Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 6;2024(8):CD015064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015064.pub2

Adam 1978.

Study characteristics
Methods Trial design: randomised, parallel study
Trial registration number: not reported
Country: Malaya
Outpatient or hospital, date trial conducted, duration of trial participation: not reported
Inclusion criteria: patients with skin disease because of contact eczema, photosensitivity, discoid eczema, AD or psoriasis
Exclusion criteria: not reported
Additional design details: AD participants were a subset with some results reported separately.
Participants Total number randomised: 14 participants with AD (8 to apply the intervention and 6 to apply the comparator)
Age, sex, ethnicity, duration of eczema, severity of eczema, body site, number of withdrawals: not reported
Notes: none
Interventions Run‐in details: no topical applications for at least two weeks prior to trial
Intervention: desoximetasone 0.25% ointment used twice daily for ≥ 30 days
· Concurrent treatment: not reported
· Other key information: Brand: Esperson
Comparator: betamethasone valerate (assumed 0.05%) ointment used twice daily for ≥ 30 days
· Concurrent treatment: not reported
· Other key information: none
Concurrent treatments received alongside both intervention and comparator: to quote: "No other treatment was given".
Notes: none
Outcomes Response to therapy at up to one month was grouped as: excellent to good, fair and poor. In "Excellent to good" response, the skin condition cleared and remission was maintained throughout their follow‐up. In "Fair" response, both symptoms and signs were less but there was no remission. If skin change remained as it was in the first visit or improvement was minimal, the response was categorised as "Poor".
Notes Funding source: Hoechst Malaysia Sdn. Bhd
Declarations of interest: not declared
Original language of publication: English
Other: none