Table 7.
Stakeholders responsible on terminology recommendations regarding eponyms
| Who in your opinion, should be responsible for determining whether the recommendations regarding eponyms of the Nomina Anatomica and the subsequent Terminologia Anatomica, and Terminologia Anatomica 2 are applied in anatomical publishing? | Agree | |
|---|---|---|
| Societies/associations | 8/16 | 50.0% |
| Organizations | 3/16 | 18.8% |
| Heads of departments of anatomy | 5/16 | 31.3% |
| Universities | 2/16 | 12.5% |
| Journal publishers | 5/16 | 31.3% |
| Book publishers | 4/16 | 25.0% |
| Editors | 8/16 | 50.0% |
| Reviewers | 6/16 | 37.5% |
| Scientists | 5/16 | 31.3% |
| Physicians | 3/16 | 18.8% |
| Clinicians | 2/16 | 12.5% |
| Educators | 4/16 | 25.0% |
| Other | 2/16 | 12.5% |
| None of the above | 2/16 | 12.5% |