Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 6;2:55. doi: 10.1038/s44276-024-00071-9

Table 1.

Coding frame overview: research question, data source, and code(s).

Research Question Data Source Code Sub-code(s)
RQ1 Google listing Listing description declares clinic is: (a) alternative provider; (b) hospital, or medical and cancer clinic; (c) blank or unspecified.
RQ2 Google reviews Total rating scores (0–5) average Not applicable.
RQ3 Google reviews Negative review reasons (a) quality of facility; (b) quality of service provision (non-efficacy); (c) financial exploitation; (d) misrepresenting impact of treatment on cancer; (e) difficulty accessing treatment; (f) time away from loved ones; (g) treatment worsened patient conditions or cancer progressed; and (h) patient died.
Positive review reasons (a) quality of facility; (b) quality of service provision (non-efficacy); (c) quality of treatment; (d) curative or non-curative improvement.
RQ4 Google reviews Direct recommendation given in review Y/N Not applicable.
RQ5 Google reviews Type of person making review (a) patient; (b) family of patient; (c) friend of patient; (d) no relationship to patient; and (e) unspecified.
Patient cancer stage (a) stage 1; (b) stage 2; (c) stage 3; (d) stage 4 or terminal cancer.
Treatment(s) received Iteratively tallied.
Amount of money spent Iteratively tallied.
RQ6 Google reviews Clinic responses to negative reviews Y/N Not applicable.
Positive reviews disputing negative reviews Y/N Not applicable.