Table 2.
Overview of eponymous terms in anatomy
| Question | Yes | No | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Do you consider eponyms an important aspect of the history of anatomy? | 13 | 81.3% | 3 | 18.7% |
| B | Were you aware that since the oldest edition of the Nomina Anatomica (His 1895) the use of eponymous terms was censured? | 9 | 56.2% | 7 | 43.8% |
| C | Are you aware that despite this, new eponymous terms have been coined in anatomy since 1895, and in some medical fields (e.g. Neurology) are still growing? | 14 | 87.5% | 2 | 12.5% |
| D | In your opinion, are there valid reasons why eponymous terms should not be used in anatomy training? | 10 | 62.5% | 6 | 37.5% |
| E | In your own opinion, are there valid reasons for reintroduction of eponymous terms in anatomical training? | 9 | 56.2% | 7 | 43.8% |