TABLE 9.
Comparison of Acuros BV‐calculated and RadCalc‐calculated point doses for completed interstitial cervical plans. All patients below had two implants and two separate plans, each with a distinct calculation point.
| Patient | Acuros BV dose point implant 1 (cGy) | RadCalc dose point implant 1 (cGy) | Percent difference (%) | Acuros BV dose point implant 2 (cGy) | RadCalc dose point implant 2 (cGy) | Percent difference (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 537.09 | 535.43 | −0.3% | 546.38 | 545.04 | −0.2% |
| 7 | 567.02 | 581.52 | 2.6% | 549.86 | 560.23 | 1.9% |
| 8 | 512.20 | 526.22 | 2.7% | 534.89 | 549.18 | 2.7% |
| 9 | 594.79 | 605.36 | 1.8% | 321.83 | 326.49 | 1.4% |
| 10 | 515.25 | 531.50 | 3.2% | 545.50 | 562.17 | 3.1% |