Table 5.
Reasons for the use of eponyms in anatomical publications
| Which of the following do you consider valid reasons for the use of eponymous terminology in anatomical publishing? | Agree | |
|---|---|---|
| Historical significance (legacy/tradition) | 12/16 | 75.0% |
| Ability to simplify complex terminology | 6/16 | 37.5% |
| Ability to prevent misunderstanding of terminology | 4/16 | 25.0% |
| Addition of “character to the science | 3/16 | 18.8% |
| Honoring scientists/physicians of great achievement | 10/16 | 62.5% |
| Lending a philosophical/intangible aspect of anatomy/medicine | 5/16 | 31.3% |
| Responsibility to acknowledge past anatomists | 9/16 | 56.3% |
| Reminder of the humanity behind the science | 8/16 | 50.0% |
| Lack of corresponding anatomical term for an eponym in Terminologia Anatomica | 3/16 | 18.8% |
| Easy to remember, striking term | 7/16 | 43.8% |
| None of the above | 1/16 | 6.2% |