Table 2.
Comparison of isopropanol production on acetate with previous literature
Process strategy | Medium | Titer [g L−1] | Yield [mol mol−1] | Overall qp [g g−1 h−1] | Source |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Growth decoupled 25 °C, constitutive | Defined | 4.85 ± 0.13 | 0.235 ± 0.030 | 0.053 ± 0.005 | This study |
Growth decoupled 25 °C, constitutivea | Defined | 8.07 ± 0.13 | 0.166 ± 0.003 | 0.029 ± 0.002 | This study |
Growth decoupled 25 °C, constitutiveb | Defined | 13.3 ± 0.2 | 0.196 ± 0.004 | 0.023 ± 0.003 | This study |
Growth decoupled 37 °C, constitutive | Defined | 5.90 ± 0.14 | 0.188 ± 0.005 | 0.081 ± 0.005 | This study |
Batch, inducible | Complex | 1.44 | 0.56 | n.a | [22] |
aindicates ~ 6.5 g L−1 biomass for the N-starvation phase after 30 h of starvation
bindicates ~ 6.5 g L−1 biomass for the N-starvation phase after 115 h of starvation