phylogenetic relationship with the Metazoa lineage 44, 45, 10, 46, 47. Besides, the fission yeast genus has remarkably conserved common gene content, which is maintained through a relatively long divergence time 10, 48, 49. Maybe that is one of the reasons for them to preserve many common features with the higher eukaryotes. The fission yeasts are already considered “micro-mammalian” model organisms since they share various fundamental features with the metazoan species, such as chromosomal structure and metabolism, relatively large chromosomes and centromeres, low-complexity replication origins, epigenetic mechanisms for regulation of gene expression and centromere maintenance, G2/M control of cell cycle, cytokinesis, mitosis and meiosis, DNA repair and recombination, the mitochondrial translation code, spliceosome components with functional alternative splicing, post-translational modifications, and RNA interference (RNAi) 10, 11, 50, 51, 52, 53.

Chromosomes, centromeres and heterochromatin

The haplontic chromosomal state facilitates genetic modifications and makes the phenotypic association of the mutation more comprehensible. Although both S. cerevisiae and S. pombe are able to maintain haplontic and diplontic chromosomal states as well, in contrast to S. cerevisiae, the fission yeasts preferred the haplontic state. While it seems to be a tendency that the lab strains of S. cerevisiae drive towards diploidization after a few generations, the fission yeasts naturally maintain their haplontic form even in the wild 53, 20, 54, 21, 55, 56, 57. Despite possessing similar genome sizes, S. cerevisiae has many small chromosomes with short (125 bp) point-like centromeres, while the fission yeasts have few but long chromosomes with large centromeres containing repetitive sequences that are more similar to mammalian centromeres 23, 58. Nevertheless, the larger chromosome sizes allow for more efficient microscopic examination. Moreover, the fission yeast genome contains regions of centromeric heterochromatin, which is maintained by H3K9 methylation of nucleosomes and RNAi, unlike the budding yeasts that do not have the necessary molecular toolkit for either one 10, 58, 59, 26, 60. Although both S. pombe and S. cerevisiae have silent chromatin at telomeres, at the mating-type loci, and rDNA regions, only S. pombe has silent chromatin at centromeres 61, 40. In humans, the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) is a key enzyme in the folate metabolic pathway, loss of function mutations of which are associated with several human conditions, such as cancer, congenital heart disease, and maybe Down and Turner syndrome, too 62, 63, 64, 65, 66. Lim and co-workers examined the fission yeast equivalent of MTHFR, the Met11, and they revealed that it functions to maintain centromeric integrity to ensure precise chromosome segregation in mitosis and meiosis, as the Δmet11 null mutant showed increased missegregation of chromosomes in mitosis and increased transcription from centromeric heterochromatic regions 67. They also observed heterochromatic derepression at subtelomeric and rDNA regions, accompanied by a disruption of H3K9me2 and HP1 protein (Swi6) at all these loci 67. The human nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase (NuRD) complexes sustain specific gene expression programs required for lineage specification, so they have an important role in development and aging 68, 69. In many cases of cancer, the subunits of the NuRD complex contain mutations 70 and some of the mutations can also have detrimental effects on neurological and cognitive development 71. To understand the fundamental function and operation of this heterogenic complex, examination of the fission yeast counterpart Snf2/Hdac Repressive Complex (SHREC) and its interacting partners can be a good alternative 72, 73, 74, 75. Wei and co-workers studied the TOR signaling pathway, and they showed that this cascade targets a conserved nuclear RNA elimination network to dynamically control gene expression by promoting RNA decay and facultative heterochromatin assembly 76. Since RNA elimination factors are involved in proper meiotic progression during oogenesis and/or spermatogenesis in mammals, their result may shed light on the epigenetic reprogramming during development 76, 77, 78, 79. Thus, the fission yeasts proved to be a very powerful model for the investigation of heterochromatin assembly and epigenetic gene silencing 53. Surprisingly, unlike higher eukaryotes, and many other fungal species, neither S. pombe nor S. cerevisiae have DNA methylation processes 40, 41. However, the heterologous expression of a murine DNA methyltransferase in S. cerevisiae resulted in methylated DNA at specific sites 80.

Telomere maintenance

All eukaryotic organisms have precisely defined regions called telomeres at both ends of their chromosomes. Telomere malfunction can cause several problems, from genome rearrangements to several diseases like premature aging, dyskeratosis congenita, and cancer amongst many other diseases 81, 82. One of the protein complexes, the heterotrimeric CST complex plays a key role in the regulation of telomere extension, which can be examined in both the budding and the fission yeast systems 83. The other complex, which contains up to six different proteins, the shelterin-complex has a crucial role in the maintenance of telomeres, as it is responsible for telomere protection and telomerase regulation 83, 84, 85. Strikingly, S. pombe has a shelterin-like telomere complex, which lacks in S. cerevisiae 83, 84. Although the fission yeast shelterin-like complex has “only” three obvious protein orthologues with the vertebrates, the overall structure seems to be quite similar 83, 84, 86, 87, 88, 89. Thus, fundamental processes can be investigated in the fission yeasts also in the case of shelterin function 90, 91, 92. As an example, Irie and co-workers observed in S. pombe that simultaneous inactivation of the shelterin complex subunits Taz1 (TERF1 in humans) and Rap1 (TERF2IP in humans) enables a substantially higher number of gross chromosomal rearrangements per cell division, not just in the telomeric regions but also in the whole genome 93. This is also remarkable because extensive chromosomal rearrangements have been reported in many cancers with mutations in the human shelterin complex 81, 94.

Introns and splicing

Since the fission yeasts have thousands of introns in their genes compared to the few hundred introns of S. cerevisiae, and have degenerate splice site sequences and exonic splicing enhancers, the former species is again a better choice for investigating maturation of mRNA and misregulated splicing 53, 28. Although spliceosome components are available in fission yeasts, functional alternative splicing (AS) has been debated because of the low amount of unequivocal evidence. Montañés and co-workers provided exact proof for functional AS and they showed that it is more prevalent in S. pombe than it was previously thought 29. They have identified 332 alternative isoforms affecting 262 coding genes, 97 of which occur with frequencies >20%. The overwhelming majority of the events (~80%) were intron retention, besides intron inclusion, the use of alternative splicing sites, and exon skipping. According to Zheng and co-workers, the phenomenon of intron retention is one of the least understood forms of alternative splicing in the human genome, even though it can be associated with serious diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease and cancer 95.

Protein interactions

Thanks to modern sequencing techniques, we were able to identify thousands of mutations associated with diseases and disorders in humans. However, it is still a serious problem to filter out the noise and find the true causes of the observed phenotypes. Moreover, the International Rare Disease Research Consortium (IRDiRC) also acknowledged that different model organisms are an effective experimental system for investigating the impact of gene variants on protein activity, determining their biological function, and identifying potential therapies 96. Thus, yeasts as a system seem to be good candidates for this task too 97, 98, 99. To establish binary protein-protein interactions (PPI) and to find out which mutation causes loss of function or reduced functionality, the yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) system is a well-established method 100, 101, 102. For example, a SARS-CoV2 – human protein interactome was examined in a recent study with the combined usage of Y2H and mass spectrometry 103. Yeasts can also be used for heterologous expression of other eukaryotic proteins, as well as for studying the impact of the foreign protein on the yeast transcriptome and proteome or the effect of different drugs on the proteins to be tested 104, 105, 106, 107. However, these tasks are easier when the interactome of the host is more similar to the tested one. Vo and co-workers created a proteome-wide binary interaction network for S. pombe, and they compared the result with previous data concerning the S. cerevisiae and human interactomes 108, 109, 110, 111. Interestingly, they found that only ~40% of S. pombe interactions are conserved in S. cerevisiae, but ~65% of S. pombe interactions are conserved in humans despite the overall higher sequence similarity between S. pombe and S. cerevisiae 108. Their results therefore suggest that many of the interactions between humans and S. pombe are conserved, but specifically lost in the S. cerevisiae lineage. Besides, they tested whether known disease-causing mutations that disrupt PPIs in humans also disrupt PPIs in S. pombe. Their results showed that in the three tested cases (NMNAT1-NMNAT1, PCBD1-PCBD1, and SNW1-PPIL1), the introduced mutations in the S. pombe counterparts also disrupted PPIs.

Disease-associated genes

The idea that yeast might be a useful model of human diseases has already emerged right after the completion of the sequencing of both S. cerevisiae and S. pombe 11, 12. Based on data from Heinicke et al., S. cerevisiae has approximately 1000 genes, which have orthologues in gene families associated with human diseases 17. In the case of S. pombe, we have an up-to-date and relevant information source on this topic, since the PomBase database is in connection with the Monarch Initiative 112, 113 and Mondo database 114. According to PomBase (https://www.pombase.org accessed on 2024.01.13), S. pombe has 1514 transcripts (proteins and ncRNAs) that are considered orthologues of human disease-associated transcripts 14.

THE ADVANTAGES OF FISSION YEASTS IN VIRUS RESEARCH

Viruses can cause various and often fatal diseases. Effective prevention and treatment of these diseases require extensive knowledge about the molecular mechanism of the infection and the changes caused by the viral proteins in the host cells. Various model organisms are used as hosts to reveal consequences of viral infections. The yeasts belong to these model organisms 115, because of their attractive features, such as eukaryotic cell structure, small genome, widely available molecular tools, and the ability of several eukaryotic viruses to replicate in their cells 20, 116, 117. That is, yeast cells are suitable for heterologous expression and the study of viral proteins.

Here, we would like to provide a brief insight into the research results of viral proteins produced in the fission yeast S. pombe, with particular attention to the Human Immunodeficiency Virus type 1, (HIV-1) Vpr protein, which has been extensively studied in this yeast species.

HIV1 causes Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) by damaging the immune system, which is a life-threatening condition. The HIV-1 genome contains several genes, and each protein encoded by these genes has a special role 118, 119. Cloning of these viral genes into S. pombe-specific vectors allowed the researchers to determine the exact cellular localization of the GFP (Green Fluorescent Protein)-tagged viral proteins in the yeast cells 119. The localization of many proteins was revealed for the first time, while further results demonstrated that the intracellular localization of the viral proteins was the same in the yeast and human cells 119.

The Vpr gene (Virus protein R) which encodes a component of virus particles that promotes virus infectivity, has been studied in detail 118. One of the goals was to find out which cellular processes of the host cells are affected by the Vpr protein and whether the same processes are inhibited in the yeast cells and the human cells. Since the S. pombe genomic sequence 14, and the genetic background of its cell processes were well-known, and in addition, a large number of mutant strains were available in this species, it was possible to express the Vpr gene both in the wild-type and various mutant strains. The overproduction of the Vpr gene product revealed that the Vpr protein caused multiple effects on the host cells. The expression of the viral protein resulted in small colonies, growth delay, abnormal cell morphology, arrest in the G2 phase of the cell cycle, and cell death 120, 121, 122, 123, 124. Besides, the Vpr protein caused depletion of the glutathione, and oxidative stress, stimulating the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) 124, 125, 126. In addition, the direct interaction of the Vpr protein with the proteosome complex, which is responsible for ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation, has also been demonstrated (Fig. 2) 127.

Figure 2 . The Vpr protein caused multiple effects on the S. pombe cells.

Figure 2

To find out how a single viral protein can destroy various cellular processes, the phenotypic changes of the transformed yeast cells were investigated. Examination of cell morphology of the Vpr-transformed cells showed that the changes were caused by several cellular abnormalities, such as disruption of actin cytoskeleton or altered cell polarity 121. Cloning and transformation of the mutant Vpr genes enabled the detection of the effect of a given mutation on the Vpr function. The results obtained in S. pombe showed highly similar changes to the human cells that confirmed the conservation of the Vpr functions. Besides, the truncated genes also revealed that the C-terminal end of the Vpr protein was particularly important for the cell cycle (G2) arrest, while the N-terminal region was required for nuclear localization 128. Chen’s report also demonstrated that the nuclear localization of the Vpr protein was not required for G2 arrest, while it was necessary for cell killing, suggesting that the G2 arrest and cell death caused by Vpr could be independent functions 128.

The investigation of the Vpr-expressing yeast cells shed also light on the molecular background of the cell cycle arrest. The experiments proved that cell cycle arrest correlated well with increased phosphorylation of the Cdc2 kinase, which is the key regulator of mitosis 120, 129. These experiments showed that the regulators of the Cdc2, such as wee1 (encodes an M-phase inhibitor protein kinase) and the cdc25 (encodes a phosphatase, M-phase inducer) were important in the Vpr-induced cell cycle arrest 130, 131. According to the data, the Vpr protein promoted the cytoplasmic compartmentalization of Cdc25 and inhibited its function, which required the Srk1 kinase 123. Since there are differences in cell cycle regulation between S. pombe and S. cerevisiae (the G2/M transition is more important in S. pombe than S. cerevisiae) 53, it was better to choose the fission yeast for the analysis of Vpr-mitosis relation.

The further results also showed that the Vpr protein might affect the cell cycle through different pathways because the rad24 gene (which plays a role in the DNA damage pathway) was also involved in the Vpr-associated cell division defect 131. Based on these results a putative mechanism of the Vpr-induced cell cycle arrest could also be determined 131. The genetic screens, where checkpoint and mitotic regulator mutants were used, have confirmed the complexity of the viral effect, and shed light on the role of further genes, such as rad25, wos2, and hsp16, ef2 that enhanced or suppressed the cell cycle defect or cell death caused by the Vpr protein 124, 130, 132, 133. Examination of Vpr-induced cell death demonstrated that it resembles apoptosis and correlates with changes in mitochondrial morphology. This study described well the pro-apoptotic effects of Vpr 123.

The S. pombe cells were also suitable for finding agents that can reduce the negative effects of the Vpr protein. The H2O2 treatment for example promoted the survival of the Vpr-expressing yeast cells 134, while a simple fission yeast-based screening system allowed to find small molecules that specifically inhibit HIV-1 Vpr 135.

In summary, this simple model organism allowed researchers to reveal the effects of the multifunctional Vpr protein on the host cells. The researchers were able to discover the cellular processes disturbed by the viral protein and their molecular background, while a comparison with the results obtained in mammalian cells showed the conserved characteristics of the viral infection. These results could contribute to a better understanding of the mechanism of viral infection and HIV-1 pathogenesis. Although S. cerevisiae is also used as a model to study the HIV-1 Vpr effects 136, 137, there are some major differences that make S. pombe superior to S. cerevisiae in this regard. Besides the aforementioned cell cycle control point, the Vpr-induced changes in mitochondrial morphology more closely resemble those observed in human cells compared to S. cerevisiae. S. pombe exhibits a greater degree of similarity to humans with respect to mitochondrial features 138. S. pombe displays cell death induced by Vpr that shares some characteristics with apoptosis in human cells, potentially making it a more relevant model for studying this aspect 123.

POMBE FOR PRION BIOLOGY?

Prions are amyloid forms of cellular proteins and are implicated in many incurable and fatal neurodegenerative disorders. Prion disease can be transmitted from organism to organism and is characterized by the accumulation of PrPSc (scrapie isoform of the prion protein). The disease has many forms, such as genetic, sporadic, and acquired 139.

Prions seem to be more widespread than currently appreciated because the research data revealed that yeasts can also have heritable elements transmitted via proteins 140, 141. Since many yeast genome sequences are available, they allow the in silico identification of prion-like genes/proteins in different species 142, 143. In this way, genes with various functions, such as transcriptional regulators, genes involved in sporulation, copper-transport, and translation were identified as prion-associated proteins 141, 143. Structural analyses also showed that asparagine/glutamine-rich domains are linked to amyloidogenesis 140.

In S. pombe 295 PrD (prion-forming domain) containing proteins were identified 143 . One of the prion-like proteins is encoded by the ctr4 gene, the study of which, placed S. pombe on the prion map 143, 144. The overexpressed form of this copper transporter protein was proteinase K-resistant and conferred sensitivity to oxidative stress 143. In addition, overexpression of a S. cerevisiae gene (ScSup35) in S. pombe also demonstrated that this fission yeast can support the formation and propagation of the S. cerevisiae prion 143. Experimental examination of the other genes mentioned above may lead to many new results.

Further characterization of chaperons and heat shock proteins (HSP), as the latter genes are linked to protein folding 139, may reveal especially the new details of prion aggregation. A study has revealed for example that the C-terminal region of HSP104 plays an essential role in prion propagation 145, while the results of Reidy and co-workers confirmed the role of other chaperons in prion propagation 146. As also S. pombe has many hsp genes and genes with GO term “heat shock protein binding” (GO:0031072) (PomBase), their investigation can significantly expand our knowledge of prion disease.

THE DARK HORSE OF EUKARYOTIC CELL RESEARCH: SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES JAPONICUS

The most divergent branch of the fission yeast genus is the dimorphic S. japonicus 44, 10, 147, which has several features that make it an interesting prospect among other model organisms 32, 148, 149.

First and foremost, S. japonicus is able to switch between a unicellular yeast form and a true invasive hyphal form 150, 151, 152, 153, 154. Hyphal switching can occur through different stimuli: nutrient deprivation 150, DNA damage 153, 154, the presence of fetal bovine serum (FBS) or fruit extracts 155, 156, and negatively regulated by quorum sensing 157. S. japonicus is not pathogenic to humans, despite its ability to form invasive hyphae that penetrate solid surfaces like agar or gelatine 150, 156, 158. Moreover, hyphal extension is initiated in the presence of FBS even in liquid media, and elevated transcription levels of certain protease-coding genes can be observed in the hyphae 155, 159. Thus, it can be a good non-pathogenic model to study the fungal dimorphism. However, some unique features distinguish it from other dimorphic species such as C. albicans. S. japonicus hyphae does not have a Spitzenkörper, undergoes complete cell divisions, and remains mononuclear 156. Additionally, one of the master regulators of the yeast-to mycelia transition, the transcription factor Nrg1 behaves differently in S. japonicus. In C. albicans, NRG1 represses morphological transition 160, 161, while in S. japonicus, it rather acts as an activator of the hyphal switch 157, 159. Further differences can be observed as nitrogen starvation is a signal that induces a morphological switch in C. albicans, but it is not effective in S. japonicus 162, 163. In this regard, it seems that the MAPK signal transduction pathways contribute somewhat differently to hyphal induction in S. japonicus than in C. albicans 157, 163. Besides, the hyphae of S. japonicus are photoresponsive, which is also an unusual feature among most of the other yeasts 164.

However, S. japonicus is also quite different from its closest relative. While a handful of studies suggest S. pombe can produce adhesive and invasive hyphae-like phenotypes under specific conditions or certain genetic backgrounds 165, 166, 167, 168, 169, 170, S. japonicus remains the definitive dimorphic species within the genus. Furthermore, S. japonicus utilizes a semi-open form of mitosis, while S. pombe undergoes closed mitosis, they differ in the regulation of chromatin-nuclear envelope interactions during mitosis, moreover they exhibit discrepancies in their dynamics of cytokinesis and gene regulation too 171, 172, 38, 173, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186. For example, while S. pombe assembles the actomyosin ring in metaphase and requires a mechanism to prevent its premature constriction, S. japonicus initiates ring assembly only at the mitotic exit, similarly to metazoan cells 149, 176, 187. Although all the fission yeasts have large, centromeric regions with repetitive sequences, S. japonicus does not have specialized pericentromeric repeat sequences as S. pombe has, but it has a larger complement of retrotransposons clustered at centromeric and telomeric regions 10, 60, 188. The S. japonicus centromeres consist of arrays of retrotransposons, which is reminiscent of the human centromeric structure, moreover, the RNAi pathway is indispensable for both S. japonicus and mammalians 188, 189, 190, 191. In S. japonicus, RNAi-mediated silencing of retrotransposons is essential to maintain centromere function and genome integrity, while the other fission yeasts rely on the CENP-B proteins and use RNAi exclusively for heterochromatin maintenance 10, 60, 188, 192. They exhibit discrepancy in their cell-wall composition too: the O-glycans on the cell surface of S. pombe, S. octosporus, and S. cryophilus mainly composed of tetra-saccharides, whereas those of S. japonicus mostly consist of trisaccharides (Gal-Man-Man) 193, 194. Besides, S. japonicus has a wider temperature tolerance: the growth of S. pombe is largely restricted above 37°C, S. japonicus can even grow at 42°C and the generation time is somewhat shorter of S. japonicus than that of S. pombe 32, 148. Strikingly, S. japonicus is well-adapted to anaerobic conditions as it has respiratory deficiency and is able to grow anaerobically without sterol supplementation, which is an unusual ability among eukaryotic organisms 195, 196, 197, 198. In this context, S. japonicus can grow much faster under fermentative conditions than S. pombe, and produces ethanol even at 42°C 197. Alam and co-workers showed that in spite of the fact that S. japonicus does not respire oxygen, it is capable of efficient NADH oxidation, amino acid synthesis, and ATP generation via modification of metabolic pathways 199. S. japonicus is also a suitable model to study membrane bilayer properties and dynamics in anoxic environments, knowing that numerous changes can occur in the membrane lipidomes under hypoxic conditions, for example, in a tumor microenvironment 200, 201, 202.

The phylogenetic distance within the Schizosaccharomyces genus is uniquely large, despite the fact, that they possess remarkably conserved gene content, gene order and gene structure. According to Sipiczki and Rhind et al., at the level of protein sequence identity (~55%), S. japonicus is as distant from S. pombe as the platypus is to humans 44, 10. Interestingly, there might be no genus of Ascomycota that exhibits such a high degree of gene content conservation and sequence divergence at the same time 48, 49, 203. Such sequence divergence, besides the high amount of common gene content, really provides an excellent model pair to study the same cellular processes in different genetic backgrounds. Since most of the laboratory protocols developed for S. pombe can also be used (with slight modifications) for S. japonicus, the parallel investigation of these two species provides an unprecedented opportunity 174, 201, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215.

After we showed that S. japonicus is a remarkable model organism by itself or in comparison with other species, we can ask the question: what is S. japonicus able to bring to human disease research? The answer is not so trivial.

S. JAPONICUS HYPHAL GROWTH AS A MODEL TO STUDY THE INVADOPODIA OF TUMOR CELLS

Besides the above-mentioned advantages of S. japonicus, so far no comparisons have been made between mammalian cells and hyphal growth. This is not surprising because mammalian cells do not form structures such as hyphae, do they? We can say that mammalian cells do not have structures corresponding to hyphae, except for one that resembles its behavior: the invadopodium.

Generally, invadopodia can be described as membrane protrusions, which play a key role in cancer metastasis. These actin-rich structures can reach a diameter of 3 µm and extend several micrometers in length 216. It can digest the surrounding tissues by proteases, to help disseminate the cancerous cells.

One could say that both invadopodia and hyphae are very specialized structures with different roles. However, invasive cell growth may have a deep origin, in which particular features are common among the different lineages 217. Thus, comparisons can be made along five main aspects: polarized growth, actin cytoskeleton, vesicle trafficking, substrate degradation, and environmental sensing (Fig. 3).

Figure 3 . Common features of tumor invadopodia and hyphal growth.(A) Tumor invadopodium invades the extracellular matrix (ECM) among healthy cells. (B) Extension of invasive hypha of the fission yeast S. japonicus in the solid medium among normal vegetative yeast cells. (C) Common features enable a direct comparison between cancer invadopodia (left side) and the fungal hyphae (right side). Polarized growth: both fungal hyphae and invadopodia grow in a polarized way. Actin cytoskeleton: the polarized growth is primarily driven by actin polymerization, and it needs changes in the cytoskeletal structure. Vesicle trafficking: invadopodia formation or hyphae growth is unimaginable without vesicle transport. Matrix/substrate degradation: to continue expansion and acquire nutrition, both the invadopodia and the hyphae need to release enzymes that degrade their surrounding environment. Environmental sensing: signals from the environment have a substantial impact on the behavior of cells. Invadopodia formation and yeast-to-hyphae transition are affected by environmental factors like nutrient availability, pH, temperature, or CO2. *Although transcriptome analysis of the hyphae of S. japonicus suggested that several coding genes responsible for the production of vacuolar hydrolases were upregulated during hyphal extension 159, further studies are required to assess the extent of substrate degradation in S. japonicus.

Figure 3

Polarized growth

Both fungal hyphae and invadopodia grow in a polarized way. When S. japonicus cells switch from the yeast phase to hyphal growth, they switch from bipolar to unipolar (polarized) growth 151, 156. Similarly, the invadopodium is formed in a specific part of the cell, where the early invadopodium precursors have accumulated 218. The data suggest that this protrusion is often found near the nucleus and Golgi system 219. In addition, not only the position of protrusions themselves but also the polarized exocytosis of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are the indicators of the polarized growth of invadopodia 220, 221, 222. Polarized growth is maintained by the continuous balance of exocytosis and endocytosis 221, and requires an alteration in the actin cytoskeleton in the hyphae too 151, 156.

Actin cytoskeleton

Both invadopodia and hyphae have the same core mechanism, which drives their growth. In the case of invadopodia, the main core structure is F-actin with its regulators (WASP, N-WASP, Arp2/3) 223, 224. The activation of the Arp2/3 complex is a critical step in invadopodia formation, which is responsible for the nucleation of actin 223. Similarly, the accumulation of actin structures at the tips of the growing hyphae was noticed in S. japonicus 151, 156. In addition, Arp2/3 complex activation (presence) was also required for C. albicans hyphae formation 225.

The polarized growth is primarily driven by actin polymerization, which is initiated by the polarisome protein complex 226. Its components play an important role in the polymerization of F-actin into cables, which is required for the proper hyphae formation of C. albicans 226. Similarly, actin polymerization occurs in the invadopodium maturation, in its third step 218. In the case of the fission yeasts, the formin For3 is responsible for actin cable assembly 156, 227. In S. japonicus, actin polymerization is essential for polarized growth as the cells did not show polarized growth at all in the absence of For3 156. Besides, actin depolymerization abolished all vesicle trafficking and cell tip localization of Ypt3 (Rab11 family GTPase), which has a role in cytoskeleton organization 156.

Cortactin, which is another important nucleation-promoting factor, has an important role in the stabilization of the branched actin network and it has a major role in all steps of invadopodia formation 228. Interestingly, the downregulation of cortactin via the p38 pathway resulted in the inhibition of the function and formation of invadopodia in colon cancer 229. In S. japonicus, sty1, which is the orthologue of p38, negatively regulates the induction and progression of hyphal growth 157. The latter indicates that the regulation of certain genes may be similar in invadopodia and hyphae. Therefore, there are critical points that share similarities in mechanism and are also conserved at the gene level.

Vesicle trafficking

Invadopodia formation or hyphae growth is unimaginable without vesicle transport. Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNARE) are key components of vesicle transport which enable fusion between two membranes in an effective and coordinated way, thus allowing delivery of vesicle contents to the target site 230. Gorshtein and co-workers recently reviewed that the inhibition of vesicle trafficking and SNARE family members inhibit invadopodia formation 231.

Similarly, SNARE family members are required for appropriate transport of the cargo vesicles which is essential for hyphal extension and leads to abolished or reduced virulence in pathogenic fungi 230, 232. These data are supported by the strong vacuolization of the S. japonicus hyphae 151, 155, 156. Ypt3 vesicles accumulate at the growing hyphal tips of S. japonicus with a greater intensity than in the yeast cell tips. This probably reflects an increase in membrane trafficking to maintain growth rate of the hyphae 156. In conclusion, the growth of S. japonicus hyphae relies on the transport of vesicles on actin filaments for polarized growth with increased rates of vesicular transport.

Substrate degradation

To continue expansion and acquire nutrition, the hyphae need to release enzymes that degrade their surrounding environment. For example, the C. albicans hyphae produce the secreted aspartyl proteases (SAP), similarly to the cancer cells that digest the host proteins to acquire nutrients 233, 234, 36. In the case of tumor cells, extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation is a crucial step in invading new organs, thus metastasizing 235. Invadopodia release MMPs, which degrade the ECM, facilitating the invasion process 220. It is not clear whether invadopodia formation is also driven by nutrient availability, however, according to van Horssen and co-workers, the metabolic activity of the cancer cell regulates matrix degradation 236.

Although S. japonicus does not have C. albicans-like SAP orthologues, transcriptome analysis of the hyphae of S. japonicus suggested that several coding genes responsible for the production of vacuolar hydrolases were upregulated during hyphal extension (Supplementary Table S1) 159. This finding parallels observations in C. albicans and invadopodia, where hyphal growth is associated with the secretion of hydrolytic enzymes that degrade their surroundings 237, 238, 239. Although further studies are required to assess the extent of substrate degradation in S. japonicus, the elevated expression levels suggest that these enzymes play a role in hyphal elongation, likely in a manner similar to that observed in C. albicans.

Environmental sensing

Signals from the environment have a great impact on the behavior of cells. In most cases, the yeast-to-hyphae transition is affected by nutrient availability, pH, and temperature. In S. japonicus, acidic pH and 37°C, along with different types of nitrogen sources, have a significant impact on filamentous growth 150, 155. In C. albicans, besides the aforementioned factors, CO2 and adherence have triggered filamentous growth 240.

Invadopodia formation is also affected by similar factors, such as pH, CO2, and glucose availability 223, 241. In general, the microenvironment of the tumor plays a crucial role in invadopodia formation and thus in metastasis 242.

Table 2. Common orthologues of S. japonicus and humans, whose expression levels are changed in the hyphae and invadopodia in a similar way.

S. japonicus gene identifier

human gene

log2 inva

log2 hyph

Intersecting GO categories

SJAG_04499

P54868

2.052

0.888

acetyl-CoA metabolic process (GO:0006084)

SJAG_03763

Q5TDH0

1.073

0.383

proteolysis (GO:0006508)

SJAG_04224

Q12788

1.049

0.288

endonucleolytic cleavage to generate mature 5'-end of SSU-rRNA from (SSU-rRNA, 5.8S rRNA, LSU-rRNA)(GO:0000472)

SJAG_03961

P22557

0.964

1.126

protoporphyrinogen IX biosynthetic process (GO:0006782)

SJAG_03693

O95373

0.916

0.203

protein import to nucleus (GO:0006606)

SJAG_01209

Q15124

0.857

0.510

carbohydrate metabolic process (GO:0005975)

SJAG_03401

Q9BXP2

0.813

0.941

monoatomic ion transport (GO:0006811)

SJAG_03866

A0A2R8Y635

0.761

0.457

transmembrane transport (GO:0055085)

SJAG_00451

Q9UI42

0.757

0.476

proteolysis (GO:0006508)

SJAG_0230

Q9UNX4

0.669

0.478

maturation of SSU-rRNA (GO:0030490)

SJAG_04204

P08708

0.662

0.548

translation (GO:0006412)

SJAG_01438

P13639

0.607

0.540

translation (GO:0006412)

SJAG_00911

Q9BZJ0

-0.597

-0.718

spliceosomal complex assembly (GO:0000245)

SJAG_04821

Q96F25

-0.603

-0.792

dolichol-linked oligosaccharide biosynthetic process (GO:0006488)

SJAG_04308

Q9NVU7

-0.662

-0.349

ribosomal large subunit export from nucleus (GO:0000055)

SJAG_00272

P40938

-0.668

-0.938

DNA replication (GO:0006260)

SJAG_00111

Q149N8

-0.669

-2.141

protein polyubiquitination (GO:0000209)

SJAG_01924

Q9Y5U8

-0.761

-0.363

mitochondrial pyruvate transmembrane transport (GO:0006850)

SJAG_04540

Q13216

-0.775

-0.604

protein polyubiquitination (GO:0000209)

SJAG_04307

A0A8Q3WKR8

-0.866

-0.400

isoprenoid biosynthetic process (GO:0008299)

SJAG_03436

Q81Y18

-0.931

-0.605

double-strand break repair via homologous recombination (GO:0000724)

SJAG_02625

Q14997

-0.972

-0.452

DNA repair (GO0006281)

SJAG_00851

O75037

-1.080

-1.207

microtubule-based movement (GO:0007018)

SJAG_16456

Q96GW9

-1.289

-0.795

translation (GO:0006412)

SJAG_04068

P11168

-3.039

-0.696

carbohydrate transport (GO:0008643)

SJAG_03434

P80404

-3.543

-1.596

gamma-aminobutyric acid metabolic process (GO:0009448)

Each row corresponds to an orthologous protein pair, includes their S. japonicus and human identifiers, and their log2-transformed values, which show their mRNA levels in invadopodia (log2 inva) and hyphae (log2 hyph). Besides, the intersection of Gene Ontology (GO) terms, and the associated GO categories are listed in it. To create this table, we downloaded the human proteome from UniProt (https://www.uniprot.org/ accessed on 12.27.2023.) and the S. japonicus proteome from JaponicusDB (https://www.japonicusdb.org/ accessed on 12.27.2023.). Reciprocal BLAST analysis was carried out using blast+ (ver. 2.13.0) 16. The cutoff value was set to E ≤ 1 × 10-30. Based on these data, we found 1774 common orthologues between S. japonicus and H. sapiens. Then this list was further filtered using the data from243 and159, resulting in a total of 86 genes. These genes were subjected to categorization by GO terms (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/QuickGO/help/slims accessed on 12.27.2023.), specifically focusing on the terms associated with biological processes. Only the terms that were present in both species were retained. At last, 26 genes remained, whose belonged to the same GO categories and expressed in a similar way.

Common orthologues and gene regulation

As we have seen in these subchapters, yeast-to-hyphae transition and invadopodia formation have many features in common and are comparable to each other. Despite their distinct functionality, the core mechanisms are very similar. To determine whether these two processes share common genes, we compared the RNA sequencing data from S. japonicus hyphae and invadopodia, without claiming completeness 159, 243. In the case of the S. japonicus hyphae, 1337 genes were significantly upregulated, of which 112 genes showed expression above log2 fold change 2 159. 1484 genes were significantly downregulated, among which 109 had log2 fold changes below 2 159. In the cancer invadopodia, 5873 genes showed elevated expression, while 5467 genes showed decreased expression levels 243. Based on the data of JaponicusDB (accessed on 2024.07.02.), S. japonicus and humans share ~3500 common orthologues (https://www.japonicusdb.org/data/orthologs/). According to our more stringent approach, strict reciprocal BLASTp analyses (E value ≤ 1 × 10-30) revealed 1774 common putative orthologues between S. japonicus and H. sapiens (Supplementary Table S2) 16. The list of common orthologues was compared to the gene lists of the RNA seq obtained from S. japonicus hyphae 159 and human invadopodia 243, which resulted in a total of 85 common genes (Supplementary Table S3). These genes were subjected to categorization by Gene Ontology (GO) terms, considering mainly the common biological processes. In this way, the common orthologue number was reduced to 53 (Supplementary Table S4). 26 genes out of 53 exhibited similar regulation in both hyphae and invadopodia (Table 2), whereas 27 genes showed opposite regulation (Supplementary Table S4). Several gene pairs belonged to the GO categories of transport or metabolic processes (Table 2 and Supplementary table S4). Although the number of common orthologues is quite small and half of the genes were differently regulated, they might still be good indicators or starting points for further investigation of regulatory mechanisms.

We should bear in mind that this is only one pairwise comparison from one-on-one specific conditions, data from different circumstances might result in substantially different gene sets. Moreover, we should also consider the fact that invadopodia are formed in cells that carry severe genetic mutations, in contrast to the normal genetic background of S. japonicus in which the hyphae were produced. Taking these considerations into account, we would consider it particularly interesting to examine the S. japonicus hyphae production in such a mutational genetic background that resembles the genetic background of the invadopodia. In particular because some S. japonicus cell cycle mutant strains produced somewhat different hyphae (Fig. 4 C, D), compared to the wild-type strain (Fig. 4 A, B).

Figure 4 . Microscopic and macroscopic morphologies of different Schizosaccharomyces japonicus strains. Microscopic morphology of the wild-type S. japonicus cells (A) and colony morphology of the yeast phase and hyphae on agar plate (indicated with white arrows and labels) (B). Cell morphology of a yet unidentified cell separation mutant strain (C) and its yeast phase and hyphae production (D). Cell sizes in (A) and (C) are not to scale, the images concentrate on the cell morphology. Scale bars represent 10 µm. Microscopic images were captured with an Olympus DX-40 microscope and an Olympus DP-70 camera. Photos were taken in different focal planes and stacked with the program Combine ZP.

Figure 4

LABORATORY USE AND TOOLKITS

Although there is a tendency for most molecular toolkits to be developed for S. cerevisiae first, then adapt to the fission yeasts, sometimes the latter species proves to be a better subject in terms of practical implications. Many wild-type S. cerevisiae strains are used as laboratory models, and because of this, it often happens that the same mutation causes different phenotypes in different wild-type strains 244, 245. This often makes the comparison of the results difficult. In contrast, almost every lab working with S. pombe uses the same strains: the L968 h90 homotallic, the L972 h- and the L975 h+ heterotallic strains isolated by Urs Leupold 246. As a result, majority of the studies using S. pombe can be directly compared and contrasted. Furthermore, L968 is a natural isolate, which does not behave differently compared to the other natural isolates 247.

Numerous useful databases, protocols and toolkits have arisen through the years for the fission yeasts. Virtually, all the molecular biology tools available were adapted or can be adapted to fission yeasts, from standard gene replacements to CRISPR-Cas9 and from FISH to Hi-C systems 248, 249, 250, 251, 252. Since Herrera-Camacho and co-workers have presented many useful applications for S. pombe, here we just focus on the recently described methods, online tools and algorithms (Table 3 and 4) 251.

Table 3. Online platforms and bioinformatic tools for the fission yeasts.

Databases/Tools

Links

Pombase

https://www.pombase.org/

Forsburg lab

https://dornsife.usc.edu/pombenet/

Bähler lab

https://www.bahlerlab.info/resources/

EnsemblFungi

http://funig.ensembl.org/Schizosaccaromyces_pombe/Info/Index

EnsemblFung

https://funig.ensembl.org/Schizosaccaromyces_japonicus/Info/Index

JaponicusDB

https://www.japonicusdb.org/

Oliferenko lab

http://www.oliferenkolab.uk/protocols.html

Japonet

https://shigen.nig.ac.jp/yeast/japonet/

Methods/Tools

Description

Reference

Protein function prediction

Phenomics and machine-learning approaches to predict protein function

253

pomBseen

Analysis pipeline for the quantitation of fission yeat micrographs containnig bright-field channel and up to two fluorescent channels

254

DeepEdit

A powerful tool for the study of RNA editing

255

DeePiCt

An open-source deep-learning framework for supervised segmentation and macromolecuar complex localization in cryo-electron tomography

256

3D models of chromosomes

Building 3D models from raw Hi-C data

257

YEASTRACT+

Tool for the analysis, prediction and modelling of transcription regulatory data

258

PTMint

Manually curated complete experimental evidence of the PTM regulation on protein-protein interactions

259

Metabolic modelling

Computational modeling of metabolic networks

260

Photo Phenosizer

Machine learning-based method to measure cell dimensions

261

3D-SIM pipeline

Three-dimensional structured illumination microscopy (3D-SIM) image analysis pipeline for nuclear pore complex quantitation

262

Serine phosphorylation prediction

A computational predictor was proposed to predict serine phophorylation sites mapping on S. pombe

263

Yesprit and Yeaseq

Applications for designing primers and browsing sequences in four fission yeast species

264

GproDIA

A framwork for the proteome-wide characterization of intact glacopeptides from data independent acquisition (DIA) data with comprehensive statistical control

265

Spindle elongation dynamics

An ImageJ plugin that can automatically track S. pombe spindle length over time and replace manual or semi-automated tracking of spindle elongation dynamics

266

ChroMo

An interactive, unsupervised cloud application specifically designed for exploring chromosome movement datasets from live imaging

267

Table 4. Recent experimental tools and protocols for the fission yeasts.

Methods/Tools

Description

References

Quantifying turgor pressure

Experimental approach to access turgor pressure in yeasts based upon the determination of isotonic concentration using protoplasts as osmometers

268

POMBOX

Modular tools for generating plasmids with up to 12 transcriptional units

269

New vectors

New S. pombe vector systems employing lys1 and arg3 as markers

270

CRISPRi

CRISPR interference method to study essential genes in S. pombe

271, 272

BiFCo

Introduction of bimolecular fluorescent cohesin to monitor cohesin complex assembly and disassembly

273

CRISPR-Cas13d

Implementation of the CRISPR-Cas13d system in fission yeast for RNA knockdown

274

Kinetochore nanostructure

Construction of a nanometer-precise in situ map of the human-like regional kintetochore of S. pombe using multi-color single-molecule localization microscopy

275

Heterothallic strains

Creating heterothallic strains of S. pombe

276

SLIPT

Introduction of self-localizing ligand-induced protein translocation (SLIPT) system in S. pombe

277

SILAC

Stable isotope labeling by amino acids (SILAC) to apply for protein identification and quantification

278

TCP-seq

Translation-complex profiling of fission yeast cells

279

Visualizing tropomyosins

Tools to visualize tropomyosins in four different organisms/cell types using an mNG fusion strategy

280

Barcoded mutant arrays

Construction of a S. pombe transposon insertion library

281

Mulitcopy suppressors

A protocol for carrying out 'multicopy suppression'-based genetic screen in S. pombe

282

Fluorescnece exclusion

A rapid, accurate and powerful method for measuring yeast cell volume

283

Protein-RNA interactions

Quantitative analysis of protein-RNA interactions

284

DNA Curtain Technique

DNA curtain is a hybrid technique that combines lipid fluidity, microfluidics, and total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (TIRFM) to provide a universal platform for real-time imaging of diverse protein-DNA interactions

285

PDE inhibitors

Platform for expressing cloned cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases (PDEs) and robust screening for small molecule inhibitors that are cell permeable

286

Cell cycle stage

Detecting cell cycle stage and progression in fission yeast

287

Cell cycle synchrony

Cell cycle synchrony methods for fission yeast

288

Mitotic inheritance of histone modifications

A framework to successfully implement an inducible heterochromatin establishment system and evaluate its molecular properties

289

DRIP assay

Antibody-based DNA:RNA immunoprecipitation (DRIP) strategy

290

Near-infrared imaging

Easy use of multiplexed live-cell imaging in fission yeast with a broader color palette

291

Protein interactions

Introduction of an efficient and convenient method termed the Pil1 co-tethering assay to detect binary, ternary, and quaternary protein interactions

292

Local protein accumulation kinetics

A detailed protocol for determining protein accumulation kinetics at the division site in S. pombe and S. cerevisiae

293

G-Quadruplex-DNA-Disrupting Small Molecules

In vitro assays to reliably identify molecules able to destabilize G-quadruplex-DNA

294

New vectors

New vectors to simplify the genome editing protocols

295

Hyphal RNA isolation

Simple method to grow hyphae and isolate quality RNA from hyphal tips

158

AID vectors

Two plasmids that facilitate the introduction of the mini auxin-inducible degron (mAID) tag with a FLAG epitope or GFP by the conventional PCR-based gene targeting method

296

Both S. pombe and S. japonicus have their own dedicated databases: PomBase and JaponicusDB, which are community-curated (Table 3) 14, 15. These platforms summarize the results reported by the researchers working with the fission yeasts; they enable a rapid overview of the recent developments in many topics.

LIMITATIONS

Despite all good features of yeasts, they also have their own limiting factors. Since all the fission yeast species have their unique elements of metabolic pathways and protein interaction networks, most of the biological processes can only be "similar" to their human counterparts. Although we could gain useful information about human diseases using fission yeast models 297, 298, 299, 300, 301, 302, 303, 304, 305, there will always be differences that we should be cautious about. At the same time, complex processes cannot be investigated because of the lack of multicellular phenotypes. But beyond the trivial, there are other factors to consider.

The creation of auxotrophic mutant strains is a widely used procedure in yeast genetics. Auxotrophic mutant strains enable researchers to easily verify the success of a gene deletion or plasmid vector introduction into the cells, for example. However, there is emerging evidence that a knockdown of even a simple metabolic gene could produce a pleiotropic effect, which causes a complex phenotype leading to false conclusions. For instance, a defect in certain amino acid (AA) biosynthetic pathways may activate the general AA control and suppress the TOR pathway, depending on the growth conditions 306, 307, 308. In the case of S. pombe, leucine (Leu) auxotroph strains have been used for decades 309, although Leu auxotrophy can cause altered intracellular response compared to the prototrophic wild-type strain 307. Similarly, the use of the URA3 gene as a selective marker caused decreased virulence in C. albicans, thus, it resulted in misleading phenotypes 310, 311. The effect could be more severe in the case of strains that have two or more auxotrophies. The situation is not much better when using antibiotic-resistant genes as genetic markers. To ensure a sufficient expression of the marker gene, constitutive promoters are generally used. Those promoters sometimes act bidirectional or might elevate the expression levels of the neighboring genes too 312. In that particular case, we are again facing a pleiotropic phenotype. It is also common practice to knock out one of the members of the non-homologous DNA end joining (NHEJ) repair system to enhance gene targeting efficiency. Without efficient NHEJ, the cells ideally use the homologous recombination repair system, which enables precise integration of the foreign DNA into the target genome. Despite NHEJ-deficient strains showing normal phenotypes in standard circumstances, NHEJ members have many other roles that go beyond just joining DNA ends. In S. pombe, the Pku70-Pku80 heterodimer plays a critical role in telomere length maintenance and recovery from replication stress 313, 314. In S. japonicus, disruption of the Ligase 4 (lig4) gene resulted in a seemingly normal phenotype 315. However, increased sporulation on complete medium, decreased hyphal growth, faster chronological aging, and higher sensitivity to heat shock, UV light, and caffeine can be observed in the lig4-disrupted strains 315. Thus, gene characterization conducted in an NHEJ-deficient strain could also lead to incorrect conclusions.

Although we are able to track dynamic cellular processes by using chemical inhibitors, many drugs are not efficient enough for fission yeasts because of their multidrug resistance (MDR) 316, 317, 318. Thus, finding a new therapeutic agent or investigating the performance of a candidate might not work well in the fission yeast (or in other yeasts). However, there are several counterexamples, of course 319, 320. It is even possible to make fission yeasts sensitive to drugs by engineering their MDR-related genes 318, but the effect of those gene deletions might resemble the gene deletion effects of other metabolic or DNA repair pathway genes.

In fact, any gene knockdown could cause secondary gene mutations or overall genomic imbalance, which initiates adaptive genomic changes 321. Of course, the purpose of many studies is exactly to understand these changes. But we should bear in mind, that all the yeasts have a very short generation time, and the continuous inoculation of their cells could result in multiple bottlenecks and in parallel, forced genome evolution. There is a lot of anecdotal evidence circulating among researchers when they experience that a mutant yeast strain completely changes its behavior after a certain number of rounds of inoculation. To provide experimental evidence, Szamecz et al. showed that many knockout strains have recovered and exhibited almost as good fitness as the wild-type strain did after certain rounds of generation 322. Although they performed their experiments with S. cerevisiae, their result could easily be true for the fission yeasts too.

CONCLUSIONS

With this particular review, we would have liked to emphasize the importance of the fission yeast models, as we are convinced that they still have many unexploited benefits. Although the number of researchers using fission yeasts is relatively high, the size of the fission yeast community is nowhere near the size of the budding yeast community. Obviously, in many cases, it is easier to work with S. cerevisiae, but the fission yeasts share substantially more fundamental biological processes with the metazoans. Therefore, we wanted to highlight some of the differences between budding and fission yeast models, without claiming completeness. Besides, we also wanted to promote S. japonicus as a less-known, but emerging model organism with unique features. As we have shown, S. japonicus is more similar to mammalian cells in certain features than S. pombe is. Moreover, in our view, S. japonicus can easily be a non-mammalian model for tumor invadopodia studies, since the fundamental processes of invadopodia formation and hyphae formation can be rationally compared. Although it is obvious that none of the yeasts can be used as equivalent models of human diseases, we believe that the fission yeasts could substantially contribute to our understanding of the molecular background of human diseases.

Abbreviations

AA - amino acid,

AS - alternative splicing,

ECM - extracellular matrix,

FBS - fetal bovine serume,

GO - gene ontology,

HIV-1 - Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1,

MDR - multidrug resistance,

MMP - matrix metalloproteinase,

MTHFR - methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase,

NHEJ - non-homologous end joining,

NuRD - nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase,

PPI - protein-protein interaction,

RNAi - RNA interference,

SAP - secreted aspartyl protease,

Y2H - yeast-two-hybrid

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no competing interests.

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

All supplemental data for this article are available online at https://www.microbialcell.com/researcharticles/2024a-acs-szabo-microbial-cell/

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors of this review apologize to the many authors whose articles have not been cited for reasons of length. Laszlo Attila Papp received funding from the project TKP2021-EGA-18. Project no. TKP2021-EGA-18 has been implemented with the support provided by the Ministry of Culture and Innovation of Hungary from the National Research, Development and Innovation Fund, financed under the TKP2021-EGA funding scheme. This publication was supported by the University of Debrecen Program for Scientific Publication.

Biographies

Department of Genetics and Applied Microbiology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary

Department of Genetics and Applied Microbiology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary

Contributor Information

Lajos Acs-Szabo, Email: acs-szabo.lajos@science.unideb.hu.

Ida Miklos, Email: miklos.ida@science.unideb.hu.

References

  1. NCBI Genome List https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/browse/#!/eukaryotes/ [2024-01-30]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/browse/#!/eukaryotes/
  2. Etherington G J, Wu P-S, Oliferenko S, Uhlmann F, Nieduszynski C A. Telomere-to-telomere Schizosaccharomyces japonicus genome assembly reveals hitherto unknown genome features. Yeast. 2023;41(3):73–86. doi: 10.1002/yea.3912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden T L. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10(1):421–421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Shen J, Huang Q, Jia W, Feng S, Liu L, Li X, Tao D, Xie D. YAP1 induces invadopodia formation by transcriptionally activating TIAM1 through enhancer in breast cancer. Oncogene. 2022;41(31):3830–3845. doi: 10.1038/s41388-022-02344-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Papp L A, Ács-Szabó L, Batta G, Miklós I. Molecular and comparative genomic analyses reveal evolutionarily conserved and unique features of the Schizosaccharomyces japonicus mycelial growth and the underlying genomic changes. Curr Genet. 2021;67(6):953–968. doi: 10.1007/s00294-021-01206-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rhind N. Comparative Functional Genomics of the Fission Yeasts. Science. 2011;332(6032):930–936. doi: 10.1126/science.1203357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Wood V. The genome sequence of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nature. 2002;415(6874):871–880. doi: 10.1038/nature724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Goffeau A, Barrell B G, Bussey H, Davis R W, Dujon B, Feldmann H, Galibert F, Hoheisel J D, Jacq C, Johnston M, Louis E J, Mewes H W, Murakami Y, Philippsen P, Tettelin H, Oliver S G. Life with 6000 Genes. Science. 1996;274(5287):546–567. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5287.546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hoog M Van Het, Rast T J, Martchenko M, Grindle S, Dignard D, Hogues H, Cuomo C, Berriman M, Scherer S, Magee B B, Whiteway M, Chibana H, Nantel A, Magee P T. Assembly of the Candida albicans genome into sixteen supercontigs aligned on the eight chromosomes. Genome Biol. 2007;8(4):52–52. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-4-r52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Harris M A, Rutherford K M, Hayles J, Lock A, Bähler J, Oliver S G, Mata J, Wood V. Fission stories: using PomBase to understand Schizosaccharomyces pombe biology. Genetics. 2022;220(4):222–222. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyab222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Rutherford K M, Harris M A, Oliferenko S, V Wood. JaponicusDB: rapid deployment of a model organism database for an emerging model species. Genetics. 2022;220(4):223–223. doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyab223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Heinicke S, Livstone M S, Lu C, Oughtred R, Kang F, Angiuoli S V, White O, Botstein D, Dolinski K. The Princeton Protein Orthology Database (P-POD): A Comparative Genomics Analysis Tool for Biologists. PLoS ONE. 2007;2(8):766–766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000766. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Riley R, et al. Comparative genomics of biotechnologically important yeasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2016;113(35):9882–9887. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1603941113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Scannell D R, Butler G, Wolfe K H. Yeast genome evolution-the origin of the species. Yeast. 2007;24(11):929–942. doi: 10.1002/yea.1515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Forsburg S L, Rhind N. Basic methods for fission yeast. Yeast. 2006;23(3):173–183. doi: 10.1002/yea.1347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Knop M. Evolution of the hemiascomycete yeasts: on life styles and the importance of inbreeding. BioEssays. 2006;28(7):696–708. doi: 10.1002/bies.20435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ibrahim A S, Magee B B, Sheppard D C, Yang M, Kauffman S, Becker J, Edwards J E, Magee P T. Effects of Ploidy and Mating Type on Virulence of Candida albicans. Infect Immun. 2005;73(11):7366–7374. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.11.7366-7374.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Cheeseman I M, Drubin D G, Barnes G. Simple centromere, complex kinetochore. J Cell Biol. 2002;157(2):199–203. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200201052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Mishra P K, Baum M, Carbon J. Centromere size and position in Candida albicans are evolutionarily conserved independent of DNA sequence heterogeneity. Mol Genet Genomics. 2007;278(4):455–465. doi: 10.1007/s00438-007-0263-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Smirnova J B, Mcfarlane R J. The Unique Centromeric Chromatin Structure of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Is Maintained during Meiosis. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(22):19817–19822. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M200765200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. O’kane C J, Hyland E M. Yeast epigenetics: the inheritance of histone modification states. Biosci Rep. 2019;39(5):20182006–20182006. doi: 10.1042/BSR20182006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Bernstein D A, Vyas V K, Weinberg D E, Drinnenberg I A, Bartel D P, Fink G R. Candida albicans Dicer (CaDcr1) is required for efficient ribosomal and spliceosomal RNA maturation. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(2):523–528. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118859109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Fair B J, Pleiss J A. The power of fission: yeast as a tool for understanding complex splicing. Curr Genet. 2017;63(3):375–380. doi: 10.1007/s00294-016-0647-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Montañés J C, Huertas M, Moro S G, Blevins W R, Carmona M, Ayté J, Hidalgo E, Albà M M. Native RNA sequencing in fission yeast reveals frequent alternative splicing isoforms. Genome Res. 2022;32(6):1215–1227. doi: 10.1101/gr.276516.121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Muzafar S, Sharma R D, Shah A H, Gaur N A, Dasgupta U, Chauhan N, R Prasad. Identification of Genomewide Alternative Splicing Events in Sequential, Isogenic Clinical Isolates of Candida albicans Reveals a Novel Mechanism of Drug Resistance and Tolerance to Cellular Stresses. . mSphere. 2020;5(4):e00608–20. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00608-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Neuvéglise C, Marck C, Gaillardin C. The intronome of budding yeasts. C R Biol. 2011;334(8-9):662–670. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2011.05.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Klar AJS. Schizosaccharomyces japonicus Yeast Poised to Become a Favorite Experimental Organism for Eukaryotic Research. G3 GenesGenomesGenetics. 2013;3(10):1869–1873. doi: 10.1534/g3.113.007187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Dabrowa N, Landau J W, Newcomer V D. Generation time of Candida albicans in synchronized and nonsynchronized cultures. Med Mycol. 1968;6(1):51–56. doi: 10.1080/00362176885190091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Herskowitz I. Life cycle of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol Rev. 1988;52(4):536–553. doi: 10.1128/mr.52.4.536-553.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ekwall K, Thon G. Setting up Schizosaccharomyces pombe Crosses/Matings. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2017;2017(7) doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot091694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Macias-Paz I U, Pérez-Hernández S, Tavera-Tapia A, Luna-Arias J P, Guerra-Cárdenas J E, E Reyna-Beltrán. Candida albicans the main opportunistic pathogenic fungus in humans. Rev Argent Microbiol. 2023;55(2):189–198. doi: 10.1016/j.ram.2022.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Pérez-Torrado R. Opportunistic Strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A Potential Risk Sold in Food Products. Front Microbiol. 2016;6:1522–1522. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Yam C, He Y, Zhang D, Chiam K-H, Oliferenko S. Divergent Strategies for Controlling the Nuclear Membrane Satisfy Geometric Constraints during Nuclear Division. Curr Biol. 2011;21(15):1314–1319. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.06.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Boettcher B, Barral Y. The cell biology of open and closed mitosis. Nucleus. 2013;4(3):160–165. doi: 10.4161/nucl.24676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Allshire R C. Epigenetic Regulation of Chromatin States in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2015;7(7):18770–18770. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Nai Y-S, Huang Y-C, M-R Yen, Chen P-Y. Diversity of Fungal DNA Methyltransferases and Their Association With DNA Methylation Patterns. Front Microbiol. 2021;11:616922–616922. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.616922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Mishra P K, Baum M, Carbon J. DNA methylation regulates phenotype-dependent transcriptional activity in Candida albicans. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108(29):11965–11970. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109631108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Erlendson A A, Friedman S, Freitag M. A Matter of Scale and Dimensions: Chromatin of Chromosome Landmarks in the Fungi. Microbiol Spectr. 2017;5(4):5.4.11. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.FUNK-0054-2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Lindner P. Schizosaccharomyces pombe n. sp., ein neuer Gährungserreger. Wochenschr Für Brau. 1893;10:1298–1300. [Google Scholar]
  40. Beijerinck M W. Schizosaccharomyces octosporus, eine acht-sporige Alkoholhefe. Zentralblatt Bakteriol Parasitenkd. 1894;16:49–58. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yukawa M, Maki T. Schizosaccharomyces japonicus nov. spec. Bul Sci Fak Terkult Kjusu Imp Univ Fukuoka Jpn. 1931;4:218–226. [Google Scholar]
  42. Helston R M, Box J A, Tang W, Baumann P. Schizosaccharomyces cryophilus sp. nov., a new species of fission yeast. FEMS Yeast Res. 2010;10(6):779–786. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2010.00657.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Brysch-Herzberg M, Tobias A, Seidel M, Wittmann R, Wohlmann E, Fischer R, Dlauchy D, Peter G. Schizosaccharomyces osmophilus sp. nov., an osmophilic fission yeast occurring in bee bread of different solitary bee species. FEMS Yeast Res. 2019;19(4):38–38. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/foz038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Brysch-Herzberg M, Jia G, Sipiczki M, Seidel M, Li W, Assali I, Du L. Schizosaccharomyces lindneri sp. nov., a fission yeast occurring in honey. Yeast. 2023;40(7):237–253. doi: 10.1002/yea.3857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Etherington G J, Gil E G, Haerty W, Oliferenko S, Nieduszynski C A. Schizosaccharomyces versatilis represents a distinct evolutionary lineage of fission yeast. Yeast. 2023;41(3):95–107. doi: 10.1002/yea.3919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sipiczki M. Where does fission yeast sit on the tree of life? Genome Biol. 2000;1(2) doi: 10.1186/gb-2000-1-2-reviews1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Liu Y, Leigh J W, Brinkmann H, Cushion M T, Rodriguez-Ezpeleta N, Philippe H, Lang B F. Phylogenomic Analyses Support the Monophyly of Taphrinomycotina, including Schizosaccharomyces Fission Yeasts. Mol Biol Evol. 2009;26(1):27–34. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Shen X-X, Steenwyk J L, Labella A L, Opulente D A, Zhou X, Kominek J, Li Y, Groenewald M, Hittinger C T, Rokas A. Genome-scale phylogeny and contrasting modes of genome evolution in the fungal phylum. Ascomycota. Sci Adv. 2020;6(45):79–79. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd0079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Li Y, Steenwyk J L, Chang Y, Wang Y, James T Y, Stajich J E, Spatafora J W, Groenewald M, Dunn C W, Hittinger C T, Shen X-X, Rokas A. A genome-scale phylogeny of the kingdom Fungi. Curr Biol. 2021;31(8):1653–1665. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.01.074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ács-Szabó L, Papp L A, Antunovics Z, Sipiczki M, Miklós I. Assembly of Schizosaccharomyces cryophilus chromosomes and their comparative genomic analyses revealed principles of genome evolution of the haploid fission yeasts. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):14629–14629. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-32525-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Acs-Szabo L, Papp L A, Sipiczki M, I Miklos. Genome Comparisons of the Fission Yeasts Reveal Ancient Collinear Loci Maintained by Natural Selection. J Fungi. 2021;7(10):864–864. doi: 10.3390/jof7100864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Hoffman C S, Wood V, Fantes P A. An Ancient Yeast for Young Geneticists: A Primer on the Schizosaccharomyces pombe Model System. Genetics. 2015;201(2):403–423. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.181503. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Rosas-Murrieta N H, Rojas-Sánchez G, Reyes-Carmona S R, Martínez-Contreras R D, Martínez-Montiel N, Millán-Pérez-Peña L, Herrera-Camacho I P. In: Study of Cellular Processes in Higher Eukaryotes Using the Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe as a Model. Shah MM., editor. InTech; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  54. Wang Z. Big data mining powers fungal research: recent advances in fission yeast systems biology approaches. Curr Genet. 2017;63(3):427–433. doi: 10.1007/s00294-016-0657-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Vyas A, Freitas A V, Ralston Z A, Tang Z. Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe : A Unicellular “Micromammal” Model Organism. Curr Protoc. 2021;1(6):151–151. doi: 10.1002/cpz1.151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Gerstein A C, Chun H-Je, Grant A, Sp Otto. Genomic Convergence toward Diploidy in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 2006;2(9):145–145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Gerstein A C, Sp Otto. Cryptic Fitness Advantage: Diploids Invade Haploid Populations Despite Lacking Any Apparent Advantage as Measured by Standard Fitness Assays. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(12):26599–26599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Zörgö E, Chwialkowska K, Gjuvsland A B, Garré E, Sunnerhagen P, Liti G, Blomberg A, Omholt S W, Warringer J. Ancient Evolutionary Trade-Offs between Yeast Ploidy States. PLoS Genet. 2013;9(3):1003388–1003388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Seike T, Niki H. Pheromone Response and Mating Behavior in Fission Yeast. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2022;86(4):130–152. doi: 10.1128/mmbr.00130-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. White S A, Allshire R C. In: RNAi-Mediated Chromatin Silencing in Fission Yeast. Paddison P J, P K Vogt, editors. Springer; Berlin Heidelberg; Berlin, Heidelberg: 2008. pp. 157–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Zemach A, Mcdaniel I E, Silva P, Zilberman D. Genome-Wide Evolutionary Analysis of Eukaryotic DNA Methylation. Science. 2010;328(5980):916–919. doi: 10.1126/science.1186366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Tong P, Pidoux A L, Toda Nrt, Ard R, Berger H, Shukla M, Torres-Garcia J, Müller C A, Nieduszynski C A, Allshire R C. Interspecies conservation of organisation and function between nonhomologous regional centromeres. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):2343–2343. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09824-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Cam H P, Sugiyama T, Chen E S, Chen X, Fitzgerald P C, Grewal SIS. Comprehensive analysis of heterochromatin- and RNAi-mediated epigenetic control of the fission yeast genome. Nat Genet. 2005;37(8):809–819. doi: 10.1038/ng1602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Kim S Y, Park S Y, Choi J W, Kim D J, Lee S Y, Lim J H, Han J Y, Ryu H M, Kim M H. Association Between MTHFR 1298A>C Polymorphism and Spontaneous Abortion with Fetal Chromosomal Aneuploidy: MTHFR 1298A>C POLYMORPHISM AND SPONTANEOUS ABORTION. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2011;66(4):252–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.2011.00996.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Shi H, Yang S, Liu Y, Huang P, Lin N, Sun X, Yu R, Zhang Y, Qin Y, Wang L. Study on Environmental Causes and SNPs of MTHFR, MS and CBS Genes Related to Congenital Heart Disease. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(6):128646–128646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Enciso M, Sarasa J, Xanthopoulou L, Bristow S, Bowles M, Fragouli E, Delhanty J, Wells D. Polymorphisms in the MTHFR gene influence embryo viability and the incidence of aneuploidy. Hum Genet. 2016;135(5):555–568. doi: 10.1007/s00439-016-1652-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Guo Q, Wang L, Liu Z, Wang H, Wang L, Long J, Liao S. Different effects of maternal homocysteine concentration, MTHFR and MTRR genetic polymorphisms on the occurrence of fetal aneuploidy. Reprod Biomed Online. 2022;45(6):1207–1215. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.06.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Ginani CTA, Luz JRD Da, Medeiros K S De, Sarmento ACA, Coppedè F, Almeida M Das Graças. Association of C677T and A1298C polymorphisms of the MTHFR gene with maternal risk for Down syndrome: A meta-analysis of case-control studies. Mutat Res Mutat Res. 2023;792:108470–108470. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2023.108470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Lim K K, Teo H Y, Tan Y Y, Zeng Y B, Lam UTF, Choolani M, Chen E S. Fission Yeast Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase Ensures Mitotic and Meiotic Chromosome Segregation Fidelity. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(2):639–639. doi: 10.3390/ijms22020639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Hu G, Wade P A. NuRD and Pluripotency: A Complex Balancing Act. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;10(5):497–503. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2012.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Pegoraro G, Kubben N, Wickert U, Göhler H, Hoffmann K, Misteli T. Ageing-related chromatin defects through loss of the NURD complex. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11(10):1261–1267. doi: 10.1038/ncb1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Lai A Y, Wade P A. Cancer biology and NuRD: a multifaceted chromatin remodelling complex. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11(8):588–596. doi: 10.1038/nrc3091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Boulasiki P, Tan X W, Spinelli M, Riccio A. The NuRD Complex in Neurodevelopment and Disease: A Case of Sliding Doors. Cells. 2023;12(8):1179–1179. doi: 10.3390/cells12081179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Job G, Brugger C, Xu T, Lowe B R, Pfister Y, Qu C, Shanker S, Sanz J I Baños, Partridge J F, Schalch T. SHREC Silences Heterochromatin via Distinct Remodeling and Deacetylation Modules. Mol Cell. 2016;62(2):207–221. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Maksimov V, Oya E, Tanaka M, Kawaguchi T, Hachisuka A, Ekwall K, Bjerling P, Nakayama J. The binding of Chp2’s chromodomain to methylated H3K9 is essential for Chp2’s role in heterochromatin assembly in fission yeast. PLOS ONE. 2018;13(8):201101–201101. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Leopold K, Stirpe A, Schalch T. Transcriptional gene silencing requires dedicated interaction between HP1 protein Chp2 and chromatin remodeler Mit1. Genes Dev. 2019;33(9):565–577. doi: 10.1101/gad.320440.118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Sun L, Liu X, Li W, Yi Y, He X, Wang Y, Jin Q. Molecular chaperone Hsp90 regulates heterochromatin assembly through stabilizing multiple complexes in fission yeast. J Cell Sci. 2020;133(13) doi: 10.1242/jcs.244863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Wei Y, Lee N N, Pan L, Dhakshnamoorthy J, Sun L-L, Zofall M, Wheeler D, Grewal SIS. TOR targets an RNA processing network to regulate facultative heterochromatin, developmental gene expression and cell proliferation. Nat Cell Biol. 2021;23(3):243–256. doi: 10.1038/s41556-021-00631-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Soh YQS, Mikedis M M, Kojima M, Godfrey A K, Rooij D G De, Page D C. Meioc maintains an extended meiotic prophase I in mice. PLOS Genet. 2017;13(4):1006704–1006704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Wojtas M N, Pandey R R, Mendel M, Homolka D, Sachidanandam R, Pillai R S. Regulation of m6A Transcripts by the 3ʹ→5ʹ RNA Helicase YTHDC2 Is Essential for a Successful Meiotic Program in the Mammalian Germline. Mol Cell. 2017;68(2):374–387. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.09.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Jain D, Puno M R, Meydan C, Lailler N, Mason C E, Lima C D, Anderson K V, Keeney S. ketu mutant mice uncover an essential meiotic function for the ancient RNA helicase YTHDC2. eLife. 2018;7:e30919–30919. doi: 10.7554/eLife.30919. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Buitrago D, Labrador M, Arcon J P, Lema R, Flores O, Esteve-Codina A, Blanc J, Villegas N, Bellido D, Gut M, Dans P D, Heath S C, Gut I G, Heath I Brun, Orozco M. Impact of DNA methylation on 3D genome structure. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):3243–3243. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23142-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Laufer V A, Glover T W, Te Wilson. Applications of advanced technologies for detecting genomic structural variation. Mutat Res Mutat Res. 2023;792:108475–108475. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2023.108475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Wang X, Deng H, Lin J, Zhang K, Ni J, Li L, G Fan. Distinct roles of telomerase activity in age-related chronic diseases: An update literature review. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;167:115553–115553. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Price C, Boltz K A, Chaiken M F, Stewart J A, Beilstein M A, Shippen D E. Evolution of CST function in telomere maintenance. Cell Cycle. 2010;9(16):3177–3185. doi: 10.4161/cc.9.16.12547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Chen Y. The structural biology of the shelterin complex. Biol Chem. 2019;400(4):457–466. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2018-0368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Lim C J, Cech T R. Shaping human telomeres: from shelterin and CST complexes to telomeric chromatin organization. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2021;22(4):283–298. doi: 10.1038/s41580-021-00328-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Miyoshi T, Kanoh J, Saito M, Ishikawa F. Fission Yeast Pot1-Tpp1 Protects Telomeres and Regulates Telomere Length. Science. 2008;320(5881):1341–1344. doi: 10.1126/science.1154819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Kim J-K, Liu J, Hu X, Yu C, Roskamp K, Sankaran B, Huang L, Komives E A, Qiao F. Structural Basis for Shelterin Bridge Assembly. Mol Cell. 2017;68(4):698–714. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.10.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Yadav R K, Matsuda A, Lowe B R, Hiraoka Y, Partridge J F. Subtelomeric Chromatin in the. Fission Yeast S. pombe. Microorganisms. 2021;9(9):1977–1977. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9091977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Kanoh J. Roles of Specialized Chromatin and DNA Structures at Subtelomeres in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Biomolecules. 2023;13(5):810–810. doi: 10.3390/biom13050810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Mizuguchi T, Taneja N, Matsuda E, Belton J-M, Fitzgerald P, Dekker J, Grewal SIS. Shelterin components mediate genome reorganization in response to replication stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2017;114(21):5479–5484. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1705527114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Pan L, Tormey D, Bobon N, Baumann P. Rap1 prevents fusions between long telomeres in fission yeast. EMBO J. 2022;41(20):110458–110458. doi: 10.15252/embj.2021110458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Vaurs M, Naiman K, Bouabboune C, Rai S, Ptasińska K, Rives M, Matmati S, Carr A M, Géli V, Coulon S. Stn1-Ten1 and Taz1 independently promote replication of subtelomeric fragile sequences in fission yeast. Cell Rep. 2023;42(6):112537–112537. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Irie H, Yamamoto I, Tarumoto Y, Tashiro S, Runge K W, Ishikawa F. Telomere-binding proteins Taz1 and Rap1 regulate DSB repair and suppress gross chromosomal rearrangements in fission yeast. PLOS Genet. 2019;15(8):1008335–1008335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Gu P, Wang Y, Bisht K K, Wu L, Kukova L, Smith E M, Xiao Y, Bailey S M, Lei M, Nandakumar J, S Chang. Pot1 OB-fold mutations unleash telomere instability to initiate tumorigenesis. Oncogene. 2017;36(14):1939–1951. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Zheng J-T, Lin C-X, Fang Z-Y, H-D Li. Intron Retention as a Mode for RNA-Seq Data Analysis. Front Genet. 2020;11:586–586. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Boycott K M, et al. The Canadian Rare Diseases Models and Mechanisms (RDMM) Network: Connecting Understudied Genes to Model Organisms. Am J Hum Genet. 2020;106(2):143–152. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Cervelli T, Galli A. Yeast as a Tool to Understand the Significance of Human Disease-Associated Gene Variants. Genes. 2021;12(9):1303–1303. doi: 10.3390/genes12091303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Laval F, Coppin G, Twizere J-C, Vidal M. Homo cerevisiae-Leveraging Yeast for Investigating Protein-Protein Interactions and Their Role in Human Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(11):9179–9179. doi: 10.3390/genes12091303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Gastelum S, Michael A F, Bolger T A. Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a research tool for RNA -mediated human disease. WIREs RNA. 2024;15(1):1814–1814. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Fields S, Song O. A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature. 1989;340(6230):245–246. doi: 10.1038/340245a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Mehla J, Caufield J H, Uetz P. The Yeast Two-Hybrid System: A Tool for Mapping Protein-Protein Interactions. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2015;2015(5) doi: 10.1101/pdb.top083345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Varberg J M, Gardner J M, Mccroskey S, Saravanan S, Bradford W D, Jaspersen S I. High-Throughput Identification of Nuclear Envelope Protein Interactions in Schizosaccharomyces pombe Using an Arrayed Membrane Yeast-Two Hybrid Library. G3 GenesGenomesGenetics. 2020;10(12):4649–4663. doi: 10.1534/g3.120.401880. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Zhou Y, Liu Y, Gupta S, Paramo M I, Hou Y, Mao C, Luo Y, Judd J, Wierbowski S, Bertolotti M, Nerkar M, Jehi L, Drayman N, Nicolaescu V, Gula H, Tay S, Randall G, Wang P, Lis J T, Feschotte C, Erzurum S C, Cheng F, Yu H. A comprehensive SARS-CoV-2-human protein-protein interactome reveals COVID-19 pathobiology and potential host therapeutic targets. Nat Biotechnol. 2023;41(1):128–139. doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01474-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Takegawa K, Tohda H, Sasaki M, Idiris A, Ohashi T, Mukaiyama H, Giga-Hama Y, Kumagai H. Production of heterologous proteins using the fission-yeast ( Schizosaccharomyces pombe ) expression system. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2009;53(4):227–235. doi: 10.1042/BA20090048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Ohashi T, Nakakita S, Sumiyoshi W, Takegawa K. Production of heterologous glycoproteins by a glycosylation-defective alg3och1 mutant of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Biotechnol. 2010;150(3):348–356. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.09.942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Getz R A, Kwak G, Cornell S, Mbugua S, Eberhard J, Huang S X, Abbasi Z, Medeiros A S De, Thomas R, Bukowski B, Dranchak P K, Inglese J, Hoffman C S, C S. A fission yeast platform for heterologous expression of mammalian adenylyl cyclases and high throughput screening. Cell Signal. 2019;60:114–121. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2019.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Simm D, Popova B, Braus G H, Waack S, Kollmar M. Design of typical genes for heterologous gene expression. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):9625–9625. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13089-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Vo T V, Das J, Meyer M J, Cordero N A, Akturk N, Wei X, Fair B J, Degatano A G, Fragoza R, Liu L G, Matsuyama A, Trickey M, Horibata S, Grimson A, Yamano H, Yoshida M, Roth F P, Pleiss J A, Xia Y, H Yu. A Proteome-wide Fission Yeast Interactome Reveals Network Evolution Principles from Yeasts to. Human. Cell. 2016;164(1-2):310–323. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Yu H, et al. High-Quality Binary Protein Interaction Map of the Yeast Interactome Network. Science. 2008;322(5898):104–110. doi: 10.1126/science.1158684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Yu H, Tardivo L, Tam S, Weiner E, Gebreab F, Fan C, Svrzikapa N, Hirozane-Kishikawa T, Rietman E, Yang X, Sahalie J, Salehi-Ashtiani K, Hao T, Cusick M E, Hill D E, Roth F P, Braun P, Vidal M. Next-generation sequencing to generate interactome datasets. Nat Methods. 2011;8(6):478–480. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Rolland T. A Proteome-Scale Map of the Human Interactome Network. Cell. 2014;159(5):1212–1226. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.10.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Mcmurry J A, Köhler S, Washington N L, Balhoff J P, Borromeo C, Brush M, Carbon S, Conlin T, Dunn N, Engelstad M, Foster E, Gourdine J-P, Jacobsen J O, Keith D, Laraway B, Xuan J N, Shefchek K, Vasilevsky N A, Yuan Z, Lewis S E, Hochheiser H, Groza T, Smedley D, Robinson P N, Mungall C J, Haendel M A. Navigating the Phenotype Frontier: The Monarch Initiative. Genetics. 2016;203(4):1491–1495. doi: 10.1534/genetics.116.188870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Shefchek K A, et al. The Monarch Initiative in 2019: an integrative data and analytic platform connecting phenotypes to genotypes across species. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020;48(D1) doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Vasilevsky N A. Mondo: Unifying diseases for the world, by the world. Health Informatics. 2022
  117. Glingston R Sahaya, Yadav J, Rajpoot J, Joshi N, Nagotu S. Contribution of yeast models to virus research. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021;105(12):4855–4878. doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11331-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Zhao Y, Elder R T, Chen M, Cao J. Fission Yeast Expression Vectors Adapted for Positive Identification of Gene Insertion and Green Fluorescent Protein Fusion. BioTechniques. 1998;25(3):438–444. doi: 10.2144/98253st06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Zhao R Y. Yeast for virus research. Microbial Cell. 2017;4(10):311–330. doi: 10.15698/mic2017.10.592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. German Advisory Committee Blood (Arbeitskreis Blut), Subgroup ‘Assessment of Pathogens Transmissible by Blood’ Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV). . Transfus Med Hemotherapy . 2016;43(3):203–222. doi: 10.1159/000445852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Nkeze J, Li L, Benko Z, Li G, Zhao R Y. Molecular characterization of HIV-1 genome in fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Cell Biosci. 2015;5(1):47–47. doi: 10.1186/s13578-015-0037-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Zhao Y, Cao J, O’gorman M R, Yu M, Yogev R. Effect of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protein R (vpr) gene expression on basic cellular function of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Virol. 1996;70(9):5821–5826. doi: 10.1128/jvi.70.9.5821-5826.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Zhao Y, Yu M, Chen M, Elder R T, Yamamoto A, Cao J. Pleiotropic Effects of HIV-1 Protein R (Vpr) on Morphogenesis and Cell Survival in Fission Yeast and Antagonism by Pentoxifylline. Virology. 1998;246(2):266–276. doi: 10.1006/viro.1998.9208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Zhang C, Rasmussen C, Chang L-J. Cell Cycle Inhibitory Effects of HIV and SIV Vpr and Vpx in the Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Virology. 1997;230(1):103–112. doi: 10.1006/viro.1997.8459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Huard S, Chen M, Burdette K E, Fenyvuesvolgyi C, Yu M, Elder R T, Zhao R Y. HIV-1 Vpr-induced cell death in Schizosaccharomyces pombe is reminiscent of apoptosis. Cell Res. 2008;18(9):961–973. doi: 10.1038/cr.2008.272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Huard S, Elder R T, Liang D, Li G, Zhao R Y. Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Vpr Induces Cell Cycle G 2 Arrest through Srk1/MK2-Mediated Phosphorylation of Cdc25. J Virol. 2008;82(6):2904–2917. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01098-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Stromájer-Rácz T, Gazdag Z, Belágyi J, Vágvölgyi C, Zhao R Y, Pesti M. Oxidative stress induced by HIV-1 F34IVpr in Schizosaccharomyces pombe is one of its multiple functions. Exp Mol Pathol. 2010;88(1):38–44. doi: 10.1016/j.yexmp.2009.10.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Gazdag Z, Stromájer-Rácz T, Belagyi J, Zhao R Y, Elder R T, Virág E, Pesti M. Regulation of unbalanced redox homeostasis induced by the expression of wild-type HIV-1 viral protein R (NL4-3Vpr) in fission yeast. Acta Biol Hung. 2015;66(3):326–338. doi: 10.1556/018.66.2015.3.8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Li G, Elder R T, Dubrovsky L, Liang D, Pushkarsky T, Chiu K, Fan T, Sire J, Bukrinsky M, Zhao R Y. HIV-1 Replication through hHR23A-Mediated Interaction of Vpr with 26S Proteasome. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(6):11371–11371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Chen M, Elder R T, Yu M, O’gorman M G, L Selig L, R Benarous, Yamamoto A, Zhao Y. Mutational Analysis of Vpr-Induced G 2 Arrest, Nuclear Localization, and Cell Death in Fission Yeast. J Virol. 1999;73(4):3236–3245. doi: 10.1128/JVI.73.4.3236-3245.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Elder R T, Yu M, Chen M, Edelson S, Zhao Y. Cell cycle G2 arrest induced by HIV-1 Vpr in fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe) is independent of cell death and early genes in the DNA damage checkpoint. Virus Res. 2000;68(2):161–173. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1702(00)00167-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Elder R T, Yu M, Chen M, Zhu X, Yanagida M, Zhao Y. HIV-1 Vpr Induces Cell Cycle G2 Arrest in Fission Yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe) through a Pathway Involving Regulatory and Catalytic Subunits of PP2A and Acting on Both Wee1 and Cdc25. Virology. 2001;287(2):359–370. doi: 10.1006/viro.2001.1007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Masuda M, Nagai Y, Oshima N, Tanaka K, Murakami H, Igarashi H, Okayama H. Genetic Studies with the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe Suggest Involvement of Wee1, Ppa2, and Rad24 in Induction of Cell Cycle Arrest by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Vpr. J Virol. 2000;74(6):2636–2646. doi: 10.1128/JVI.74.6.2636-2646.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Benko Z, Liang D, Agbottah E, Hou J, Chiu K, Yu M, Innis S, Reed P, Kabat W, Elder R T, Marzio P Di, Taricani L, Ratner L, Young P G, Bukrinsky M, Zhao R Y. Anti-Vpr Activity of a Yeast Chaperone Protein. J Virol. 1920;78:11016–11029. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.20.11016-11029.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Benko Z, Liang D, Agbottah E, Hou J, Taricani L, Young P G, Bukrinsky M, Zhao R Y. Antagonistic interaction of HIV-1 Vpr with Hsf-mediated cellular heat shock response and Hsp16 in fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe) Retrovirology. 2007;4(1):16–16. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-4-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Antal J, Pesti M. The dose-dependent H2O2 stress response promotes increased survival for Schizosaccharomyces pombe cells expressing HIV-1 Vpr. Folia Microbiol. 2006;51(5):406–412. doi: 10.1007/BF02931584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Benko Z, Elder R T, Liang D, Zhao R Y. Fission yeast as a HTS platform for molecular probes of HIV-1 Vpr-induced cell death. Int J High Throughput Screen. 2010;1:151–162. doi: 10.2147/IJHTS.S12969. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  138. Macreadie I G, Thorburn D R, Kirby D M, Castelli L A, Rozario N L De, Azad A A. HIV-1 protein Vpr causes gross mitochondrial dysfunction in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 1997;410(2-3):145–149. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(97)00542-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Yao X-J, Rougeau N, Ghislaine D, Lemay J, Cohen É A. Analysis of HIV-1 Vpr determinants responsible for cell growth arrest in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Retrovirology. 2004;1(1):21–21. doi: 10.1186/1742-4690-1-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Dinh N, Bonnefoy N. Schizosaccharomyces pombe as a fundamental model for research on mitochondrial gene expression: Progress, achievements and outlooks. IUBMB Life. 2024;76(7):397–419. doi: 10.1002/iub.2801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Scheckel C, Aguzzi A. Prions, prionoids and protein misfolding disorders. Nat Rev Genet. 2018;19(7):405–418. doi: 10.1038/s41576-018-0011-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Liebman S W, Chernoff Y O. Prions in Yeast. Genetics. 2012;191(4) doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.137760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Wickner R B, Shewmaker F P, Bateman D A, Edskes H K, Gorkovskiy A, Dayani Y, Bezsonov E E. Yeast Prions: Structure, Biology, and Prion-Handling Systems. 2015;79:1–17. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00041-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  144. Harrison P M, Gerstein M. A method to assess compositional bias in biological sequences and its application to prion-like glutamine/asparagine-rich domains in eukaryotic proteomes. Genome Biol. 2003;4(6):40–40. doi: 10.1186/gb-2003-4-6-r40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  145. Sideri T, Yashiroda Y, Ellis D, Rodriguez-Lopez M, Yoshida M, Tuite M, Bahler J. The copper transport-associated protein Ctr4 can form prion-like epigenetic determinants in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Microbial Cell. 2017;4(1):16–28. doi: 10.15698/mic2017.01.552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  146. Hayles J. S. pombe placed on the prion map. Microbial Cell. 2017;4(2):35–37. doi: 10.15698/mic2017.02.555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  147. Sénéchal P, Arseneault G, Leroux A, Lindquist S, Rokeach L A. The Schizosaccharomyces pombe Hsp104 Disaggregase Is Unable to Propagate the. PSI+] Prion. PLoS ONE. 2009;4(9):6939–6939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  148. Reidy M, Sharma R, Masison D C. Schizosaccharomyces pombe Disaggregation Machinery Chaperones Support Saccharomyces cerevisiae Growth and Prion Propagation. Eukaryot Cell. 2013;12(5):739–745. doi: 10.1128/EC.00301-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  149. Sipiczki M. Phylogenesis of fission yeasts. Contradictions surrounding the origin of a century old genus. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1995;68(2):119–149. doi: 10.1007/BF00873099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  150. Aoki K, Furuya K, H Niki H. Schizosaccharomyces japonicus: A Distinct Dimorphic Yeast among the Fission Yeasts. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2017;2017(12) doi: 10.1101/pdb.top082651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  151. Russell J J, Theriot J A, Sood P, Marshall W F, Landweber L F, Fritz-Laylin L, Polka J K, Oliferenko S, Gerbich T, Gladfelter A, Umen J, Bezanilla M, Lancaster M A, He S, Gibson M C, Goldstein B, Tanaka E M, Hu C-K, Brunet A. Non-model model organisms. BMC Biol. 2017;15(1):55–55. doi: 10.1186/s12915-017-0391-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  152. Sipiczki M, Takeo K, Yamaguchi M, Yoshida S, Miklos I. Environmentally controlled dimorphic cycle in a fission yeast. Microbiology. 1998;144(5):1319–1330. doi: 10.1099/00221287-144-5-1319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  153. Sipiczki M, Takeo K, Grallert A. Growth polarity transitions in a dimorphic fission yeast. Microbiology. 1998;144(12):3475–3485. doi: 10.1099/00221287-144-12-3475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  154. Enczi K, Yamaguchi M, Sipiczki M. Morphology transition genes in the dimorphic fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces japonicus. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2007;92(2):143–154. doi: 10.1007/s10482-007-9142-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  155. Furuya K, Niki H. The DNA Damage Checkpoint Regulates a Transition between Yeast and Hyphal Growth in Schizosaccharomyces japonicus. Mol Cell Biol. 2010;30(12):2909–2917. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00049-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  156. Furuya K, Niki H. Hyphal differentiation induced via a DNA damage checkpoint-dependent pathway engaged in crosstalk with nutrient stress signaling in Schizosaccharomyces japonicus. Curr Genet. 2012;58(5-6):291–303. doi: 10.1007/s00294-012-0384-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  157. Papp L, Sipiczki M, Holb I J, Miklós I. Optimal conditions for mycelial growth of Schizosaccharomyces japonicus cells in liquid medium: it enables the molecular investigation of dimorphism. Yeast. 2014;31(12):475–482. doi: 10.1002/yea.3048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  158. Kinnaer C, Dudin O, Martin S G. Yeast-to-hypha transition of Schizosaccharomyces japonicus in response to environmental stimuli. Mol Biol Cell. 2019;30(8):975–991. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E18-12-0774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  159. Gómez-Gil E, Franco A, Madrid M, Vázquez-Marín B, Gacto M, Fernández-Breis J, Vicente-Soler J, Soto T, Cansado J. Quorum sensing and stress-activated MAPK signaling repress yeast to hypha transition in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces japonicus. PLOS Genet. 2019;15(5):1008192–1008192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  160. Papp L A, Ács-Szabó L, Póliska S, Miklós I. A modified culture medium and hyphae isolation method can increase quality of the RNA extracted from mycelia of a dimorphic fungal species. Curr Genet. 2021;67(5):823–830. doi: 10.1007/s00294-021-01181-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  161. Braun B R. NRG1, a repressor of filamentous growth in C. albicans, is down-regulated during filament induction. EMBO J. 2001;20(17):4753–4761. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.17.4753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  162. Murad AMA. NRG1 represses yeast-hypha morphogenesis and hypha-specific gene expression in Candida albicans. EMBO J. 2001;20(17):4742–4752. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.17.4742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  163. Biswas K, Morschhäuser J. The Mep2p ammonium permease controls nitrogen starvation-induced filamentous growth in Candida albicans. Mol Microbiol. 2005;56(3):649–669. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04576.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  164. Nozaki S, Furuya K, Niki H. The Ras1-Cdc42 pathway is involved in hyphal development of Schizosaccharomyces japonicus. FEMS Yeast Res. 2018;18(4) doi: 10.1093/femsyr/foy031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  165. Okamoto S, Furuya K, Nozaki S, Aoki K, Niki H. Synchronous Activation of Cell Division by Light or Temperature Stimuli in the Dimorphic Yeast Schizosaccharomyces japonicus. Eukaryot Cell. 2013;12(9):1235–1243. doi: 10.1128/EC.00109-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  166. Amoah-Buahin E, Bone N, Armstrong J. Hyphal Growth in the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Eukaryot Cell. 2005;4(7):1287–1297. doi: 10.1128/EC.4.7.1287-1297.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  167. Dodgson J, Avula H, Hoe K-L, Kim D-U, Park H-O, Hayles J, J Armstrong. Functional Genomics of Adhesion, Invasion, and Mycelial Formation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Eukaryot Cell. 2009;8(8):1298–1306. doi: 10.1128/EC.00078-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  168. Prevorovský M, Stanurová J, Půta F, Folk P. High environmental iron concentrations stimulate adhesion and invasive growth of Schizosaccharomyces pombe. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009;293(1):130–134. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01515.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  169. Dodgson J, Brown W, Rosa C A, Armstrong J. Reorganization of the Growth Pattern of Schizosaccharomyces pombe in Invasive Filament Formation. Eukaryot Cell. 2010;9(11):1788–1797. doi: 10.1128/EC.00084-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  170. Matsuzawa T, Morita T, Tanaka N, Tohda H, Takegawa K. Identification of a galactose-specific flocculin essential for non-sexual flocculation and filamentous growth in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Mol Microbiol. 2011;82(6):1531–1544. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07908.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  171. Sasaki Y, Kojima A, Shibata Y, Mitsuzawa H. Filamentous invasive growth of mutants of the genes encoding ammonia-metabolizing enzymes in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(10):186028–186028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  172. Sazer S. Nuclear Envelope: Nuclear Pore Complexity. Curr Biol. 2005;15(1):23–26. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2004.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  173. Aoki K, Hayashi H, Furuya K, Sato M, Takagi T, Osumi M, Kimura A, Niki H. Breakage of the nuclear envelope by an extending mitotic nucleus occurs during anaphase in Schizosaccharomyces japonicus. Genes Cells. 2011;16(9):911–926. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2011.01540.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  174. Yam C, Gu Y, Oliferenko S. Partitioning and Remodeling of the Schizosaccharomyces japonicus Mitotic Nucleus Require Chromosome Tethers. Curr Biol. 2013;23(22):2303–2310. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.09.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  175. Gu Y, Yam C, Oliferenko S. Divergence of mitotic strategies in fission yeasts. Nucleus. 2012;3(3):220–225. doi: 10.4161/nucl.19514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  176. Aoki K, Shiwa Y, Takada H, Yoshikawa H, H Niki. Regulation of nuclear envelope dynamics via APC /C is necessary for the progression of semi-open mitosis in Schizosaccharomyces japonicus. Genes Cells. 2013;18(9):733–752. doi: 10.1111/gtc.12072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  177. Gu Y, Oliferenko S. Comparative biology of cell division in the fission yeast clade. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2015;28:18–25. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2015.07.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  178. Moseley J B. Cytokinesis: Does Mid1 Have an Identity Crisis? Curr Biol. 2015;25(9):364–366. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.03.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  179. Makarova M, Gu Y, Chen J-S, Beckley J R, Gould K L, Oliferenko S. Temporal Regulation of Lipin Activity Diverged to Account for Differences in Mitotic Programs. Curr Biol. 2016;26(2):237–243. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  180. Yasuda T, Takaine M, Numata O, Nakano K. Anillin-related protein Mid1 regulates timely formation of the contractile ring in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces japonicus. Genes Cells. 2016;21(6):594–607. doi: 10.1111/gtc.12368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  181. Aoki K, Niki H. Release of condensin from mitotic chromosomes requires the Ran-GTP gradient in the reorganized nucleus. Biol Open . 2017;6(11):1614–1628. doi: 10.1242/bio.027193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  182. Chew T G, Huang J, Palani S, Sommese R, Kamnev A, Hatano T, Gu Y, Oliferenko S, Sivaramakrishnan S, Balasubramanian M K. Actin turnover maintains actin filament homeostasis during cytokinetic ring contraction. J Cell Biol. 2017;216(9):2657–2667. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201701104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  183. Papp L, Sipiczki M, Miklós I. Expression pattern and phenotypic characterization of the mutant strain reveals target genes and processes regulated by pka1 in the dimorphic fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces japonicus. Curr Genet. 2017;63(3):487–497. doi: 10.1007/s00294-016-0651-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  184. Pieper G H, Sprenger S, Teis D, Oliferenko S. ESCRT-III/Vps4 Controls Heterochromatin-Nuclear Envelope Attachments. Dev Cell. 2020;53(1):27–41. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.01.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  185. Lee I-J, Stokasimov E, Dempsey N, Varberg J M, Jacob E, Jaspersen S L, Pellmann D. Factors promoting nuclear envelope assembly independent of the canonical ESCRT pathway. J Cell Biol. 2020;219(6):201908232–201908232. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201908232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  186. Gómez-Gil E, Martín-García R, Vicente-Soler J, Franco A, Vázquez-Marín B, Prieto-Ruiz F, Soto T, Pérez P, Madrid M, Cansado J. Stress-activated MAPK signaling controls fission yeast actomyosin ring integrity by modulating formin For3 levels. . eLife. 2020;9:e57951–57951. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  187. Gómez-Gil E, Franco A, Vázquez-Marín B, Prieto-Ruiz F, Pérez-Díaz A, Vicente-Soler J, Madrid M, Soto T, Cansado J. Specific Functional Features of the Cell Integrity MAP Kinase Pathway in the Dimorphic Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces japonicus. J Fungi. 2021;7(6):482–482. doi: 10.3390/jof7060482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  188. Gu Y, Yam C, Oliferenko S. Rewiring of Cellular Division Site Selection in Evolution of Fission Yeasts. Curr Biol. 2015;25(9):1187–1194. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.02.056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  189. Chapman E, Taglini F, Bayne E H. Separable roles for RNAi in regulation of transposable elements and viability in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces japonicus. PLOS Genet. 2022;18(2):1010100–1010100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  190. Bernstein E, Kim S Y, Carmell M A, Murchison E P, Alcorn H, Li M Z, Mills A A, Elledge S J, Anderson K V, Hannon G J. Dicer is essential for mouse development. Nat Genet. 2003;35(3):215–217. doi: 10.1038/ng1253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  191. Liu J, Carmell M A, Rivas F V, Marsden C G, Thomson J M, Song J-J, Hammond S M, Joshua-Tor L, Hannon G J. Argonaute2 Is the Catalytic Engine of Mammalian RNAi. Science. 2004;305(5689):1437–1441. doi: 10.1126/science.1102513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  192. Smurova K, Wulf P De. Centromere and Pericentromere Transcription: Roles and Regulation … in Sickness and in Health. Front Genet. 2018;9:674–674. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2018.00674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  193. Upadhyay U, Srivastava S, Khatri I, Nanda J S, Subramanian S, Arora A, Singh J. Ablation of RNA interference and retrotransposons accompany acquisition and evolution of transposases to heterochromatin protein CENPB. Mol Biol Cell. 2017;28(8):1132–1146. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e16-07-0485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  194. Fukunaga T, Tanaka N, Furumoto T, Nakakita S, Ohashi T, Higuchi Y, Maekawa H, Takegawa K. Characterization of N- and O-linked galactosylated oligosaccharides from fission yeast species. J Biosci Bioeng. 2020;130(2):128–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2020.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  195. Fukunaga T, Ohashi T, Tanaka Y, Yoshimatsu T, Higuchi Y, Maekawa H, Takegawa K. Galactosylation of cell-surface glycoprotein required for hyphal growth and cell wall integrity in Schizosaccharomyces japonicus. J Biosci Bioeng. 2022;134(5):384–392. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2022.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  196. Bulder CJEA. Anaerobic growth, ergosterol content and sensitivity to a polyene antibiotic, of the yeast Schizosaccharomyces japonicus. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1971;37(1):353–358. doi: 10.1007/BF02218505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  197. Bulder CJEA, Weijers C. Absence of cyanide-insensitive respiration in Schizosaccharomyces japonicus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1982;15(2):145–147. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1982.tb00056.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  198. Kaino T, Tonoko K, Mochizuki S, Takashima Y, Kawamukai M. Schizosaccharomyces japonicus has low levels of CoQ10 synthesis, respiration deficiency, and efficient ethanol production. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2018;82(6):1031–1042. doi: 10.1080/09168451.2017.1401914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  199. Bouwknegt J, Wiersma S J, Ortiz-Merino R A, Doornenbal Esr, Buitenhuis P, Giera M, Müller C, Pronk J T. A squalene-hopene cyclase in Schizosaccharomyces japonicus represents a eukaryotic adaptation to sterol-limited anaerobic environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2021;118(32) doi: 10.1073/pnas.2105225118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  200. Alam S, Gu Y, Reichert P, Bähler J, Oliferenko S. Optimization of energy production and central carbon metabolism in a non-respiring eukaryote. Curr Biol. 2023;33(11):2175–2186. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.04.046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  201. Ackerman D, Simon M C. Hypoxia, lipids, and cancer: surviving the harsh tumor microenvironment. Trends Cell Biol. 2014;24(8):472–478. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2014.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  202. Makarova M, Peter M, Balogh G, Glatz A, Macrae J I, Mora N Lopez, Booth P, Makeyev E, Vigh L, Oliferenko S. Delineating the Rules for Structural Adaptation of Membrane-Associated Proteins to Evolutionary Changes in Membrane Lipidome. Curr Biol. 2020;30(3):367–380. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.11.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  203. Panconi L, Lorenz C D, May R C, Owen D M, Makarova M. Phospholipid tail asymmetry allows cellular adaptation to anoxic environments. J Biol Chem. 2023;299(9):105134–105134. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.105134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  204. Rajeh A, Lv J, Lin Z. Heterogeneous rates of genome rearrangement contributed to the disparity of species richness in Ascomycota. BMC Genomics. 2018;19(1):282–282. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4683-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  205. Tanaka K, Hirata A. Ascospore development in the fission yeasts Schizosaccharomyces pombe and S. japonicus. J Cell Sci. 1982;56(1):263–279. doi: 10.1242/jcs.56.1.263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  206. Alfa C E, Hyams J S. Distribution of tubulin and actin through the cell division cycle of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces japonicus var. versatilis: a comparison with Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Cell Sci. 1990;96(1):71–77. doi: 10.1242/jcs.96.1.71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  207. Bullerwell C E. A comparison of three fission yeast mitochondrial genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31(2):759–768. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  208. Linder T, Gustafsson C M. Molecular phylogenetics of ascomycotal adhesins-A novel family of putative cell-surface adhesive proteins in fission yeasts. Fungal Genet Biol. 2008;45(4):485–497. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2007.08.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  209. Xu J, Yanagisawa Y, Tsankov A M, Hart C, Aoki K, Kommajosyula N, Steinmann K E, Bochicchio J, Russ C, Regev A, Rando O J, Nusbaum C, Niki H, Milos P, Weng Z, Rhind N. Genome-wide identification and characterization of replication origins by deep sequencing. Genome Biol. 2012;13(4):27–27. doi: 10.1186/gb-2012-13-4-r27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  210. Balazs A, Batta G, Miklos I, Acs-Szabo L, Aldana C R Vazquez De, Sipiczki M. Conserved regulators of the cell separation process in Schizosaccharomyces. Fungal Genet Biol. 2012;49(3):235–249. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2012.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  211. Ichikawa Y, Kagawa W, Saito K, Chikashige Y, Haraguchi T, Hiraoka Y, Kurumizaka H. Purification and characterization of the fission yeast telomere clustering factors, Bqt1 and Bqt2. Protein Expr Purif. 2013;88(2):207–213. doi: 10.1016/j.pep.2013.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  212. Guo Y, Singh P K, Levin H I. A long terminal repeat retrotransposon of Schizosaccharomyces japonicus integrates upstream of RNA pol III transcribed genes. Mob DNA. 2015;6(1):19–19. doi: 10.1186/s13100-015-0048-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  213. Huang J, Chew T G, Gu Y, Palani S, Kamnev A, Martin D S, Carter N J, Cross R A, Oliferenko S, Balasubramanian M K. Curvature-induced expulsion of actomyosin bundles during cytokinetic ring contraction. eLife. 2016;5:e21383–e21383. doi: 10.7554/eLife.21383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  214. Domizio P, Liu Y, Bisson L F, Barile D. Cell wall polysaccharides released during the alcoholic fermentation by Schizosaccharomyces pombe and S. japonicus: quantification and characterization. Food Microbiol. 2017;61:136–149. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2016.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  215. Princová J, Schätz M, Ťupa O, Převorovský M. Analysis of Lipid Droplet Content in Fission and Budding Yeasts using Automated Image Processing. J Vis Exp. 2019;(149):59889–59889. doi: 10.3791/59889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  216. Gu Y, Alam S, Oliferenko S. Peroxisomal compartmentalization of amino acid biosynthesis reactions imposes an upper limit on compartment size. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):5544–5544. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41347-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  217. Linder S, Cervero P, Eddy R, Condeelis J. Mechanisms and roles of podosomes and invadopodia. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2023;24(2):86–106. doi: 10.1038/s41580-022-00530-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  218. Vaškovičová K, Žárský V, Rösel D, Nikolič M, Buccione R, Cvrčková F, Brábek J. Invasive cells in animals and plants: searching for LECA machineries in later eukaryotic life. Biol Direct. 2013;8(1):8–8. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-8-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  219. Beaty B T, Condeelis J. Digging a little deeper: The stages of invadopodium formation and maturation. Eur J Cell Biol. 2014;93(10-12):438–444. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2014.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  220. Revach O-Y, Weiner A, Rechav K, Sabanay I, Livne A, Geiger B. Mechanical interplay between invadopodia and the nucleus in cultured cancer cells. Sci Rep. 2015;5(1):9466–9466. doi: 10.1038/srep09466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  221. Jacob A, Prekeris R. The regulation of MMP targeting to invadopodia during cancer metastasis. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2015;3 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2015.00004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  222. Johansen J, Alfaro G, Beh C T. Polarized Exocytosis Induces Compensatory Endocytosis by Sec4p-Regulated Cortical Actin Polymerization. PLOS Biol. 2016;14(8):1002534–1002534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  223. Zeng J, Feng S, Wu B, Guo W. Polarized Exocytosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2017;9(12):27870–27870. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a027870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  224. Augoff K, Hryniewicz-Jankowska A, Tabola R. Invadopodia: clearing the way for cancer cell invasion. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8(14):902–902. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.02.157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  225. Luo Y, Hu J, Liu Y, Li L, Li Y, Sun B, Kong R. Invadopodia: A potential target for pancreatic cancer therapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021;159:103236–103236. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  226. Epp E, Walther A, Lépine G, Leon Z, Mullick A, Raymond M, Wendland J, Whiteway M. Forward genetics in Candida albicans that reveals the Arp2/3 complex is required for hyphal formation, but not endocytosis. Mol Microbiol. 2010;75(5):1182–1198. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.07038.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  227. Xie Y, Loh Z Y, Xue J, Zhou F, Sun J, Qiao Z, Jin S, Deng Y, Li H, Wang Y, Lu L, Gao Y, Miao Y. Orchestrated actin nucleation by the Candida albicans polarisome complex enables filamentous growth. J Biol Chem. 2020;295(44):14840–14854. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.013890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  228. Feierbach B, F Chang. Roles of the fission yeast formin for3p in cell polarity, actin cable formation and symmetric cell division. Curr Biol. 2001;11(21):1656–1665. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00525-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  229. Jeannot P, Besson A. Cortactin function in invadopodia. Small GTPases. 2020;11(4):256–270. doi: 10.1080/21541248.2017.1405773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  230. Lian Y, Wen D, Meng X, Wang X, Li H, Hao L, Xue H, Zhao J. Inhibition of invadopodia formation by diosgenin in tumor cells (Review) Oncol Lett. 2020;20(6):1–1. doi: 10.3892/ol.2020.12148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  231. Adnan M, Islam W, Waheed A, Hussain Q, Shen L, Wang J, Liu G. SNARE Protein Snc1 Is Essential for Vesicle Trafficking, Membrane Fusion and Protein Secretion in Fungi. Cells. 2023;12(11):1547–1547. doi: 10.3390/cells12111547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  232. Gorshtein G, Grafinger O, Coppolino M G. Targeting SNARE-Mediated Vesicle Transport to Block Invadopodium-Based Cancer Cell Invasion. Front Oncol. 2021;11:679955–679955. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.679955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  233. Martin-Urdiroz M, Deeks M J, Horton C G, Dawe H R, Jourdain I. The Exocyst Complex in Health and Disease. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2016;4 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2016.00024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  234. Naglik J R, Challacombe S J, Hube B. Candida albicans Secreted Aspartyl Proteinases in Virulence and Pathogenesis. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2003;67(3):400–428. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.67.3.400-428.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  235. Brand A. Hyphal Growth in Human Fungal Pathogens and Its Role in Virulence. Int J Microbiol. 2012;2012:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2012/517529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  236. Paz H, Pathak N, J Yang. Invading one step at a time: the role of invadopodia in tumor metastasis. Oncogene. 2014;33(33):4193–4202. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  237. Horssen R Van, Buccione R, Willemse M, Cingir S, Wieringa B, Attanasio F. Cancer cell metabolism regulates extracellular matrix degradation by invadopodia. Eur J Cell Biol. 2013;92(3):113–121. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2012.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  238. Palmer G E, Kelly M N, Sturtevant J E. The Candida albicans Vacuole Is Required for Differentiation and Efficient Macrophage Killing. Eukaryot Cell. 2005;4(10):1677–1686. doi: 10.1128/EC.4.10.1677-1686.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  239. Lee S A, Jones J, Hardison S, Kot J, Khalique Z, Bernardo S M, Lazzell A, Monteagudo C, J Lopez-Ribot. Candida albicans VPS4 is Required for Secretion of Aspartyl Proteases and In Vivo Virulence. Mycopathologia. 2009;167(2):55–63. doi: 10.1007/s11046-008-9155-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  240. Revach O-Y, Geiger B. The interplay between the proteolytic, invasive, and adhesive domains of invadopodia and their roles in cancer invasion. Cell Adhes Migr. 2014;8(3):215–225. doi: 10.4161/cam.27842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  241. Biswas S, Dijck P Van, Datta A. Environmental Sensing and Signal Transduction Pathways Regulating Morphopathogenic Determinants of Candida albicans. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2007;71(2):348–376. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00009-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  242. Gould C M, Courtneidge S A. Regulation of invadopodia by the tumor microenvironment. Cell Adhes Migr. 2014;8(3):226–235. doi: 10.4161/cam.28346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  243. Parekh A, Ruppender N S, Branch K M, Sewell-Loftin M K, Lin J, Boyer P D, Candiello J E, Merryman W D, Guelcher S A, Weaver A M. Sensing and Modulation of Invadopodia across a Wide Range of Rigidities. Biophys J. 2011;100(3):573–582. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.12.3733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  244. Elion E A, Brill J A, Fink G R. FUS3 represses CLN1 and CLN2 and in concert with KSS1 promotes signal transduction. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1991;88(21):9392–9396. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.21.9392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  245. Ralser M, Kuhl H, Ralser M, Werber M, Lehrach H, Breitenbach M, Timmermann B. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae W303-K6001 cross-platform genome sequence: insights into ancestry and physiology of a laboratory mutt. Open Biol. 2012;2(8):120093–120093. doi: 10.1098/rsob.120093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  246. Fantes P A, Hoffman C S. A Brief History of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Research: A Perspective Over the Past 70 Years. Genetics. 2016;203(2):621–629. doi: 10.1534/genetics.116.189407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  247. Jeffares D C. The natural diversity and ecology of fission yeast. Yeast. 2018;35(3):253–260. doi: 10.1002/yea.3293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  248. Krawchuk M D, Wahls W P. High-efficiency gene targeting in Schizosaccharomyces pombe using a modular, PCR-based approach with long tracts of flanking homology. Yeast. 1999;15(13):1419–1427. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19990930)15:13<1419::AID-YEA466>3.0.CO;2-Q. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  249. Matsuda A, Asakawa H, Haraguchi T, Hiraoka Y. Spatial organization of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe genome within the nucleus: Nuclear organisation in fission yeast. Yeast. 2017;34(2):55–66. doi: 10.1002/yea.3217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  250. Tanizawa H, Kim K-D, Iwasaki O, Noma K. Architectural alterations of the fission yeast genome during the cell cycle. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2017;24(11):965–976. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  251. Herrera-Camacho I Pilar, Millán-Pérez-Peña L, Sosa-Jurado F, Martínez-Montiel N, Martínez-Contreras R Débora, Murrieta N Hilda Rosas. Molecular Tools for Gene Analysis in Fission Yeast. In: Boldura O-M, Baltă C, N Sayed Awwad, editors. Anal. Tools - Methods Bio-Mol. Stud. IntechOpen; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  252. Torres-Garcia S, Pompeo L Di, Eivers L, Gaborieau B, White S A, Pidoux A L, Kanigowska P, Yaseen I, Cai Y, Allshire R C. SpEDIT: A fast and efficient CRISPR/Cas9 method for fission yeast. Wellcome Open Res. 2020;5:274–274. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16405.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  253. Varberg J M, Unruh J R, Bestul A J, Khan A A, Jaspersen S I. Quantitative analysis of nuclear pore complex organization in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Life Sci Alliance. 2022;5(7):202201423–202201423. doi: 10.26508/lsa.202201423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  254. Vo M, Kuo-Esser L, Dominguez M, Barta H, Graber M, Rausenberger A, Miller R, Sommer N, Escorcia W. Photo Phenosizer, a rapid machine learning-based method to measure cell dimensions in fission yeast. MicroPublication Biol. 2022 doi: 10.17912/micropub.biology.000620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  255. Grigaitis P, Grundel DAJ, Pelt-Kleinjan E Van, Isaku M, Xie G, Farias S Mendoza, Teusink B, Heerden J H Van. A Computational Toolbox to Investigate the Metabolic Potential and Resource Allocation in Fission Yeast. mSystems. 2022;7(4):423–445. doi: 10.1128/msystems.00423-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  256. Chen L, Ou L, Jing X, Kong Y, Xie B, Zhang N, Shi H, Qin H, Li X, Hao P. DeepEdit: single-molecule detection and phasing of A-to-I RNA editing events using nanopore direct RNA sequencing. Genome Biol. 2023;24(1):75–75. doi: 10.1186/s13059-023-02921-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  257. León-Periñán D, A Fernández-Álvarez. ChroMo, an Application for Unsupervised Analysis of Chromosome Movements in Meiosis. Cells. 2021;10(8):2013–2013. doi: 10.3390/cells10082013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  258. Uzsoy ASM, Zareiesfandabadi P, Jennings J, Kemper A F, Elting M W. Automated tracking of S. pombe spindle elongation dynamics. J Microsc. 2021;284(1):83–94. doi: 10.1111/jmi.13044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  259. Yang Y, Yan G, Kong S, Wu M, Yang P, Cao W, Qiao L. GproDIA enables data-independent acquisition glycoproteomics with comprehensive statistical control. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):6073–6073. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26246-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  260. Wang X, Xu R, Wang Y, Liu Z, Lou R, Sugiyama T. Yesprit and Yeaseq: Applications for designing primers and browsing sequences for research using the four Schizosaccharomyces species. Yeast. 2021;38(11):583–591. doi: 10.1002/yea.3660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  261. Rodríguez-López M, Bordin N, Lees J, Scholes H, Hassan S, Saintain Q, Kamrad S, Orengo C, Bähler J. Broad functional profiling of fission yeast proteins using phenomics and machine learning. . eLife. 2023;12:RP88229–RP88229. doi: 10.7554/eLife.88229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  262. Ohira M, Rhind N. pomBseen: An automated pipeline for analysis of fission yeast images. PLOS ONE. 2023;18(9):291391–291391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  263. Tasmia S A, Kibria MdK, Tuly K F, Islam MdA, Khatun M S, Hasan MdM, Mollah MdNH. Prediction of serine phosphorylation sites mapping on Schizosaccharomyces pombe by fusing three encoding schemes with the random forest classifier. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):2632–2632. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-06529-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  264. Teresa-Trueba I De, Goetz S K, Mattausch A, Stojanovska F, Zimmerli C E, Toro-Nahuelpan M, Cheng DWC, Tollervey F, Pape C, Beck M, Diz-Muñoz A, Kreshuk A, Mahamid J, Zaugg J B. Convolutional networks for supervised mining of molecular patterns within cellular context. Nat Methods. 2023;20(2):284–294. doi: 10.1038/s41592-022-01746-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  265. Poinsignon T, Gallopin M, Grognet P, Malagnac F, Lelandais G, Poulain P. 3D models of fungal chromosomes to enhance visual integration of omics data. NAR Genomics Bioinforma. 2023;5(4):104–104. doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqad104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  266. Teixeira M C, Viana R, Palma M, Oliveira J, Galocha M, Mota M N, Couceiro D, Pereira M G, Antunes M, Costa I V, Pais P, Parada C, Chaouiya C, Sá-Correia I, Monteiro P T. YEASTRACT+: a portal for the exploitation of global transcription regulation and metabolic model data in yeast biotechnology and pathogenesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51(D1):785–791. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  267. Hong X, Li N, Lv J, Zhang Y, Li J, Zhang J, Chen H-F. PTMint database of experimentally verified PTM regulation on protein-protein interaction. Bioinformatics. 2023;39(1):823–823. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  268. García-Ruano D, Hsu I, Leray B, Billard B, Liti G, Coudreuse D. Engineering heterothallic strains in fission yeast. Yeast. 2023;41(3):87–94. doi: 10.1002/yea.3914. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  269. Song X, Xu R, Sugiyama T. Two plasmid modules for introducing the auxin-inducible degron into the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe by PCR-based gene targeting. MicroPublication Biol. 2021 doi: 10.17912/micropub.biology.000442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  270. Li S, Toya M, Sato M. Simplification of nutritional conditions in transformation procedures for genome editing with the CRISPR/Cas9 system for fission yeast. Gene. 2021;784:145595–145595. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2021.145595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  271. Mitteaux J, Lejault P, Wojciechowski F, Joubert A, Boudon J, Desbois N, Gros C P, Hudson Rhe, Boulé J-B, Granzhan A, Monchaud D. Identifying G-Quadruplex-DNA-Disrupting Small Molecules. J Am Chem Soc. 2021;143(32):12567–12577. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c04426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  272. Okada H, Mactaggart B, Bi E. Analysis of local protein accumulation kinetics by live-cell imaging in yeast systems. STAR Protoc. 2021;2(3):100733–100733. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  273. Yu Z-Q, Liu X-M, Zhao D, Xu D-D, Du L-L. Visual detection of binary, ternary and quaternary protein interactions in fission yeast using a Pil1 co-tethering assay. J Cell Sci. 2019;134:258774–258774. doi: 10.1242/jcs.258774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  274. Sakai K, Kondo Y, Fujioka H, Kamiya M, Aoki K, Goto Y. Near-infrared imaging in fission yeast using a genetically encoded phycocyanobilin biosynthesis system. J Cell Sci. 2021;134(24):259315–259315. doi: 10.1242/jcs.259315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  275. Vachez L, Teste C, Vanoosthuyse V. DNA:RNA Immunoprecipitation from S. pombe Cells for qPCR and Genome-Wide Sequencing. In: Aguilera A, Ruzov A, editors. R-Loops. Springer US; New York, NY: 2022. pp. 411–428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  276. Larkin A, Ames A, Seman M, Ragunathan K. Investigating Mitotic Inheritance of Histone Modifications Using Tethering Strategies. In: R Margueron, D Holoch., editors. Histone Methyltransferases. Springer US; New York, NY: 2022. pp. 419–440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  277. Kianfard Z, Cheung K, Sabatinos S A. Cell Cycle Synchrony Methods for Fission Yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe. In: Z Wang ., editor. Cell-Cycle Synchronization. Springer US; New York, NY: 2022. pp. 169–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  278. Kianfard Z, Cheung K, Rappaport D, Magalage S P, Sabatinos S A. Detecting Cell Cycle Stage and Progression in Fission Yeast, Schizosaccharomyces pombe. . In: Z Wang., editor. Cell-Cycle Synchronization. Springer US; New York, NY: 2022. pp. 235–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  279. Hoffman C S. Use of a Fission Yeast Platform to Identify and Characterize Small Molecule PDE Inhibitors. Front Pharmacol. 2022;12:833156–833156. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.833156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  280. Kang Y, Bae S, An S, Lee J Y. Deciphering Molecular Mechanism of Histone Assembly by DNA Curtain Technique. J Vis Exp. 2022;(181):63501–63501. doi: 10.3791/63501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  281. Elías-Villalobos A, Duncan C, Mata J, Helmlinger D. Quantitative analysis of protein-RNA interactions in fission yeast. STAR Protoc. 2022;3(2):101373–101373. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  282. Lemière J, Chang F. Quantifying turgor pressure in budding and fission yeasts based upon osmotic properties. Mol Biol Cell. 2023;34(13):133–133. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E23-06-0215. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  283. Hebra T, Smrčková H, Elkatmis B, Převorovský M. POMBOX: A Fission Yeast Cloning Toolkit for Molecular and Synthetic Biology. ACS Synth Biol. 2024;13(2):558–567. doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.3c00529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  284. Matsuyama A, Hashimoto A, Nishimura S, Yoshida M. A set of vectors and strains for chromosomal integration in fission yeast. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):9295–9295. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36267-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  285. Ishikawa K, Soejima S, Masuda F, Saitoh S. Implementation of dCas9-mediated CRISPRi in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. G3 GenesGenomesGenetics. 2021;11(4):51–51. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  286. Ishikawa K, Soejima S, Saitoh S. Genetic knockdown of genes that are obscure, conserved and essential using CRISPR interference methods in the fission yeast S. pombe. J Cell Sci. 2023;136(9):261186–261186. doi: 10.1242/jcs.261186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  287. González-Martín E, Jiménez J, V A Tallada. BiFCo: visualizing cohesin assembly/disassembly cycle in living cells. Life Sci Alliance. 2023;6(7):202301945–202301945. doi: 10.26508/lsa.202301945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  288. Chen Z, Zheng S, Fu C. Shotgun knockdown of RNA by CRISPR-Cas13d in fission yeast. J Cell Sci. 2023;136(6):260769–260769. doi: 10.1242/jcs.260769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  289. Virant D, Vojnovic I, Winkelmeier J, Endesfelder M, Turkowyd B, Lando D, Endesfelder U. Unraveling the kinetochore nanostructure in Schizosaccharomyces pombe using multi-color SMLM imaging. J Cell Biol. 2023;222(4):202209096–202209096. doi: 10.1083/jcb.202209096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  290. García-Ruano D, Venkova L, Jain A, Ryan J C, Balasubramaniam V Radhakrishnan, Piel M, Coudreuse D. Fluorescence exclusion - a rapid, accurate and powerful method for measuring yeast cell volume. J Cell Sci. 2022;135(13):259392–259392. doi: 10.1242/jcs.259392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  291. Nakamura A, Goto Y, Sugiyama H, Tsukiji S, Aoki K. Chemogenetic Manipulation of Endogenous Proteins in Fission Yeast Using a Self-Localizing Ligand-Induced Protein Translocation System. ACS Chem Biol. 2023;18(12):2506–2515. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.3c00478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  292. Anrather D, Polakova S B, Cipak L, Gregan J. SILAC-Based Proteomic Analysis of Meiosis in the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. In: J L Luque-Garcia JL., editor. SILAC. Springer US; New York, NY: 2023. pp. 19–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  293. Duncan CDS, Mata J. Translation-complex profiling of fission yeast cells reveals dynamic rearrangements of scanning ribosomal subunits upon nutritional stress. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(22):13011–13025. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  294. Hatano T, Lim T C, Billault-Chaumartin I, Dhar A, Gu Y, Massam-Wu T, Scott W, Adishesha S, Chapa-Y-Lazo B, Springall L, Sivashanmugam L, Mishima M, Martin S G, Oliferenko S, Palani S, Balasubramanian M K. mNG-tagged fusion proteins and nanobodies to visualize tropomyosins in yeast and mammalian cells. J Cell Sci. 2022;135(18) doi: 10.1242/jcs.260288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  295. Li Y, Molyneaux N, Zhang H, Zhou G, Kerr C, Adams M D, Berkner K L, Runge K W. A multiplexed, three-dimensional pooling and next-generation sequencing strategy for creating barcoded mutant arrays: construction of a Schizosaccharomyces pombe transposon insertion library. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(17):102–102. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  296. Bhardwaj V, Sweta K, Gyala D, Sharma N. Genetic Screen for Identification of Multicopy Suppressors in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Vis Exp. 2022;(187):63967–63967. doi: 10.3791/63967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  297. Gachet Y, Codlin S, Hyams J S, Se Mole. btn1 , the Schizosaccharomyces pombe homologue of the human Batten disease gene CLN3 , regulates vacuole homeostasis. J Cell Sci. 2005;118(23):5525–5536. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  298. Minnis C J, Townsend S, Petschnigg J, Tinelli E, Bähler J, Russell C, Se Mole. Global network analysis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe reveals three distinct consequences of the common 1-kb deletion causing juvenile CLN3 disease. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):6332–6332. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85471-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  299. Soriano I, Vazquez E, Leon De, Bertrand N, Heitzer S, Toumazou E, Bo S, Palles Z, Pai C, Humphrey C-C, Tomlinson T C, Cotterill I, S, Se Kearsey. Expression of the cancer-associated DNA polymerase ε P286R in fission yeast leads to translesion synthesis polymerase dependent hypermutation and defective DNA replication. PLOS Genet. 2021;17(7):1009526–1009526. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  300. Zhang J, Vernon K, Li Q, Benko Z, Amoroso A, Nasr M, Zhao R Y. Single-Agent and Fixed-Dose Combination HIV-1 Protease Inhibitor Drugs in Fission Yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe) Pathogens. 2021;10(7):804–804. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10070804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  301. Morishita J, Nurse P. Identification of novel microtubule inhibitors effective in fission yeast and human cells and their effects on breast cancer cell lines. Open Biol. 2021;11(9):210161–210161. doi: 10.1098/rsob.210161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  302. Morishita J, Nurse P. Identification of a small RhoA GTPase inhibitor effective in fission yeast and human cells. Open Biol. 2023;13(3):220185–220185. doi: 10.1098/rsob.220185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  303. Gallo G L, Valko A, Herrera Aguilar N, Weisz A D, Alessio D, C. A novel fission yeast platform to model N -glycosylation and the bases of congenital disorders of glycosylation type I. J Cell Sci. 2022;135(5):259167–259167. doi: 10.1242/jcs.259167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  304. Spataro V, Buetti-Dinh A. POH1/Rpn11/PSMD14: a journey from basic research in fission yeast to a prognostic marker and a druggable target in cancer cells. Br J Cancer. 2022;127(5):788–799. doi: 10.1038/s41416-022-01829-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  305. Sweta K, Dabas P, Sharma N. Sequence, structural and functional conservation among the human and fission yeast ELL and EAF transcription elongation factors. Mol Biol Rep. 2022;49(2):1303–1320. doi: 10.1007/s11033-021-06958-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  306. Ohtsuka H, Kato T, Sato T, Shimasaki T, Kojima T, Aiba H. Leucine depletion extends the lifespans of leucine-auxotrophic fission yeast by inducing Ecl1 family genes via the transcription factor Fil1. Mol Genet Genomics. 2019;294(6):1499–1509. doi: 10.1007/s00438-019-01592-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  307. Ohtsuka H, Shimasaki T, Aiba H. Response to leucine in Schizosaccharomyces pombe (fission yeast) FEMS Yeast Res. 2022;22(1):20–20. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/foac020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  308. Fukuda T, Sofyantoro F, Tai Y T, Chia K H, Matsuda T, Murase T, Morozumi Y, Tatebe H, Kanki T, Shiozaki K. Tripartite suppression of fission yeast TORC1 signaling by the GATOR1-Sea3 complex, the TSC complex, and Gcn2 kinase. 2021;10:60969–60969. doi: 10.7554/eLife.60969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  309. Kohli J, Hottinger H, Munz P, Strauss A, Thuriaux P. GENETIC MAPPING IN SCHIZOSACCHAROMYCES POMBE BY MITOTIC AND MEIOTIC ANALYSIS AND INDUCED HAPLOIDIZATION. 1977;87:471–489. doi: 10.1093/genetics/87.3.471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  310. Lay J, Henry L K, Clifford J, Koltin Y, Bulawa C E, Becker J M. Altered Expression of Selectable Marker URA3 in Gene-Disrupted Candida albicans Strains Complicates Interpretation of Virulence Studies. Infect Immun. 1998;66(11):5301–5306. doi: 10.1128/iai.66.11.5301-5306.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  311. Brand A, Maccallum D M, Brown Ajp, Gow Nar, Odds F C. Ectopic Expression of URA3 Can Influence the Virulence Phenotypes and Proteome of Candida albicans but Can Be Overcome by Targeted Reintegration of URA3 at the RPS10 Locus. Eukaryot Cell. 2004;3(4):900–909. doi: 10.1128/EC.3.4.900-909.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  312. Powers E N, Chan C, Doron-Mandel E, Allcca Llacsahuanga, L, Kim Kim, Jovanovic J, Brar M, G A. Bidirectional promoter activity from expression cassettes can drive off-target repression of neighboring gene translation. 2022;11:81086–81086. doi: 10.7554/eLife.81086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  313. Manolis K G. Novel functional requirements for non-homologous DNA end joining in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. EMBO J. 2001;20(1):210–221. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.1.210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  314. Miyoshi T, Kanoh J, Ishikawa F. Fission yeast Ku protein is required for recovery from DNA replication stress. Genes Cells. 2009;14(9):1091–1103. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2443.2009.01337.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  315. Acs-Szabo L, Papp L A, Takacs S, Miklos I. Disruption of the Schizosaccharomyces japonicus lig4 Disturbs Several Cellular Processes and Leads to a Pleiotropic Phenotype. J Fungi. 2023;9(5):550–550. doi: 10.3390/jof9050550. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  316. Wolfger H, Mamnun Y M, Kuchler K. Fungal ABC proteins: pleiotropic drug resistance, stress response and cellular detoxification. Res Microbiol. 2001;152(3-4):375–389. doi: 10.1016/s0923-2508(01)01209-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  317. Arita Y, Nishimura S, Matsuyama A, Yashiroda Y, Usui T, Boone C, Yoshida M. Microarray-based target identification using drug hypersensitive fission yeast expressing ORFeome. Mol Biosyst. 2011;7(5):1463–1463. doi: 10.1039/c0mb00326c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  318. Kawashima S A, Takemoto A, Nurse P, Kapoor T M. Analyzing Fission Yeast Multidrug Resistance Mechanisms to Develop a Genetically Tractable Model System for Chemical Biology. Chem Biol. 2012;19(7):893–901. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.06.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  319. Nguyen Ttt, Chua Jkk, Seah K S, Koo S H, Yee J Y, Yang E G, Lim K K, Pang Syw, Yuen A, Zhang L, Ang W H, Dymock B, Lee Ejd, Es Chen. Predicting chemotherapeutic drug combinations through gene network profiling. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):18658–18658. doi: 10.1038/srep18658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  320. Delerue T, Tribouillard-Tanvier D, Daloyau M, Khosrobakhsh F, Emorine L J, Friocourt G, Belenguer P, Blondel M, Arnauné-Pelloquin, L. A yeast-based screening assay identifies repurposed drugs that suppress mitochondrial fusion and mtDNA maintenance defects. Dis Model Mech. 2019;12(2) doi: 10.1242/dmm.036558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  321. Teng X, Dayhoff-Brannigan M, Cheng W-C, Gilbert C E, Sing C N, Diny N L, Wheelan S J, Dunham M J, Boeke J D, Pineda F J, Hardwick J M. Genome-wide Consequences of Deleting Any Single Gene. Mol Cell. 2013;52(4):485–494. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.09.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  322. Szamecz B, Boross G, Kalapis D, Kovács K, Fekete G, Farkas Z, Lázár V, Hrtyan M, Kemmeren P, Koerkamp Groot, Rutkai Mja, Holstege E, Papp Fcp, B. The Genomic Landscape of Compensatory Evolution. PLoS Biol. 2014;12(8):1001935–1001935. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials


Articles from Microbial Cell are provided here courtesy of Shared Science Publishers

RESOURCES