Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eat Behav. 2023 Sep 2;51:101808. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2023.101808

Table 1:

Comparison of Participants’ Attitudes towards Hyperpalatable Food Scenario and Bitter Food Scenario

Attitudes Bitter Food Scenario Hyperpalatable Food Scenario Test Statistics
N (%) N (%) McNemar’s χ2 (df) p Effect Size
Positive Neutral Negative Positive Neutral Negative
General Sentiment Language 145 (25) 221 (38) 215 (37) 52 (9) 164 (28) 365 (63) 98.67 (3) <.001 0.15
Absent Present - Absent Present -
Health Judgement Language 442 (76) 139 (24) 533 (92) 48 (8) 49.091(1) <.001 0.01
Stigmatizing Language 549 (94) 32 (6) 516 (89) 65 (11) 12.05 (1) <.001 0.06
Normative Language 504 (87) 77 (13) 510 (88) 71 (12) 0.26 (1) 0.61 0.24
Mean (SD) Mean (SD) t (df) p
Self-Other Overlap 3.24 (1.85) 3.21 (1.86) 0.32 (1161) 0.75 0.02
Empathy 2.49 (1.06) 2.46 (1.15) 0.43 (1154.2) 0.67 0.03