Table 2.
The I-CVI values and modified kappa values.
| Items | Athletes (n = 22) | Coaches (n = 16) | Sport Psychologists (n = 7) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | I-CVI | pc | k* | M | I-CVI | pc | k* | M | I-CVI | pc | k* | |
| 1 | 4.05 | 0.64 | 0.01 | 0.64 | 4.06 | 0.63 | 0.12 | 0.58 | 4.57 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 2 | 4.50 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 4.44 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.94 | 4.29 | 0.86 | 0.05 | 0.85 |
| 3 | 3.32 | 0.45 | 0.15 | 0.35 | 3.25 | 0.50 | 0.20 | 0.38 | 4.14 | 0.71 | 0.16 | 0.65 |
| 4 | 4.36 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.91 | 4.31 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.88 | 3.71 | 0.57 | 0.27 | 0.41 |
| 5 | 4.32 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.91 | 4.50 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 4.71 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 6 | 4.36 | 0.77 | 0.01 | 0.77 | 4.31 | 0.75 | 0.03 | 0.74 | 4.57 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 7 | 4.27 | 0.73 | 0.02 | 0.72 | 4.13 | 0.69 | 0.07 | 0.67 | 4.71 | 0.86 | 0.05 | 0.85 |
| 8 | 3.68 | 0.55 | 0.15 | 0.47 | 4.06 | 0.75 | 0.03 | 0.74 | 4.57 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 9 | 4.27 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.82 | 4.25 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.88 | 3.86 | 0.86 | 0.05 | 0.85 |
| 10 | 4.45 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.82 | 4.44 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.88 | 4.86 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 11 | 4.41 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.82 | 4.31 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.88 | 4.43 | 0.86 | 0.05 | 0.85 |
| 12 | 4.32 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.95 | 4.50 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 4.86 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 13 | 4.50 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 4.44 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.94 | 4.57 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 14 | 4.41 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.82 | 4.19 | 0.75 | 0.03 | 0.74 | 3.71 | 0.57 | 0.27 | 0.41 |
| 15 | 4.36 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.86 | 4.38 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.88 | 4.71 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 16 | 3.95 | 0.73 | 0.02 | 0.72 | 4.13 | 0.81 | 0.01 | 0.81 | 4.43 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 17 | 4.18 | 0.77 | 0.01 | 0.77 | 4.13 | 0.81 | 0.01 | 0.81 | 4.29 | 0.86 | 0.05 | 0.85 |
| 18 | 4.41 | 0.77 | 0.01 | 0.77 | 4.25 | 0.75 | 0.03 | 0.74 | 4.86 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 19 | 4.45 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.82 | 4.44 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.88 | 4.71 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 20 | 4.00 | 0.68 | 0.04 | 0.67 | 4.06 | 0.75 | 0.03 | 0.74 | 4.86 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 21 | 4.18 | 0.82 | 0.00 | 0.82 | 4.06 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.88 | 4.86 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 22 | 4.36 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.91 | 4.50 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 | 4.71 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 23 | 4.45 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 0.91 | 4.25 | 0.81 | 0.01 | 0.81 | 4.86 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 24 | 4.32 | 0.77 | 0.01 | 0.77 | 4.00 | 0.75 | 0.03 | 0.74 | 4.29 | 0.86 | 0.05 | 0.85 |
| 25 | 4.36 | 0.95 | 0.00 | 0.95 | 4.13 | 0.88 | 0.00 | 0.88 | 4.71 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 26 | 4.41 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.86 | 4.44 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.94 | 5.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.00 |
| 27 | 4.41 | 0.86 | 0.00 | 0.86 | 4.38 | 0.81 | 0.01 | 0.81 | 4.71 | 0.86 | 0.05 | 0.85 |
I-CVI is the item-level content validity index. pc is the probability of a chance occurrence. It was computed using the formula: pc = 0.5N [N!/A!(N-A)!], where N = number of judges and A = number agreeing on good relevance. k* is kappa designating agreement on relevance. It was computed using the formula: k* = (I-CVI – pc)/(1- pc). Evaluation criteria for kappa using guidelines by Cicchetti and Sparrow (1981) and Fleiss (1981): fair = k* of 0.40–0.59; good = k* of 0.60–0.74; and excellent = k* > 0.74.